Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations-2

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/6/5</p><p>BMC Medicine 2008;6():5-5.</p><p>Published online 14 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2265293.</p><p></p

Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations-1

M. The width of paths is proportional to the path coefficient. The saturated model allowed all variables to the left of a variable to have a causal influence on that variable and non-significant paths were removed until paths remaining were significant with < 0.05. Paths not shown as causal arrows did not reach significance with < 0.05.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/6/5</p><p>BMC Medicine 2008;6():5-5.</p><p>Published online 14 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2265293.</p><p></p

Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations-0

Ve average values). Error bars indicate ± 1 SE and because sample sizes are large (typically of the order of 500 and over 5000 in the case of London), error terms are small (see the text).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/6/5</p><p>BMC Medicine 2008;6():5-5.</p><p>Published online 14 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2265293.</p><p></p