Sex Differences in Health Related Quality of Life in Head & Neck Cancer One Year After Treatment

Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) makes up about 3% of all cancers and is treated with systemic therapy, radiation, surgery, or a combination of these. HNC treatment can be associated with decreased patient reported health related quality of life (HR-QoL), which can lead to depression. The majority of studies found that females reported worse patient reported HR-QoL than males, however, there were a few that did not have a significant difference in overall patient reported QoL. With the discovery of patient oriented outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice affecting patient satisfaction, provider-patient relationship, and overall patient mortality, it is vital to include PROs in the creation of treatment plans. Objectives: The objectives of this project are to highlight the differences in HR-QoL between men and women. Ultimately, using these PROs clinically will help to improve patient care, augment patient-provider trust, and optimize treatment plans. Using PROs and recognizing where unconscious biases of providers come into play is pinnacle, and this project aims to highlight how men and women\u27s experiences are different in the treatment of HNC. Methods: Participants were given the FACT-H&N instrument one year after treatment for head and neck cancer at a single tertiary academic center to assess different aspects of Hr-QoL. Sex differences were analyzed between the groups. A Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was performed to assess associations with sex and survey responses, as well as to assess associations with total laryngectomy and survey responses. Results: There were 100 participants from a single academic center of which 73% were men and 27% women. Several of the questions had significant differences between men and women: I feel ill (P=0.0299), I am satisfied with my family communication about my illness P=0.0075), I am satisfied with my sex life (P=0.0496), My voice has its usual quality and strength (P=0.0057), I can swallow naturally and easily (P=0.0437), and I can eat solid foods (P=0.0248). There were no significant differences between men and women with laryngectomies. Conclusions: Overall, men felt more ill, were less satisfied with their sex lives, were less likely to feel a normal strength and quality of voice, felt decreased ability to swallow normally, and felt they could not eat solid foods; women were less satisfied with communication about their disease to their families. For those who had undergone laryngectomy, there were no significant differences between men and women. Different aspects of quality of life for men and women are affected by head and neck cancer. Monitoring PROs are becoming increasingly standard of care for patients, and providers need to be equipped understand how to interpret data accordingly and understand the inherent biases

Disparities in the Uptake of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Surge in a Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Cancer Population by Patient Demographic Characteristics and Socioeconomic Status

This cohort study examines the association between patient demographic characteristics and socioeconomic status and engagement in telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic

Real time patient-reported outcome measures in patients with cancer: Early experience within an integrated health system

BACKGROUND: While patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have benefit in cancer clinical trials, real-world applications are lacking. This study describes the method of implementation of a cancer enterprise-wide PROMs platform. METHODS: After establishing a multispecialty stakeholder group within a large integrated health system, domain-specific instruments were selected from the National Institutes of Health\u27s Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments (pain interference, fatigue, physical function, and depression) and were administered at varying frequencies throughout each patient\u27s cancer journey. All cancer patients with an oncologic visit were eligible to complete the PROMs prior to the visit using a patient portal, or at the time of the visit using a tablet. PROMs were integrated into clinical workflow. Clinical partnerships were essential for successful implementation. Descriptive preliminary data were compared using multivariable logistic regression to determine the factors associated with method of PROMs completion. RESULTS: From September 16, 2020 to July 23, 2021, 23 of 38 clinical units (60.5%) implemented PROMs over 2392 encounters and 1666 patients. Approximately one third of patients (n = 629, 37.8%) used the patient portal. Black patients (aOR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.97) and patients residing in zip codes with higher percentage of unemployment (aOR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.41) were among the least likely to complete PROMs using the patient portal. CONCLUSIONS: Successful system-wide implementation of PROMs among cancer patients requires engagement from multispecialty stakeholders and investment from clinical partners. Attention to the method of PROMs collection is required in order to reduce the potential for disparities, such as Black populations and those residing in areas with high levels of unemployment

Evaluating Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes in Salvage Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer

Background: Unique challenges surround treatment for residual or recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Of the limited treatment options for residual or recurrent HNSCC, salvage surgery is often the best option. However, salvage surgery can result in significant morbidity, affecting both quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes. Few studies have examined QoL outcomes following salvage surgery in the setting of HNSCC. Objectives: To analyze head and neck related quality of life and functional outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer who underwent salvage surgery. Methods: In this IRB approved study, FACT-HN Version 4 was administered pre-operatively and 6 months post-operatively to patients undergoing salvage surgery for HNSCC between November 4, 2014 and April 27, 2020. Retrospective cohort analysis was performed on this population with major outcome being postoperative QoL score. Functional outcomes included postoperative tracheostomy and feeding tube status. QoL outcomes were compared with paired t-tests. Univariate logistic regression was used to determine characteristics associated with presence of permanent tracheostomy and feeding tube, defined as presence greater than 30 days. Results: Overall, 25 patients undergoing salvage surgery for HNSCC were included in this analysis. Primary tumor sites were larynx/hypopharynx (44.0%), oral cavity (24.0%), oropharynx (20.0%), salivary (4.0%), skin (4.0%), and unknown primary (4.0%). Salvage surgeries consisted of total laryngectomy (36.0%), definitive neck dissection (24.0%), mandibulectomy (16.0%), parotidectomy (8.0%), with total laryngectomy/total glossectomy, radical tonsillectomy, TORS base of tongue excision, and transoral laser laryngeal excision all comprising 4% of cases. Total QoL scores were not significantly different preoperatively to postoperatively (mean 108.7, 95% CI=97.7 to 119.7 vs. 103.8, 95% CI: 93.1 to 114.5; P=0.436, with maximum total score of 148). Patients with lower preoperative Emotional Well-Being (EWB) subscores demonstrated significantly worse EWB subscores postoperatively (postoperative mean: 17.0, 95% CI: 14.5 to 19.4 vs. 21.7, 95% CI: 20.0 to 23.4; P=0.002). Of patients who underwent tracheostomy tube placement, 53.8% (N=7/13) remained tracheostomy dependent long-term (\u3e30 d). Of patients who underwent feeding tube placement, 81.0% (N=17/21) remained feeding tube dependent long-term (\u3e30 d). Tracheostomy and feeding tubes remained in place with median durations of 3.02 months (range 0.16 to 20.55) and 10.13 months (range 0 to 24.89), respectively. All patients with T3/4 disease undergoing salvage surgery required long-term feeding tube (N=6). Conclusions: This study provides important information about quality of life and functional outcomes for patients undergoing salvage surgery for HNSCC. There is a high rate of long-term tracheostomy and feeding tube dependence following salvage surgery. While no difference was found in head and neck related quality of life total score and sub-scores at 6 months postoperatively, general emotional well-being preoperatively was most associated with general emotional well-being postoperatively. This information should be taken into consideration when counseling and managing patients with residual or recurrent HNSCC

Cetuximab and anemia prevention in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation is associated with increased production of interleukin 6 (IL6), which is intensified by radiotherapy (RT) induced inflammatory response. Elevated IL6 levels intensifies RT-induced anemia by upregulating hepcidin causing functional iron deficiency. Cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor, has been associated with lower rates of anemia for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We hypothesized that concomitant cetuximab could prevent RT-induced anemia. METHODS: We queried our institutional head and neck cancers database for non-metastatic HNSCC cases that received RT with concomitant cetuximab or RT-only between 2006 and 2018. Cetuximab was administered for some high-risk cases medically unfit for platinum agents per multidisciplinary team evaluation. We only included patients who had at least one complete blood count in the 4 months preceding and after RT. We compared the prevalence of anemia (defined as hemoglobin (Hb) below 12 g/dL in females and 13 g/dL in males) and mean Hb levels at baseline and after RT. Improvement of anemia/Hb (resolution of baseline anemia and/or an increase of baseline Hb ≥1 g/dL after RT), and overall survival (OS) in relation to anemia/Hb dynamics were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were identified equally distributed between cetuximab-plus-RT and RT-only groups. The cetuximab-plus-RT group had more locally-advanced stage, oropharyngeal and high grade tumors (p \u3c 0.001 for all). Baseline anemia/Hb were similar, however anemia after RT conclusion was higher in the cetuximab-plus-RT vs RT-only (63.5% vs. 44.2%; p = 0.017), with a mean Hb of 11.98 g/dL vs. 12.9 g/dL; p = 0.003, for both respectively. This contributed to significantly worse anemia/Hb improvement for cetuximab-plus-RT (18.8% vs. 37.2%; p = 0.007). This effect was maintained after adjusting for other factors in multivariate analysis. The prevalence of iron, vitamin-B12 and folate deficiencies; and chronic kidney disease, was non-different. Baseline anemia was associated with worse OS (p = 0.0052) for the whole study cohort. Nevertheless, improvement of anemia/Hb was only marginally associated with better OS (p = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, cetuximab was not associated with lower rates of anemia after RT for nonmetastatic HNSCC patients compared to RT-alone. Dedicated prospective studies are needed to elucidate the effect of cetuximab on RT-induced anemia

Barriers and facilitators to vaccination uptake against COVID-19, influenza, and pneumococcal pneumonia in immunosuppressed adults with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A qualitative interview study during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objectives To explore barriers and facilitators to COVID-19, influenza, and pneumococcal vaccine uptake in immunosuppressed adults with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Methods Recruiting through national patient charities and a local hospital, participants were invited to take part in an in-depth, one-to-one, semi-structured interview with a trained qualitative researcher between November 2021 and January 2022. Data were analysed thematically in NVivo, cross-validated by a second coder and mapped to the SAGE vaccine hesitancy matrix. Results Twenty participants (75% female, 20% non-white) were recruited. Barriers and facilitators spanned contextual, individual/group and vaccine/vaccination-specific factors. Key facilitators to all vaccines were higher perceived infection risk and belief that vaccination is beneficial. Key barriers to all vaccines were belief that vaccination could trigger IMID flare, and active IMID. Key facilitators specific to COVID-19 vaccines included media focus, high incidence, mass-vaccination programme with visible impact, social responsibility, and healthcare professionals' (HCP) confirmation of the new vaccines' suitability for their IMID. Novel vaccine technology was a concern, not a barrier. Key facilitators of influenza/pneumococcal vaccines were awareness of eligibility, direct invitation, and, clear recommendation from trusted HCP. Key barriers of influenza/pneumococcal vaccines were unaware of eligibility, no direct invitation or recommendation from HCP, low perceived infection risk, and no perceived benefit from vaccination. Conclusions Numerous barriers and facilitators to vaccination, varying by vaccine-type, exist for immunosuppressed- IMID patients. Addressing vaccine benefits and safety for IMID-patients in clinical practice, direct invitation, and public-health messaging highlighting immunosuppression as key vaccination-eligibility criteria may optimise uptake, although further research should assess this

Communicating with providers about racial healthcare disparities: The role of providers’ prior beliefs on their receptivity to different narrative frames

Objective Evaluate narratives aimed at motivating providers with different pre-existing beliefs to address racial healthcare disparities. Methods Survey experiment with 280 providers. Providers were classified as high or low in attributing disparities to providers (HPA versus LPA) and were randomly assigned to a non-narrative control or 1 of 2 narratives: “Provider Success” (provider successfully resolved problem involving Black patient) and “Provider Bias” (Black patient experienced racial bias, which remained unresolved). Participants' reactions to narratives (including identification with narrative) and likelihood of participating in disparities-reduction activities were immediately assessed. Four weeks later, participation in those activities was assessed, including self-reported participation in a disparities-reduction training course (primary outcome). Results Participation in training was higher among providers randomized to the Provider Success narrative compared to Provider Bias or Control. LPA participants had higher identification with Provider Success than Provider Bias narratives, whereas among HPA participants, differences in identification between the narratives were not significant. Conclusions Provider Success narratives led to greater participation in training than Provider Bias narratives, although providers’ pre-existing beliefs influenced the narrative they identified with. Practice implications Provider Success narratives may be more effective at motivating providers to address disparities than Provider Bias narratives, though more research is needed

Targeted next-generation sequencing on hirschsprung disease: A pilot study exploits DNA pooling

To adopt an efficient approach of identifying rare variants possibly related to Hirschsprung disease (HSCR), a pilot study was set up to evaluate the performance of a newly designed protocol for next generation targeted resquencing. In total, 20 Chinese HSCR patients and 20 Chinese sex-matched individuals with no HSCR were included, for which coding sequences (CDS) of 62 genes known to be in signaling pathways relevant to enteric nervous system development were selected for capture and sequencing. Blood DNAs from eight pools of five cases or controls were enriched by PCR-based RainDance technology (RDT) and then sequenced on a 454 FLX platform. As technical validation, five patients from case Pool-3 were also independently enriched by RDT, indexed with barcode and sequenced with sufficient coverage. Assessment for CDS single nucleotide variants showed DNA pooling performed well (specificity/sensitivity at 98.4%/83.7%) at the common variant level; but relatively worse (specificity/sensitivity at 65.5%/61.3%) at the rare variant level. Further Sanger sequencing only validated five out of 12 rare damaging variants likely involved in HSCR. Hence more improvement at variant detection and sequencing technology is needed to realize the potential of DNA pooling for large-scale resequencing projects. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/University College London.postprin

Integrating depth of invasion in T classification improves the prognostic performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer primary tumor staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND: The last revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual included a specific system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) of the head and neck. Here, we assessed the prognostic performance of six candidate modified T-classification models in head and neck CSCC patients. METHODS: Analysis of 916 patients with head and neck CSCC given treatment with curative intent at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1995 and 2019 was performed. The main outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS), and the impact of depth of invasion (DOI) was analyzed using multivariable regression models. Candidate models were developed using the optimal DOI cut points for each AJCC T classification based on goodness of fit of the model and the simplicity of the model. Staging systems were compared using Harrell\u27s concordance index. RESULTS: Median age was 70 years (range, 19-97years) and median follow-up time of 22 months (range, 1-250months). The median DOI was 6.0 mm (range, 0.1-70.0 mm). The five-year DSS rate was 80.7% (95%CI, 77.4-83.7%). We found significant association between DOI (hazard ratio, 1.21 [95%CI: 1.01-1.43]) and DSS on multivariable analysis. Based on a low Akaike information criterion score, improvement in the concordance index, and Kaplan-Meier curves, model 6 surpassed the AJCC staging system. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of DOI in the current AJCC staging system improves discrimination of T classifications in head and neck CSCC patients. LAY SUMMARY: The current staging system for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma demonstrates wide prognostic variability and provides suboptimal risk stratification. Incorporation of depth of invasion in the T-classification system improves risk prediction and patient counseling. PRECIS: We propose improved head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma T staging that will include depth of invasion and should be considered in future versions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer after external validation