11 research outputs found

    Stable association of Augmin with spindle poles compensate for the lack of centrosomes in oocytes.

    No full text
    <p>Stable association of Augmin with spindle poles compensate for the lack of centrosomes in oocytes.</p

    Augmin is stably associated with spindle microtubules.

    No full text
    <p>(A–D) FRAP of spindle-associated GFP-Dgt2 in wild-type metaphase I oocytes (A), in wild-type prometaphase/metaphase syncytial embryos (B), in oocytes depleted of Îł-tubulin37C by RNAi (C), and in <i>ncd<sup>D</sup></i> homozygous mutant oocytes (D). A typical meiotic figure used for FRAP is shown for each. Error bars are SEM. n≄15 in meiosis and n≄11 in mitosis. (E) Western blot of oocytes using an antibody which recognises all Îł-tubulin in oocytes in wild type and after depletion of Îł-tubulin37C by RNAi. (F) Two hypothetical models for stable association of Augmin with spindle microtubules. Our data are consistent with the “stabilise and then nucleate” model.</p

    Augmin accumulation at spindle poles is correlated with chromosome congression.

    No full text
    <p>(A, B) GFP-Dgt2 and Wac-GFP localise to wild-type acentrosomal spindle poles. (C) Dgt6 localises to spindle poles in wild-type oocytes by immunostaining. (D) The Augmin level in spindle pole regions is well correlated with the level of chromosome congression. Live oocytes expressing GFP-Dgt2 and Rcc1-mCherry were used to measure two parameters: the spread of the chromosome mass (including the 4th chromosomes) along the spindle axis (as in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003562#pgen-1003562-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1B</a>), and the intensity of GFP-Dgt2 signal above the background (as in Methods & Materials) for each spindle. Correlation between the chromosome spread and the log of GFP-Dgt2 intensity is significant (r = −0.772, p<0.01, n = 26).</p

    Augmin facilitates the generation of microtubules near spindle poles.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Timing of the first microtubule assembly from nuclear envelope breakdown in wild-type and <i>wacΔ</i> mutant oocytes. The error bars are SEM. n≄11, p = 0.06. (B) Normalised tubulin intensity plots along the long axis of the wild-type and <i>wacΔ</i> mutant spindles. Pixel intensity was measured along a line from one pole to the other as in the diagrams below. Box plots show the central 50% of the data (box), the median (central bisecting line), and 1.5X the interquartile range (whiskers). The tubulin intensity of the sub-polar spindle regions (the regions 3,8) relative to that of the equator region (5,6) is significantly lower in the <i>wacΔ</i> mutant than wild type (p<0.01). (C) Spindle poles are often missing or weak in <i>wacΔ</i> oocytes expressing GFP-tubulin, while they are robust in wild-type oocytes expressing GFP-tubulin. Scale bar = 10 ”m. (D) The frequencies of various spindle morphologies in wild-type and <i>wacΔ</i> oocytes expressing GFP-tubulin. The spindles with at least one weak or missing pole were significantly more frequent in the <i>wac</i> mutant (p<0.01, n≄48).</p

    Chromosomes fail to congress in <i>wac</i> mutant oocytes.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Chromosome movement in wild-type and <i>wacΔ</i> oocytes expressing Rcc1-mCherry. Scale bar = 10 ”m. Time = min:sec. (B) The degree of chromosome congression in wild-type and <i>wacΔ</i> oocytes. The spread of the chromosome mass along the spindle axis, excluding the 4<sup>th</sup> chromosome (the double arrow in the diagram), in six oocytes each plotted from nuclear envelope breakdown (time 0) over time.</p

    <i>irf8</i> mutant embryos have no macrophages but produce excessive neutrophils.

    No full text
    <p>(A) <i>mfap4</i> RNA expression at 2 dpf shows a complete loss of macrophages in <i>irf8</i> mutant but abundant macrophages in heterozygous sibling (arrows). (B) <i>mpx</i> RNA expression at 2 dpf shows an overproduction of neutrophils in <i>irf8</i> mutants (arrows, bottom panels) compared with the sibling (arrow, top panels). Right column in A and B shows a higher magnification image of the trunk region from the same embryos depicted in the left column. (C) Neutrophils can first be detected on the yolk sac by 1 dpf. <i>irf8</i> mutants have many yolk sac neutrophils (arrows) compared with sibling. (D) At 2 dpf, <i>irf8</i> mutants continue to have more neutrophils on the yolk sac (arrows). Overall, <i>irf8</i> mutants appear to have more neutrophils throughout the body. All scale bars are 100 um.</p

    Specific expression of <i>irf8</i> in macrophage or neutrophil lineage is sufficient to restore macrophage fates in <i>irf8</i> mutants.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Neutral red staining for microglia at 4 dpf in <i>irf8</i> siblings and mutants in control uninjected conditions or after tol2-mediated expression of <i>irf8</i> driven by tissue specific regulatory sequences. Expression of <i>mpeg1</i>:<i>irf8</i> or <i>lyz</i>:<i>irf8</i> was sufficient to restore some microglia in <i>irf8</i> mutants (arrows), but not expression in the neurons (<i>huc</i>) or skin (<i>krt4</i>). (B) Analysis of total macrophage population by <i>mfap4</i> RNA expression at 2.5 dpf after expression of <i>irf8</i> in different tissues. Specific expression of <i>mpeg1</i>:<i>irf8</i> or <i>lyz</i>:<i>irf8</i> was also sufficient to restore macrophages on yolk sac and embryo proper (arrows) in <i>irf8</i> mutants. (C) Plot showing frequency of microglia rescue. (D) Plot showing frequency of macrophage recovery. Purple denotes >25 macrophages and green shows partial recovery of less than 25 but more than 1. Numbers below bar graphs represent <i>n</i>, total number of embryos analyzed. sib, <i>irf8</i><sup><i>+/+</i></sup> and <i>irf8</i><sup><i>+/-</i></sup>; mut, <i>irf8</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup>.</p

    <i>irf8</i> mutants have immature myeloid cells and excess myeloid cell death during development in the CHT.

    No full text
    <p>Diagram of a zebrafish larva showing the regions of analysis in the CHT: red box, region in A and B; blue box, region in C and D; and dotted lines in blue box indicate area of TUNEL quantification in E. (A-B) Lateral view. Right panels, higher magnification of the dotted box shown on the left. Analysis at 2.5 dpf (A) and 5 dpf (B) shows that siblings have many macrophages strongly expressing <i>mpeg1</i>:<i>EGFP</i>; these cells have elaborate processes and complex morphologies, and some have migrated into other tissues (white arrows). By contrast, <i>irf8</i> mutants have cells weakly expressing <i>mpeg1</i>:<i>EGFP</i> that appear immature and different from macrophages in siblings. A few strongly expressing cells are first detected in mutants at 5 dpf (B, blue arrows), indicating recovery of a few macrophages. (C-D) Early myeloid reporter <i>pu</i>.<i>1</i>:<i>gal4-UAS-GFP</i> at 5 dpf shows abnormally small cellular specks restricted to the CHT in all mutants (D, arrows, n = 9/9 at 3 and 5 dpf) but not in the siblings (C, n = 5/5 at 3 and 5 dpf). Bottom, TUNEL labeling of apoptotic cells at 5 dpf. The small <i>pu</i>.<i>1</i> reporter expressing cellular specks in the CHT are similar in size and appearance to small-sized dying cells labeled by TUNEL, which are shown in another 5 dpf stage-matched <i>irf8</i> mutant larva (compare arrows in top panel with arrowheads in bottom panel from different larvae). TUNEL labeling (middle) and area traces of the TUNEL+ nuclei (bottom) are shown for each genotype. (E) Quantification of TUNEL assay as represented in C-D shows a significant increase in total dying cells in the CHT of <i>irf8</i> mutants (n = 3) compared with siblings (n = 6; p = 0.0039). This is largely accounted for by a significant increase in very small-sized TUNEL+ cells measuring less than 26 pixels in area (p = 0.0017). No significant difference was found in larger TUNEL+ cells (≄ 26 pixels in area, p = 0.16). Error bars represent S.E.M. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test. **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05; n.s., not significant; CHT, caudal hematopoietic tissue. All scale bars are 50 um and are the same for each set of panels.</p

    TALEN-induced <i>irf8</i> mutations <i>st95</i> and <i>st96</i> eliminate embryonic microglia but allow survival to adulthood.

    No full text
    <p>(A) TALE nucleases target region near <i>irf8</i> translational start site, creating frameshift mutations <i>st95</i> and <i>st96</i>, which introduced premature stop codons as shown (bottom). Top panels show representative neutral red staining for microglia in <i>irf8</i><sup><i>st95/st95</i></sup> mutant that lacks all microglia, compared with a heterozygous sibling that has a wildtype microglial population (arrow). (B) Analysis of <i>apoe</i> RNA expression by in situ hybridization shows presence of microglia in <i>irf8</i> sibling but no microglia in <i>irf8</i> mutants at 3 and 6 dpf. (C) Images of heterozygous and homozygous mutant larvae at 5 dpf, showing that the mutants have normal overall morphology. Images of the whole adult zebrafish were compiled from two tiled images of the same fish. At 3 months of age, the <i>irf8</i> mutant zebrafish grew to a similar size as its sibling. All images represent the <i>st95</i> allele. Scale bars are shown below each set of panels or for each individual panel.</p

    Partial recovery of macrophages in <i>irf8</i> mutants begins by ~7 dpf in the head region.

    No full text
    <p>Diagrams of zebrafish showing region of quantification (pink box), which was taken using the same magnification and field size of view at all stages. The field of view in older stages covers a relatively smaller region of the head because the fish are larger (comparing B with A). Red dotted box shows the region of the fluorescent images. (A) Expression of macrophage reporter <i>mpeg1</i>:<i>EGFP</i> at 6 and 7 dpf. Arrows show macrophages. At 6 dpf, most <i>irf8</i> mutants have no macrophages in the CHT (n = 7/12), while most have a few macrophages in the head (n = 10/13); image shows the head region of a mutant at 6 dpf with no macrophages. Panels show the tail CHT region of the <i>irf8</i> mutants at 6 and 7 dpf with no macrophages; a few autofluorescent pigment cells are present after PTU treatment. (B) Distribution of macrophages expressing <i>mpeg1</i>:<i>EGFP</i> at 14 dpf and 31 dpf. Arrows point to macrophages. (C) Quantification of the number of macrophages per field in the head region over time (pink box in left diagram). (D) Quantification of the number of macrophages per field in the tail region over time (pink box in right diagram). At 6 dpf, n = 20 for siblings and n = 13 for mutants; at 14 dpf, n = 8 for siblings and n = 7 for mutants; at 31 dpf, n = 7 for siblings and n = 5 for mutants. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test. Error bars represent S.E.M. ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05; CHT, caudal hematopoietic tissue; E, eye. All scale bars are 50 um. <i>irf8</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> in this figure represents trans-heterozygous <i>irf8</i><sup><i>st95/st96</i></sup> mutants.</p
    corecore