Matched-pair analysis of transplant from haploidentical, Unmanipulated bone marrow donor versus HLA identical sibling for patients with hematologic malignancies

A matched-pair analysis of transplant-related outcomes was carried out in 116 of 255 consecutive patients who received transplants from an HLA identical sibling (n = 58) or haploidentical related donor (n = 58). The 2 patient series were matched with 9 variables: period of transplant, patient and donor age, sex, diagnosis, disease phase, conditioning regimen, donor-recipient sex, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) status combinations. As graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, all patients received the standard cyclosporine and methotrexate association with the addition of anti-thymocyte globulins, mycophenolate mofetil, and basiliximab in haploidentical, unmanipulated bone marrow recipients. Anti-infectious management, transfusion policy, and supportive care were identical for all patients. By comparing the 2 patient series, no statistically significant difference was observed for the cumulative incidence of advanced acute and extensive chronic GVHD, transplant-related mortality, and relapse. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the 5-year disease-free survival was 37% ± 6% and 36% ± 6% for HLA identical sibling and haploidentical recipients, respectively. The results of transplant from HLA identical siblings and haploidentical donors are comparable. Regardless of the HLA matching, other factors known to affect the transplant outcomes, such as donor-recipient age, sex, and CMV status combinations, might drive the search for the best donor

Ruxolitinib in clinical practice for primary and secondary myelofibrosis: an analysis of safety and efficacy of Gruppo Laziale of Ph-negative MPN.

Ruxolitinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, has been tested and approved for the treatment of primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF). Aim of our study is to report safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in 98 patients affected by MF treated outside clinical trials and collected and treated consecutively by the Lazio Cooperative Group for Ph negative myeloproliferative diseases.There were 45 males and 53 females; median age was 61.8 years (range 35.3-88). Forty-five patients were diagnosed as primary MF and 53 as secondary MF. Seventy-seven patients (78.5%) experienced constitutional symptoms at baseline, and out of 94 patients tested, 66 (70%) were JAK2V617F mutated. Overall, 40 patients received hydroxyurea as firstline treatment, 30 patients received other chemotherapeutic approaches, whereas 28 were treated with ruxolitinib frontline. Median time from diagnosis to start of ruxolitinib in the whole cohort was 34.6 months. Fifty-eight patients (59%) required a dose reduction during the first 3 months due to hematological toxicity in the majority of cases. At 48 weeks, 52% of patients obtained a clinical benefit: of them 7 patients (7%) had a CR, 10 (10%) a PR, 6 patients (6%) a CI, and 28 patients (28.5%) a spleen response. Overall, 66% of patients had disappearance of baseline symptoms burden. After 1 year, of 72 evaluable patients, 52% achieved and maintained a clinical benefit. Adverse events of special interest at any grade included anemia (39.7%), thrombocytopenia (25.5%), infections (16.3%, of which 10 were bronchopneumonia), fluid retention (3%), diarrhea (2%) and abdominal pain (2%). After a median follow-up of 16 months from start of ruxolitinib, median daily dose decreased to 10 mg BID and 21 patients (21%) discontinued the drug. The results of this retrospective multicentric analysis confirmed the efficacy of ruxolitinib outside clinical trials with more than half of treated patients achieving and maintaining a clinical benefit and most of them reporting relief from symptoms

Anagrelide in Essential Thrombocythemia (ET): Results from 150 patients over 25 years by the “Ph1‐negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Latium Group”

Background and aims: Anagrelide is a drug effective in reducing platelet counts in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and Ph1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life use of anagrelide in patients with ET followed over 25 years at the Haematological Institutes belonging to “Ph1-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Latium Group.”. Patients and methods: Eligibility criteria were diagnosis of ET and treatment with anagrelide. Data were collected through an ad hoc case report form. Results: One hundred and fifty patients received anagrelide for a median time of 7.4 years (0.1-23.2). Anagrelide was administered as first-line therapy in 34.7% of patients, as second-line in 52% and as third-line in 13.3%: 85.4% responded to therapy. Sixty-eight/136 evaluable patients reported side effects: palpitations, peripheral vasodilation, anaemia, diarrhoea and gastric distress. Fourteen thrombotic (arterial 10, venous 4) and 51 bleeding events (minor 48, major 3) occurred. Sixteen/150 (10.6%) patients developed secondary myelofibrosis and 3/150 (2%) an acute myeloid leukaemia. Conclusions: In our experience, anagrelide is an effective drug in reducing platelet levels in a high percentage of patients with ET. It is especially addressed to younger people. A careful assessment of the thrombotic risk and monitoring of cardiac function, at diagnosis and during follow-up, is mandatory

Survival of Patients with High Risk Hematological Malignancy after Allogeneic Transplant from HLA Identical Siblings Is Comparable to That of Patients Transplanted from Haploidentical, Unmanipulated Bone Marrow Donor: Results of a Matched-Pair Analysis from the Rome Transplant Network

Patients and Methods. At the Rome Transplant Network, a JACIE accredited metropolitan transplant program, a matched-pair analysis has been conducted on 116 of 255 patients transplanted between January 2008 and December 2012. The patients transplanted from Id Sib (n=58) or Haplo related donors (n=58) were completely matched for the following features: patient age, gender, diagnosis (7 subgroups), disease phase (early: CR1+CR2; advanced: >CR2+active disease), myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning regimen consisting of Thiotepa, i.v. Busulphan and Fludarabine (TBF) association, donor age and donor/recipient sex, AB0 and CMV combinations. As GVHD prophylaxis, all patients received the standard CSA and MTX combination with the addition of ATG, MMF and Basiliximab in Haplo bone marrow recipients. The transfusion policy, supportive care and antinfectious prophylaxis were identical for all patients. Results. By comparingId Sib to Haplo recipients, the cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV and III-IV acute-GVHD was 18±5% vs 42±7% (p=0.002) and 7±3% vs 14±5% (p=ns), respectively. The CI of extensive chronic GVHD was 23±6% for both patient series. The 5-year CI of TRM was 30±6% vs 36±6% (p=ns), respectively. The main causes of TRM were infections and the 6-month CI of Infection Related Mortality (IRM) was 26±6% in Haplo transplant and 10±4% in Id Sib (p=0.04). Although not statistically significant, the 5-year CI of relapse was higher in Id Sib (40±7%) than in Haplo recipients (28±6%). With a median follow-up of 3.5 years (range, 1 - 6), the 1- and 5-year disease free survival (DFS) was respectively 50±7% and 37±6% for Id Sibs and 45±7% and 36±6% for Haplo (Figure 1). Since 2 years after transplant, DFS curves of Id Sib and Haplo patients remained at plateau and were overlapping. Conclusions. This analysis considered a high number of factors for matching patients, who were grafted according to an identical transplant program. We can conclude that as consequence of a more intensive GVHD prophylaxis and therapy ensuing from higher incidence of >II grade acute GVHD, Haplo recipients are mainly exposed to a risk of early infection mortality. On the other hand, Id Sib patients seem to express less graft-versus-tumor activity with increasing risk of relapse after transplant. The identical long-term DFS justifies to consider the unmanipulated bone marrow transplant from haploidentical donor a valid alternative for patients lacking an HLA identical sib. Finally, it can appear at present provocative, but certainly realistic in perspective, the hypothesis that the donor choice in a familiar setting will mainly take into account other favourable donor/recipient combined characteristics rather than HLA compatibility

Spleen enlargement is a risk factor for thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia: Evaluation on 1,297 patients

Spleen enlargement, present in 10-20% of Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) patients at diagnosis, is a feature clinically easy to assess, confirmable by echography with a very low chance of misinterpretation. Nonetheless, the clinical and prognostic role of splenomegaly has been seldom evaluated. From 1979 to 2013, 1297 ET patients retrospectively collected in the database of the Lazio Cooperative Group and Bologna University Hospital were evaluable for spleen enlargement at diagnosis and included in the analysis. On the whole, spleen was enlarged in 172/1297 (13.0%) patients; in most cases (94.8%) splenomegaly was mild (≤5 cm). Patients with splenomegaly were younger, predominantly male, presented higher platelet count and JAK2V617F allele burden and had a lower incidence of concomitant cardiovascular risk factors. At least one thrombotic event during follow-up occurred in 97/1,125 (8.6%) patients without spleen enlargement compared to 27/172 (15.7%) patients with spleen enlargement (P = 0.003). Despite comparable use of cytoreductive/antiplatelet therapies in the two groups, the cumulative risk of thrombosis at 5 years was significantly higher in patients with baseline splenomegaly (9.8% versus 4.4% in patients without splenomegaly, P = 0.012). In multivariate analysis exploring risk factors for thrombosis, splenomegaly retained its negative prognostic role, together with previous thrombosis, leucocyte count and male gender. Baseline splenomegaly seems to be an independent additional risk factor for thrombosis in nonstrictly WHO-defined ET patients. This data could be useful in the real-life clinical management of these patients

Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in Elderly Patients (> 75 years) with Myelofibrosis

Background. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is the first commercially available JAK1/2 inhibitor that may control splenomegaly and systemic symptoms related to myelofibrosis (MF). Despite MF occur frequently in elderly patients (pts), no data are yet available on RUX efficacy and safety in this particularly frail population. Methods We report on 100 pts [M/F 57/43, median age at diagnosis 75.7 years, interquartile range (IQR) 72.3 - 78.0, median age at baseline of RUX treatment 77.7 years, IQR 76.2 - 80.3] with WHO-defined MF treated with RUX when aged 65 75 years. Data were extracted from the whole cohort of 408 pts of any age collected in a database involving 22 Italian Centers. Comorbidities were recorded at the time of diagnosis and classified according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Response to RUX was evaluated according to IWG-MRT criteria. Results Main clinical features after stratification according to age at RUX start are reported in Table 1. Compared to younger pts, elderly pts carried a higher number of co-morbidities and had lower hemoglobin and platelet values, thus starting RUX with lower doses. Time from diagnosis to RUX start was comparable among the two cohorts (median 15.5 months, IQR 4.6 - 66.7, vs 20.8 months, IQR 4.1 - 66.0, p=0.74). According to IWG criteria, a spleen response was achieved by 37 out of 90 (41.1%) evaluable elderly pts compared to 115 out of 272 (42.2%) pts <75y (p=0.85) while symptom response was achieved by 88/99 (88.8%) elderly pts compared to 271/304 (89.1%) younger pts (p=0.94). Drug-related anemia (Hb <10 g/dl in pts with baseline Hb 6510 g/dl) was observed in 30/68 (44.1%) evaluable elderly pts compared with 100/240 (41.6%) evaluable younger subjects (p=0.72). The percentage of pts that decreased RUX dose over time was comparable in the two groups (29% and 29.8%, respectively). Overall, 47% elderly and 32% younger pts finally discontinued RUX (p=0.008) after a median time of 12.3 and 21.6 months, respectively (p=0.03). Evolution into acute leukemia occurred in 8 (8.0%) elderly pts and in 22 (7.1%) younger pts, respectively (p=0.78), with a similar evolution-free survival from RUX initiation (p=0.35). As expected, 43 (43.0%) elderly pts and 53 (17.3%) younger pts died (p<0.001) after a median time from RUX start of 14.2 and 24.2, respectively (p=0.03). Causes of death in elderly pts were: progression of myelofibrosis (32.5%), heart disease (16.3%), infections (14%), acute leukemia (7%), hemorrhage/thrombosis (7%), other unrelated causes (23.2%). Compared to elderly, younger pts died less frequently due to heart disease (3.6%) (p=0.03), and more frequently due to acute leukemia (23.2%) (p=0.03). The 4-year cumulative Event-Free Survival (taking into account: RUX discontinuation, blastic evolution and death for any cause) was 30.1% (95% CI: 16.2 - 44.0) in elderly pts and 46.1% (95% CI 37.3 - 54.9) in younger subjects, respectively (p=0.002). Conclusions. Despite the elderly carried a higher number of comorbidities and were treated with lower starting and titrated doses of RUX,RUX was feasible and effective in this setting, achieving clinical responses similar to younger subjects, with comparable toxicity rates. Thus, the study do not support to restrain the use of RUX based on older age and comorbidities