20 research outputs found

    Global and Local Processing in Adult Humans (Homo Sapiens), 5-year Old Children (Homo Sapiens), and Adult Cotton Top Tamarins (Saguinus Oedipus)

    Get PDF
    This study compared adults (Homo sapiens), young children (Homo sapiens), and adult tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) while they discriminated global and local properties of stimuli. Subjects were trained to discriminate a circle made of circle elements from a square made of square elements and were tested with circles made of squares and squares made of circles. Adult humans showed a global bias in testing that was unaffected by the density of the elements in the stimuli. Children showed a global bias with dense displays but discriminated by both local and global properties with sparse displays. Adult tamarins’ biases matched those of the children. The striking similarity between the perceptual processing of adult monkeys and humans diagnosed with autism and the difference between this and normatively developing human perception is discussed

    Glutamate receptor autoimmune diseases: Understanding the mechanisms, determining the epitopes, and developing better tests

    No full text
    Anti-NMDA receptor and anti-AMPA receptor encephalitis are two recently discovered autoimmune disorders in which patients develop antibodies to ionotropic glutamate receptors. These antibodies cause varied and severe neurologic and psychiatric symptoms. Both disorders are treatable with immunosuppression. Little is know about the mechanisms by which these antibodies cause the disorders or the sites to which antibodies bind on their target receptors. Here, we use a variety of molecular biological, biochemical, and electrophysiological techniques to study the binding site of patients\u27 antibodies and the effects of antibody binding, with the dual goals of determining how antibodies cause disease and developing better methods to test antibodies. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis antibodies bind to the bottom lobe of the amino terminal domain (ATD) of the GluN1 subunit of the NMDA receptor and show specific dependence on amino acid identity of a small region within the bottom lobe. Antibody binding is dependent on ATD conformation, and stabilizes the open conformation of the receptor. Within three hours of binding and continuing in severity over twenty-four hours, antibody causes a titer-dependent decrease in surface receptor expression. This decrease is mediated by proteasomal activity and partially mitigated by increased protein synthesis, and causes an increase in basal calcium concentration within neurons. Similarly, anti-AMPAR encephalitis cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) antibodies bind to the bottom lobe of the ATD of the GluA1 or GluA2 subunits. These antibodies appear to be less conformation sensitive, as denatured fusion proteins expressing AMPAR domains can be recognized by patient antibody on western blot. Fusion proteins also reveal significant variability between the antibody response of serum and CSF, and the serum antibody population appears to change over disease progression. The consequences of this serum variability are unknown; fusion proteins may represent an ideal tool to explore this question. Together, these results significantly increase our understanding of anti-NMDAR and anti-AMPAR encephalitis, although considerable work remains to fully understand these complex and evolving disorders

    Glutamate receptor autoimmune diseases: Understanding the mechanisms, determining the epitopes, and developing better tests

    No full text
    Anti-NMDA receptor and anti-AMPA receptor encephalitis are two recently discovered autoimmune disorders in which patients develop antibodies to ionotropic glutamate receptors. These antibodies cause varied and severe neurologic and psychiatric symptoms. Both disorders are treatable with immunosuppression. Little is know about the mechanisms by which these antibodies cause the disorders or the sites to which antibodies bind on their target receptors. Here, we use a variety of molecular biological, biochemical, and electrophysiological techniques to study the binding site of patients\u27 antibodies and the effects of antibody binding, with the dual goals of determining how antibodies cause disease and developing better methods to test antibodies. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis antibodies bind to the bottom lobe of the amino terminal domain (ATD) of the GluN1 subunit of the NMDA receptor and show specific dependence on amino acid identity of a small region within the bottom lobe. Antibody binding is dependent on ATD conformation, and stabilizes the open conformation of the receptor. Within three hours of binding and continuing in severity over twenty-four hours, antibody causes a titer-dependent decrease in surface receptor expression. This decrease is mediated by proteasomal activity and partially mitigated by increased protein synthesis, and causes an increase in basal calcium concentration within neurons. Similarly, anti-AMPAR encephalitis cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) antibodies bind to the bottom lobe of the ATD of the GluA1 or GluA2 subunits. These antibodies appear to be less conformation sensitive, as denatured fusion proteins expressing AMPAR domains can be recognized by patient antibody on western blot. Fusion proteins also reveal significant variability between the antibody response of serum and CSF, and the serum antibody population appears to change over disease progression. The consequences of this serum variability are unknown; fusion proteins may represent an ideal tool to explore this question. Together, these results significantly increase our understanding of anti-NMDAR and anti-AMPAR encephalitis, although considerable work remains to fully understand these complex and evolving disorders

    Astrocytic therapies for neuronal repair in stroke

    No full text
    Stroke is a leading cause of disability and death worldwide. Much of the work on improving stroke recovery has focused on preventing neuronal loss; however, these approaches have repeatedly failed in clinical trials. Conversely, relatively little is known about the mechanisms of repair and recovery after stroke. Stroke causes an initial process of local scar formation that confines the damage, and a later and limited process of tissue repair that involves the formation of new connections and new blood vessels. Astrocytes are central to both scar formation and to tissue repair after stroke. Astrocytes regulate the synapses and blood vessels within their cellular projections, or domain, and both respond to and release neuroimmune molecules in response to damage. Despite this central role in brain function, astrocytes have been largely neglected in the pursuit of effective stroke therapeutics. Here, we will review the changes astrocytes undergo in response to stroke, both beneficial and detrimental, and discuss possible points of intervention to promote recovery
    corecore