Volvulus of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: A meta-narrative systematic review of frequency, diagnosis, and treatment outcomes

Background: Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical procedure of choice for medically refractory ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. While rare, a pouch volvulus can occur. We aimed to determine the frequency, presentation, and management approach of pouch volvulus in patients with IPAA. Methods: A systematic search of published literature was performed by a medical reference librarian on 10 August 2018 and two independent reviewers identified relevant publications, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality based on a validated tool. A retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic electronic medical records identified one case of pouch volvulus between January 2008 and August 2018. Results: The frequency of pouch volvulus from one large published study reporting long-term outcomes of IPAA was 0.18% (3/1,700). A total of 22 patients (18 ulcerative colitis) were included (median age 32 years, 73% females). Median time to volvulus after IPAA was 36 months while median interval to volvulus diagnosis from symptom onset was 24 hours. Abdominal pain was the most commonly reported symptom (76%). The diagnosis was made primarily by abdominal computed tomography (13/17 patients, 76%). Endoscopic treatment was successful in 1 of 11 patients (9%). Surgery was performed in 20 patients and pouch-pexy and pouch excision were the most frequent surgical operations. A redo IPAA was performed in five patients (25%). Conclusion: Pouch volvulus is a rare but serious complication of IPAA and should be suspected even in the absence of obstruction symptoms. Endoscopic treatment often fails and surgery is effective when performed early

New insights on the surgical management of ulcerative colitis in the 21st century

Despite substantial advances in medical therapy since 2005 that have led to the approval and increased use of novel biological agents and small molecules, colectomy is still a therapeutic option for some patients with ulcerative colitis. In the biological era (ie, after the approval of biological agents for ulcerative colitis), improved control of disease activity has led to a trend of decreasing colectomy rates for refractory disease. Consequently, indications for colectomy for dysplasia and colorectal cancer seem to be increasing. Advances have not only been made in surgical techniques, but also in multidisciplinary approaches, the timing of surgery, and in medical management before and after surgery. This Review discusses surgical indications in patients with ulcerative colitis in relation to current medical therapy, management in the acute setting, indications for staged procedures, new techniques such as transanal surgery and robotics, and surgical alternatives to ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. A multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, gastroenterologists, pathologists, radiologists, and clinical nutritionists is essential to improving patient outcomes in different clinical scenarios of ulcerative colitis management in the 21st century

Vedolizumab and early postoperative complications in nonintestinal surgery: a case-matched analysis

Background: Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-specific α4-β7 integrin antagonist that has demonstrated efficacy in Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The safety of VDZ in the perioperative period remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative complications and perioperative safety in VDZ-treated patients undergoing nonintestinal operations. Methods: A case-matched study was performed at two inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) referral centers. Adult patients with CD and UC who underwent a nonintestinal surgical procedure during treatment with VDZ were included. Patients who had their last VDZ infusion up to 12 weeks before the procedure were considered exposed and were matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients without VDZ therapy, according to type of surgical procedure, age, and sex. The primary outcome was overall risk of early postoperative infectious complications (up to 30 days after surgery), readmissions, reoperations, surgical site infections, and other infections. The VDZ and control groups were subsequently compared using the Pearson χ 2 test and Wilcoxon rank sum. Results: We identified 34 patients treated with VDZ who underwent 36 nonintestinal surgical procedures. These patients were matched with 36 control procedures. Postoperative complications were not different between the VDZ-treated and control cohorts for all outcomes analyzed: infectious complications occurred in 14% versus 8% ( p = 0.45), superficial surgical site infections 6% versus 0% ( p = 0.15), reoperations 6% versus 3% ( p = 0.56) and readmissions 11% versus 6% ( p = 0.37). Conclusions: VDZ-treated patients with IBD undergoing nonintestinal procedures did not have an increased risk of overall postoperative infections or other complications compared with matched controls

Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Infusion for the Treatment of Respiratory Failure From COVID-19: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Dosing Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BM-MSC)-derived extracellular vesicles, ExoFlo, convey the immunomodulatory and regenerative properties of intact BM-MSCs. This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of ExoFlo as treatment for moderate to severe ARDS in patients with severe COVID-19. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do two doses of ExoFlo safely reduce mortality in COVID-19-associated moderate to severe ARDS compared with placebo? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective phase II, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled dosing trial was conducted at five sites across the United States with infusions of placebo, 10 mL of ExoFlo, or 15 mL of ExoFlo on days 1 and 4. Patients (N = 102) with COVID-19-associated moderate to severe ARDS were enrolled and randomized to treatment. Adverse events were documented throughout the study. The primary outcome measure was all-cause 60-day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included time to death (overall mortality); the incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events; proportion of discharged patients at 7, 30, and 60 days; time to hospital discharge; and ventilation-free days. RESULTS: No treatment-related adverse events were reported. Mortality (60-day) in the intention-to-treat population was reduced with 15 mL ExoFlo mixed with 85 mL normal saline (ExoFlo-15) compared with placebo (not significant, χ INTERPRETATION: The 15 mL dose of ExoFlo is safe in patients with severe or critical COVID-19-associated respiratory failure. In participants aged 18 to 65 years, the risk reduction in 60-day mortality was further improved from subjects of all ages in the intention-to-treat population after two doses of 15 mL of ExoFlo compared with placebo. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04493242; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov