18 research outputs found

    Preclinical discovery of candidate genes to guide pharmacogenetics during phase I development: the example of the novel anticancer agent ABT-751

    Get PDF
    ABT-751, a novel orally available antitubulin agent, is mainly eliminated as inactive glucuronide (ABT-751G) and sulfate (ABT-751S) conjugates. We performed a pharmacogenetic investigation of ABT-751 pharmacokinetics using in-vitro data to guide the selection of genes for genotyping in a phase I trial of ABT-751

    Frequency of the Frame-Shifting CYP2D7

    No full text

    Comparison of biomarker assays for EGFR:Implications for precision medicine in patients with glioblastoma

    No full text
    PURPOSE: Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a poor prognosis and are in desperate need of better therapies. As therapeutic decisions are increasingly guided by biomarkers, and EGFR abnormalities are common in GBM, thus representing a potential therapeutic target, we systematically evaluated methods of assessing EGFR amplification by multiple assays. Specifically, we evaluated correlation between fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), a standard assay for detecting EGFR amplification, with other methods. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples were used for all assays. EGFR amplification was detected using FISH (N = 206) and whole exome sequencing (WES, N = 74). EGFR mRNA expression was measured using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR, N = 206) and transcriptome profiling (RNAseq, N = 64). EGFR protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC, N = 34). Significant correlations between various methods were determined using Cohen’s kappa (Îș = 0.61 – 0.80 defines substantial agreement) or R(2) statistics. RESULTS: EGFR mRNA expression levels by RNAseq and RT-PCR were highly correlated with EGFR amplification assessed by FISH (Îș = 0.702). High concordance was also observed when comparing FISH to WES (Îș = 0.739). RNA expression was superior to protein expression in delineating EGFR amplification. CONCLUSIONS: Methods for assessing EGFR mRNA expression (RT-PCR, RNAseq) and copy number (WES), but not protein expression (IHC), can be used as surrogates for EGFR amplification (FISH) in GBM. Collectively, our results provide enhanced understanding of available screening options for patients, which may help guide EGFR-targeted therapy approaches
    corecore