When repair meets chromatin: First in series on chromatin dynamics

In eukaryotic cells, the inheritance of both the DNA sequence and its organization into chromatin is critical to maintain genome stability. This maintenance is challenged by DNA damage. To fully understand how the cell can tolerate genotoxic stress, it is necessary to integrate knowledge of the nature of DNA damage, its detection and its repair within the chromatin environment of a eukaryotic nucleus. The multiplicity of the DNA damage and repair processes, as well as the complex nature of chromatin, have made this issue difficult to tackle. Recent progress in each of these areas enables us to address, both at a molecular and a cellular level, the importance of inter-relationships between them. In this review we revisit the ‘access, repair, restore’ model, which was proposed to explain how the conserved process of nucleotide excision repair operates within chromatin. Recent studies have identified factors potentially involved in this process and permit refinement of the basic model. Drawing on this model, the chromatin alterations likely to be required during other processes of DNA damage repair, particularly double-strand break repair, are discussed and recently identified candidates that might perform such alterations are highlighted

The Mre11 complex is required for ATM activation and the G(2)/M checkpoint

The maintenance of genome integrity requires a rapid and specific response to many types of DNA damage. The conserved and related PI3-like protein kinases, ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATM-Rad3-related (ATR), orchestrate signal transduction pathways in response to genomic insults, such as DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). It is unclear which proteins recognize DSBs and activate these pathways, but the Mre11/Rad50/NBS1 complex has been suggested to act as a damage sensor. Here we show that infection with an adenovirus lacking the E4 region also induces a cellular DNA damage response, with activation of ATM and ATR. Wild-type virus blocks this signaling through degradation of the Mre11 complex by the viral E1b55K/E4orf6 proteins. Using these viral proteins, we show that the Mre11 complex is required for both ATM activation and the ATM-dependent G(2)/M checkpoint in response to DSBs. These results demonstrate that the Mre11 complex can function as a damage sensor upstream of ATM/ATR signaling in mammalian cells

The RNA surveillance protein SMG1 activates p53 in response to DNA double-strand breaks but not exogenously oxidized mRNA

DNA damage, stalled replication forks, errors in mRNA splicing and availability of nutrients activate specific phosphatidylinositiol-3-kinase-like kinases (PIKKs) that in turn phosphorylate downstream targets such as p53 on serine 15. While the PIKK proteins ATM and ATR respond to specific DNA lesions, SMG1 responds to errors in mRNA splicing and when cells are exposed to genotoxic stress. Yet, whether genotoxic stress activates SMG1 through specific types of DNA lesions or RNA damage remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that siRNA oligonucleotides targeting the mRNA surveillance proteins SMG1, Upf1, Upf2 or the PIKK protein ATM attenuated p53 (ser15) phosphorylation in cells damaged by high oxygen (hyperoxia), a model of persistent oxidative stress that damages nucleotides. In contrast, loss of SMG1 or ATM, but not Upf1 or Upf2 reduced p53 (ser15) phosphorylation in response to DNA double strand breaks produced by expression of the endonuclease I-PpoI. To determine whether SMG1-dependent activation of p53 was in response to oxidative mRNA damage, mRNA encoding green fluorescence protein (GFP) transcribed in vitro was oxidized by Fenton chemistry and transfected into cells. Although oxidation of GFP mRNA resulted in dose-dependent fragmentation of the mRNA and reduced expression of GFP, it did not stimulate p53 or the p53-target gene p21. These findings establish SMG1 activates p53 in response to DNA double strand breaks independent of the RNA surveillance proteins Upf1 or Upf2; however, these proteins can stimulate p53 in response to oxidative stress but not necessarily oxidized RNA

Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes facilitate DNA double-strand break repair by promoting γ-H2AX induction

Although mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes have been well established to play important role in transcription, their role in DNA repair has remained largely unexplored. Here we show that inactivation of the SWI/SNF complexes and downregulation of the catalytic core subunits of the complexes both result in inefficient DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair and increased DNA damage sensitivity as well as a large defect in H2AX phosphorylation (γ-H2AX) and nuclear focus formation after DNA damage. The expression of most DSB repair genes remains unaffected and DNA damage checkpoints are grossly intact in the cells inactivated for the SWI/SNF complexes. Although the SWI/SNF complexes do not affect the expression of ATM, DNA-PK and ATR, or their activation and/or recruitment to DSBs, they rapidly bind to DSB-surrounding chromatin via interaction with γ-H2AX in the manner that is dependent on the amount of DNA damage. Given the crucial role for γ-H2AX in efficient DSB repair, these results suggest that the SWI/SNF complexes facilitate DSB repair, at least in part, by promoting H2AX phosphorylation by directly acting on chromatin

Involvement of novel autophosphorylation sites in ATM activation

ATM kinase plays a central role in signaling DNA double-strand breaks to cell cycle checkpoints and to the DNA repair machinery. Although the exact mechanism of ATM activation remains unknown, efficient activation requires the Mre11 complex, autophosphorylation on S1981 and the involvement of protein phosphatases and acetylases. We report here the identification of several additional phosphorylation sites on ATM in response to DNA damage, including autophosphorylation on pS367 and pS1893. ATM autophosphorylates all these sites in vitro in response to DNA damage. Antibodies against phosphoserine 1893 revealed rapid and persistent phosphorylation at this site after in vivo activation of ATM kinase by ionizing radiation, paralleling that observed for S1981 phosphorylation. Phosphorylation was dependent on functional ATM and on the Mre11 complex. All three autophosphorylation sites are physiologically important parts of the DNA damage response, as phosphorylation site mutants (S367A, S1893A and S1981A) were each defective in ATM signaling in vivo and each failed to correct radiosensitivity, genome instability and cell cycle checkpoint defects in ataxia-telangiectasia cells. We conclude that there are at least three functionally important radiation-induced autophosphorylation events in ATM

Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks

We thank M. Gellert, A. Singer and R. Hodes for critical comments on the manuscript. We also thank D. Sackett for assistance, Y. Pommier and P. Leder for kindly providing the ATM-deficient cells, S. Ganesan and J. Chen for kindly providing Brca1 and 53BP1 antibodies. In addition, we also thank R. Schroff and M. Lichten for sharing unpublished data.Histone H2AX is rapidly phosphorylated in the chromatin micro-environment surrounding a DNA double-strand break (DSB). Although H2AX deficiency is not detrimental to life, H2AX is required for the accumulation of numerous essential proteins into irradiation induced foci (IRIF). However, the relationship between IRIF formation, H2AX phosphorylation (gamma-H2AX) and the detection of DNA damage is unclear. Here, we show that the migration of repair and signalling proteins to DSBs is not abrogated in H2AX(-/-) cells, or in H2AX-deficient cells that have been reconstituted with H2AX mutants that eliminate phosphorylation. Despite their initial recruitment to DSBs, numerous factors, including Nbs1, 53BP1 and Brca1, subsequently fail to form IRIF. We propose that gamma-H2AX does not constitute the primary signal required for the redistribution of repair complexes to damaged chromatin, but may function to concentrate proteins in the vicinity of DNA lesions. The differential requirements for factor recruitment to DSBs and sequestration into IRIF may explain why essential regulatory pathways controlling the ability of cells to respond to DNA damage are not abolished in the absence of H2AX.S