3 research outputs found

    Redox-Active Ferrocene as a Tuning Functionality for Magnetic Superexchange Interactions of Bis(oxamato) Type Complexes

    No full text
    The reaction of 1,1′-diaminoferrocene with two equivalents of ethyloxalyl chloride in THF afforded the diethyl ester of <i>N,N</i>′-ferrocenylenebis­(oxamic acid) (1,1′-fcbaH<sub>2</sub>Et<sub>2</sub>, <b>1</b>). <b>1</b> was converted readily to its saponificated form only, namely [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[(1,1′-fcbaH<sub>2</sub>)] (<b>2</b>), when treated with 4 equiv of [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]­OH followed by the subsequent addition of [Ni­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]­Cl<sub>2</sub>, whereas [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(1,1′-fcba)] (<b>3</b>) was obtained in ca. 70% yield by using CuCl<sub>2</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O. Oxidation of <b>3</b> with I<sub>2</sub> led to the formation of [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]­[Cu­(1,1′-fcba)] (<b>4</b>). A combined study of <b>4</b> by ESR and <sup>57</sup>Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, supported by DFT calculations, revealed the iron atom of <b>4</b> to possess the oxidation state +3. Treatment of <b>1</b> with MeNH<sub>2</sub> resulted in the exclusive formation of the methyl ester of ferrocenylene-1-(<i>N</i>-methyloxamide)-1′-(oxamic acid) (1,1′-fcooH<sub>3</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>, <b>5</b>). Successive treatment of <b>5</b> with [Cu<sub>2</sub>(OAc)<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] and [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]­OH gave rise to the formation of [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(fcooMe)]·2H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6A</b>·2H<sub>2</sub>O and <b>6B</b>·2H<sub>2</sub>O), for which single crystals of the compositions [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(1,1′-fcooMe)]·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>MeOH·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6A</b>·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>MeOH·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O) and [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(1,1′-fcooMe)]·2.25H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6B</b>·2.25H<sub>2</sub>O) were grown. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies revealed <b>6A</b>·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>MeOH·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O and <b>6B</b>·2.25H<sub>2</sub>O to contain [Cu­(fcooMe)]<sup>2–</sup> fragments in the form of two different conformers, having a significant difference in their total energy, as found by DFT calculations. Treatment of <b>3</b> and <b>4</b>, respectively, with [Cu­(pmdta)­(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>] afforded the tetranuclear complexes [Cu<sub>3</sub>(1,1′-fcba)­(pmdta)<sub>2</sub>]­(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub><i>n</i></sub> (<i>n</i> = 2 (<b>7</b>), 3 (<b>8</b>)). The solid-state structures of <b>1</b>–<b>3</b>, <b>7</b>, and <b>8</b> were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The magnetic properties of <b>3</b>, <b>4</b>, <b>7</b>, and <b>8</b> were studied by susceptibility measurements versus temperature. For <b>4</b> a weak antiferromagnetic coupling between the Cu<sup>II</sup> and Fe<sup>III</sup> ions has been obtained with <i>J</i> = −2 cm<sup>–1</sup>, whereas <b>3</b> can be understood as a purely paramagnetic, Cu<sup>II</sup>/Fe<sup>II</sup>-containing complex only. For <b>7</b> a <i>J</i> parameter of −58 cm<sup>–1</sup> has been obtained due to an antiferromagnetic interaction between its Cu<sup>II</sup> ions. This magnetic exchange interaction modifies in <b>8</b> to −64 cm<sup>–1</sup>, and an additional ferromagnetic coupling of 4 cm<sup>–1</sup> between the Fe<sup>III</sup> ion and the central Cu<sup>II</sup> ion is obtained

    Redox-Active Ferrocene as a Tuning Functionality for Magnetic Superexchange Interactions of Bis(oxamato) Type Complexes

    No full text
    The reaction of 1,1′-diaminoferrocene with two equivalents of ethyloxalyl chloride in THF afforded the diethyl ester of <i>N,N</i>′-ferrocenylenebis­(oxamic acid) (1,1′-fcbaH<sub>2</sub>Et<sub>2</sub>, <b>1</b>). <b>1</b> was converted readily to its saponificated form only, namely [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[(1,1′-fcbaH<sub>2</sub>)] (<b>2</b>), when treated with 4 equiv of [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]­OH followed by the subsequent addition of [Ni­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]­Cl<sub>2</sub>, whereas [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(1,1′-fcba)] (<b>3</b>) was obtained in ca. 70% yield by using CuCl<sub>2</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O. Oxidation of <b>3</b> with I<sub>2</sub> led to the formation of [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]­[Cu­(1,1′-fcba)] (<b>4</b>). A combined study of <b>4</b> by ESR and <sup>57</sup>Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, supported by DFT calculations, revealed the iron atom of <b>4</b> to possess the oxidation state +3. Treatment of <b>1</b> with MeNH<sub>2</sub> resulted in the exclusive formation of the methyl ester of ferrocenylene-1-(<i>N</i>-methyloxamide)-1′-(oxamic acid) (1,1′-fcooH<sub>3</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>, <b>5</b>). Successive treatment of <b>5</b> with [Cu<sub>2</sub>(OAc)<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] and [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]­OH gave rise to the formation of [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(fcooMe)]·2H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6A</b>·2H<sub>2</sub>O and <b>6B</b>·2H<sub>2</sub>O), for which single crystals of the compositions [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(1,1′-fcooMe)]·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>MeOH·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6A</b>·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>MeOH·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O) and [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(1,1′-fcooMe)]·2.25H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6B</b>·2.25H<sub>2</sub>O) were grown. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies revealed <b>6A</b>·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>MeOH·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O and <b>6B</b>·2.25H<sub>2</sub>O to contain [Cu­(fcooMe)]<sup>2–</sup> fragments in the form of two different conformers, having a significant difference in their total energy, as found by DFT calculations. Treatment of <b>3</b> and <b>4</b>, respectively, with [Cu­(pmdta)­(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>] afforded the tetranuclear complexes [Cu<sub>3</sub>(1,1′-fcba)­(pmdta)<sub>2</sub>]­(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub><i>n</i></sub> (<i>n</i> = 2 (<b>7</b>), 3 (<b>8</b>)). The solid-state structures of <b>1</b>–<b>3</b>, <b>7</b>, and <b>8</b> were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The magnetic properties of <b>3</b>, <b>4</b>, <b>7</b>, and <b>8</b> were studied by susceptibility measurements versus temperature. For <b>4</b> a weak antiferromagnetic coupling between the Cu<sup>II</sup> and Fe<sup>III</sup> ions has been obtained with <i>J</i> = −2 cm<sup>–1</sup>, whereas <b>3</b> can be understood as a purely paramagnetic, Cu<sup>II</sup>/Fe<sup>II</sup>-containing complex only. For <b>7</b> a <i>J</i> parameter of −58 cm<sup>–1</sup> has been obtained due to an antiferromagnetic interaction between its Cu<sup>II</sup> ions. This magnetic exchange interaction modifies in <b>8</b> to −64 cm<sup>–1</sup>, and an additional ferromagnetic coupling of 4 cm<sup>–1</sup> between the Fe<sup>III</sup> ion and the central Cu<sup>II</sup> ion is obtained

    Redox-Active Ferrocene as a Tuning Functionality for Magnetic Superexchange Interactions of Bis(oxamato) Type Complexes

    No full text
    The reaction of 1,1′-diaminoferrocene with two equivalents of ethyloxalyl chloride in THF afforded the diethyl ester of <i>N,N</i>′-ferrocenylenebis­(oxamic acid) (1,1′-fcbaH<sub>2</sub>Et<sub>2</sub>, <b>1</b>). <b>1</b> was converted readily to its saponificated form only, namely [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[(1,1′-fcbaH<sub>2</sub>)] (<b>2</b>), when treated with 4 equiv of [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]­OH followed by the subsequent addition of [Ni­(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]­Cl<sub>2</sub>, whereas [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(1,1′-fcba)] (<b>3</b>) was obtained in ca. 70% yield by using CuCl<sub>2</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O. Oxidation of <b>3</b> with I<sub>2</sub> led to the formation of [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]­[Cu­(1,1′-fcba)] (<b>4</b>). A combined study of <b>4</b> by ESR and <sup>57</sup>Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, supported by DFT calculations, revealed the iron atom of <b>4</b> to possess the oxidation state +3. Treatment of <b>1</b> with MeNH<sub>2</sub> resulted in the exclusive formation of the methyl ester of ferrocenylene-1-(<i>N</i>-methyloxamide)-1′-(oxamic acid) (1,1′-fcooH<sub>3</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>, <b>5</b>). Successive treatment of <b>5</b> with [Cu<sub>2</sub>(OAc)<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>] and [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]­OH gave rise to the formation of [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(fcooMe)]·2H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6A</b>·2H<sub>2</sub>O and <b>6B</b>·2H<sub>2</sub>O), for which single crystals of the compositions [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(1,1′-fcooMe)]·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>MeOH·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6A</b>·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>MeOH·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O) and [<sup><i>n</i></sup>Bu<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>[Cu­(1,1′-fcooMe)]·2.25H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>6B</b>·2.25H<sub>2</sub>O) were grown. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies revealed <b>6A</b>·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>MeOH·<sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O and <b>6B</b>·2.25H<sub>2</sub>O to contain [Cu­(fcooMe)]<sup>2–</sup> fragments in the form of two different conformers, having a significant difference in their total energy, as found by DFT calculations. Treatment of <b>3</b> and <b>4</b>, respectively, with [Cu­(pmdta)­(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>] afforded the tetranuclear complexes [Cu<sub>3</sub>(1,1′-fcba)­(pmdta)<sub>2</sub>]­(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub><i>n</i></sub> (<i>n</i> = 2 (<b>7</b>), 3 (<b>8</b>)). The solid-state structures of <b>1</b>–<b>3</b>, <b>7</b>, and <b>8</b> were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The magnetic properties of <b>3</b>, <b>4</b>, <b>7</b>, and <b>8</b> were studied by susceptibility measurements versus temperature. For <b>4</b> a weak antiferromagnetic coupling between the Cu<sup>II</sup> and Fe<sup>III</sup> ions has been obtained with <i>J</i> = −2 cm<sup>–1</sup>, whereas <b>3</b> can be understood as a purely paramagnetic, Cu<sup>II</sup>/Fe<sup>II</sup>-containing complex only. For <b>7</b> a <i>J</i> parameter of −58 cm<sup>–1</sup> has been obtained due to an antiferromagnetic interaction between its Cu<sup>II</sup> ions. This magnetic exchange interaction modifies in <b>8</b> to −64 cm<sup>–1</sup>, and an additional ferromagnetic coupling of 4 cm<sup>–1</sup> between the Fe<sup>III</sup> ion and the central Cu<sup>II</sup> ion is obtained
    corecore