9 research outputs found

    Hydrophobic nature and effects of culture conditions on biofilm formation by the cellulolytic actinomycete <em>Thermobifida fusca</em>

    No full text
    Thermobifida fusca produces a firmly attached biofilm on nutritive and non-nutritive surfaces, such as cellulose, glass, plastic, metal and Teflon&reg;. The ability to bind to surfaces has been suggested as a competitive advantage for microbes in soil environments. Results of previous investigations indicated that a Gram-positive cellulolytic soil bacteria, Cellulomonas uda, a facultative aerobe, specifically adhered to nutritive surfaces forming biofilms, but cells did not colonize non-nutritive surfaces. Cell surface hydrophobicity has been implicated in the interactions between bacteria and the adhesion to surfaces. It was recently described that the cellulolytic actinomycete T. fusca cells hydrophobicity was measured and compared to the cellulolytic soil bacteria C. uda. Also, T. fusca biofilm formation on non-nutritive surface, such as polyvinyl chloride, was examined by testing various culture ingredients to determine a possible trigger mechanism for biofilm formation. Experimental results showed that partitioning of bacterial cells to various hydrocarbons was higher in T. fusca cells than in C. uda. The results of this study suggest that the attachment to multiple surfaces by T. fusca could depend on nutrient availability, pH, salt concentrations, and the higher hydrophobic nature of bacterial cells. Possibly, these characteristics may confer T. fusca a selective advantage to compete and survive among the many environments it thrives

    CSLM analysis of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> biofilm production.

    No full text
    <p>Results presented are the means ±SD from two independent experiments performed in triplicate.</p><p>Student's <i>t-test</i> indicated a statistically significant difference between biofilm thickness formed by <i>L. monocytogenes</i> 10403S compared to mutant bacterial strains (p ≤ 0.05).</p><p>CSLM analysis of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> biofilm production.</p

    Identified <i>L. monocytogenes</i> biofilm-formation genes.

    No full text
    <p><i>Putative functions were obtained from <a href="http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/listeria_group/MultiHome.html" target="_blank">http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/listeria_group/MultiHome.html</a></i>.</p><p><i>Based on DNA homologies with the L. monocytogenes 10403S genome database; lmrg refers to genetic loci within strain 10403S</i>.</p><p><i>% Compared to wild-type L. monocytogenes 10403S biofilm formation in two independent experiments</i>.</p><p>Identified <i>L. monocytogenes</i> biofilm-formation genes.</p

    Transmission and scanning electron microscopy analysis of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> EPS production.

    No full text
    <p><i>L. monocytogenes</i> 10403S bacteria in biofilms formed on dialysis tubing membranes (regenerated cellulose) (A) (bar = 100 nm) or planktonic bacteria grown in broth culture (B) (bar = 500 nm) were examined by TEM at 72 hours post-inoculation. (C) SEM of a <i>L. monocytogenes</i> biofilm developed on regenerated cellulose at 24 hours post-inoculation (bar = 10 µm). Arrows indicate EPS. For TEM, samples were fixed with 25% glutaraldehyde, rinsed with cacodylate buffer and stained with ruthenium red to visualize EPS material. For SEM, samples were rinsed with multiple dilutions of ethanol prior to visualization.</p

    Biofilm formation by Δ<i>phoPR</i> and Δ<i>dltABCD L. monocytogenes</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Bacterial strains were inoculated into TSBYE media in 96-well plates and grown at 35°C for 24 hours. Cultures were then diluted 1:10 into fresh HTM media with 3% glucose and 0.1 mg/mL each cysteine and methionine in new 96-well PVC microtiter plates. Plates were incubated at 35°C for 96 hours, rinsed with dH<sub>2</sub>O using a semi-automated cell washer, stained with crystal violet, rinsed with acetic acid and the OD<sub>595</sub> ±SD determined using a spectrophotometer. The data presented are representative of three independent experiments. *, p <0.05 (One-way ANOVA test).</p

    Scanning electron microscopy of a bean sprout inoculated with <i>L. monocytogenes</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Sterile bean sprouts were placed in HTM agar media with 3% glucose and inoculated with 10 µl of a 1:10 dilution of a 24-hour culture of 10403S. Following a 24 hour incubation, bean sprouts were processed for scanning electron microscopy (A) Bean sprout (bar = 1 mm) (B) magnified view of the white square from (A) (bar = 100 µm). (C) Bean sprout vegetative tissue colonized with <i>L. monocytogenes</i> (bar = 10 µm) (D) magnification of (C) (bar = 10 µm).</p
    corecore