Gastric greater curvature plication combined with Nissen fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity

Background and aim: Established anti-reflux procedures such as fundoplications are less efficient in obese patients. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical effectiveness of the fundoplication combined with gastric greater curvature plication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in obese patients. Materials and methods: During the period from June 2010 to September 2014, patients operated for GERD with BMI from 30 to 39.9 kg/m2 were included into the prospective study. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF, n = 58) was performed until February 2013 and later laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication was combined with gastric greater curvature plication (LNFGP, n = 56). The groups were compared according to the control of GERD and weight loss. Results: In LNF group there were significantly more males, patients had lower BMI and longer duration of GERD symptoms. Duration of surgery was significantly longer in LNFGP group, 96.5 (17.3) min vs. 59.8 (16.1) min (P < 0.0001). Postoperative morbidity was similar, 3.6% and 3.4% in LNFGP and LNF groups, respectively (P = 0.9539). The average percentage of excess BMI loss after 12 months was 45.3 (5.8) in LNFGP group as compared to 18.4 (4.6) in LNF group (P < 0.0001). Significantly more patients experienced remission or improvement of type 2 diabetes mellitus (P = 0.03) and hypercholesterolemia (P = 0.0001) in LNFGP group. No significant differences between the groups in postoperative DeMeester score, GERD-HRQL mean score, overall satisfaction and healing of esophagitis were observed

Risk factors of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after total gastrectomy

Background/AimEsophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) after total gastrectomy is one of the most frequent life-threatening complications. The rate of EJAL after total gastrectomy is about 2–11% worlwide. The aim of this study was to identify the independent prognostic risk factors that may predict EJAL progression for patients after total gastrectomy.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study analyzed medical records of 175 patients. All these patients had underwent radical gastrectomy due to gastric cancer. The analyzed factors were: age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) funtional class, splenectomy, anastomosis technique, operative time, cancer stage, the number of dissected lymph nodes, the number of metastatic lymph nodes, resection margins. White blood cells count, C reactive protein (CRP) value, body temperature, drain output were calculated in the early postoperative period.ResultsThe average age of the patients was 63.2 ± 11.5 years. The EJAL rate was found to be 6.3%. The mortality rate among patients who developed EJAL was 9%. Postoperative laboratory and clinical findings significantly related to EJAL were the average temperature of 4 postoperative days &gt;37.2 oC (p = 0.018), postoperative white blood cell count &gt;16.7 x 109/l (p = 0.031), postoperative CRP level &gt;160 mg/l (p = 0.001) and operative time &gt;248 min (p = 0.009), although the binary logistic regression analysis revealed that none of these variables can be used as statisticaly significant predictors for EJAL.ConclusionsThe esofagojejunal anastomotic leakage rate of 6.3% was found among patients undergoing radical gastrectomy due to gastric carcinoma. Mortality rate in case of EJAL increases up to 9%. In our study, we didn’t find any independent predictors for EJAL.Key words: gastrectomy, esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage, risk factorsEzofagojejuninės jungties nesandarumo išsivystymo rizikos veiksniai po gastrektomijosĮvadasEzofagojejuninės jungties nesandarumas (EJJN) po gastrektomijos yra viena iš didžiausią grėsmę gyvybei keliančių komplikacijų. Mokslinių tyrimų duomenimis, EJJN dažnis svyruoja nuo 2 iki 11 %. Darbo tikslas – nustatyti rizikos veiksnius,darančius įtaką ezofagojejuninės jungties nesandarumo vystymuisi po gastrektomijos dėl skrandžio vėžio, ir prognozuoti jų įtaką EJJN išsivystymui.Ligoniai ir metodaiRetrospektyviai ištirta 175 pacientų medicininė dokumentacija. Tirtiems pacientams 2006–2010 metais atlikta gastrektomija dėl skrandžio vėžio. Analizuoti veiksniai: amžius, lytis, Amerikos anesteziologų asociacijos (ASA) funkcinė klasė, splenektomija, jungties susiuvimo būdas, operacijos trukmė, naviko stadija, operacijos metu pašalintų limfmazgių skaičius, limfmazgių su mestazėmis skaičius, rezekciniai kraštai. Ankstyvuoju pooperaciniu laikotarpiu vertinta leukocitų kiekis, C reaktyviojo baltymo (CRB) koncentracija kraujyje, pooperacinė temperatūra, sekrecija pro drenus.RezultataiTirtų pacientų amžiaus vidurkis 63,2±11,5 metų. Vyrų 50,6 %, moterų 49,4 %. EJJN dažnis 6,3 %. Turėjusių EJJN pacientų mirtingumas siekė 9 %. Nustatyti rizikos veiksniai, statistiškai patikimai susiję su EJJN išsivystymu. Jų reikšmės patikslintosrandant ROC kreivės lūžio taškus: 4 parų vidutinė temperatūra 37,15oC (p=0,018), maksimalios leukocitų (11,7x109/l, p=0,031) ir C reaktyviojo baltymo reikšmės (159,95 mg/l, p=0,001), operacijos trukmė 247,5 min (p=0,009). Tačiau binarinė logistinė regresija parodė, kad šie kriterijai negali būti statistiškai patikimi prognoziniai EJJN vystymosi veiksniai.IšvadosEzofagojejuninės jungties nesandarumo dažnis po gastrektomijos dėl skrandžio vėžio yra 6,3%, šią komplikaciją turėjusių pacientų mirštamumas – 9%. Savo tyrime neradome prognostiškai reikšmingų rizikos veiksnių.Reikšminiai žodžiai: gastrektomija, ezofagojejuninės jungties nesandarumas, rizikos veiksnia

Risk factors of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after total gastrectomy

Background/AimEsophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) after total gastrectomy is one of the most frequent life-threatening complications. The rate of EJAL after total gastrectomy is about 2–11% worlwide. The aim of this study was to identify the independent prognostic risk factors that may predict EJAL progression for patients after total gastrectomy.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study analyzed medical records of 175 patients. All these patients had underwent radical gastrectomy due to gastric cancer. The analyzed factors were: age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) funtional class, splenectomy, anastomosis technique, operative time, cancer stage, the number of dissected lymph nodes, the number of metastatic lymph nodes, resection margins. White blood cells count, C reactive protein (CRP) value, body temperature, drain output were calculated in the early postoperative period.ResultsThe average age of the patients was 63.2 ± 11.5 years. The EJAL rate was found to be 6.3%. The mortality rate among patients who developed EJAL was 9%. Postoperative laboratory and clinical findings significantly related to EJAL were the average temperature of 4 postoperative days &gt;37.2 oC (p = 0.018), postoperative white blood cell count &gt;16.7 x 109/l (p = 0.031), postoperative CRP level &gt;160 mg/l (p = 0.001) and operative time &gt;248 min (p = 0.009), although the binary logistic regression analysis revealed that none of these variables can be used as statisticaly significant predictors for EJAL.ConclusionsThe esofagojejunal anastomotic leakage rate of 6.3% was found among patients undergoing radical gastrectomy due to gastric carcinoma. Mortality rate in case of EJAL increases up to 9%. In our study, we didn’t find any independent predictors for EJAL.Key words: gastrectomy, esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage, risk factorsEzofagojejuninės jungties nesandarumo išsivystymo rizikos veiksniai po gastrektomijosĮvadasEzofagojejuninės jungties nesandarumas (EJJN) po gastrektomijos yra viena iš didžiausią grėsmę gyvybei keliančių komplikacijų. Mokslinių tyrimų duomenimis, EJJN dažnis svyruoja nuo 2 iki 11 %. Darbo tikslas – nustatyti rizikos veiksnius,darančius įtaką ezofagojejuninės jungties nesandarumo vystymuisi po gastrektomijos dėl skrandžio vėžio, ir prognozuoti jų įtaką EJJN išsivystymui.Ligoniai ir metodaiRetrospektyviai ištirta 175 pacientų medicininė dokumentacija. Tirtiems pacientams 2006–2010 metais atlikta gastrektomija dėl skrandžio vėžio. Analizuoti veiksniai: amžius, lytis, Amerikos anesteziologų asociacijos (ASA) funkcinė klasė, splenektomija, jungties susiuvimo būdas, operacijos trukmė, naviko stadija, operacijos metu pašalintų limfmazgių skaičius, limfmazgių su mestazėmis skaičius, rezekciniai kraštai. Ankstyvuoju pooperaciniu laikotarpiu vertinta leukocitų kiekis, C reaktyviojo baltymo (CRB) koncentracija kraujyje, pooperacinė temperatūra, sekrecija pro drenus.RezultataiTirtų pacientų amžiaus vidurkis 63,2±11,5 metų. Vyrų 50,6 %, moterų 49,4 %. EJJN dažnis 6,3 %. Turėjusių EJJN pacientų mirtingumas siekė 9 %. Nustatyti rizikos veiksniai, statistiškai patikimai susiję su EJJN išsivystymu. Jų reikšmės patikslintosrandant ROC kreivės lūžio taškus: 4 parų vidutinė temperatūra 37,15oC (p=0,018), maksimalios leukocitų (11,7x109/l, p=0,031) ir C reaktyviojo baltymo reikšmės (159,95 mg/l, p=0,001), operacijos trukmė 247,5 min (p=0,009). Tačiau binarinė logistinė regresija parodė, kad šie kriterijai negali būti statistiškai patikimi prognoziniai EJJN vystymosi veiksniai.IšvadosEzofagojejuninės jungties nesandarumo dažnis po gastrektomijos dėl skrandžio vėžio yra 6,3%, šią komplikaciją turėjusių pacientų mirštamumas – 9%. Savo tyrime neradome prognostiškai reikšmingų rizikos veiksnių.Reikšminiai žodžiai: gastrektomija, ezofagojejuninės jungties nesandarumas, rizikos veiksnia

Impact of postoperative complications on clinical outcomes after gastrectomy for cancer:multicentre study

Background: To reduce the clinical and economic burden of complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, specific complications should be targeted to effectively allocate healthcare resources for quality improvement and preventive measures. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of complications on clinical outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective multicentre study of patients who underwent (sub)total gastrectomy for gastric or junctional adenocarcinoma at 43 centres in 16 countries between 2017 and 2021. Outcomes were escalation of care, reoperation, prolonged hospital stay (greater than the 75th percentile), readmission, and 30-day mortality. Adjusted relative risks and population attributable fractions were estimated for specific complication-outcome pairs. The population attributable fraction represents the percentage reduction in the frequency of an adverse outcome if a complication could be completely prevented in the population. Results: In total, 7829 patients were included. Postoperative complications occurred in 1884 patients (24.1%). The most frequent complications were pulmonary complications (436 patients (5.6%)), anastomotic leakage (363 patients (4.6%)), and abdominal collection (301 patients (3.8%)). Anastomotic leakage, cardiac complications, and pulmonary complications had the greatest impact on 30-day mortality (population attributable fraction 26.6% (95% c.i. 14.5% to 38.6%), 18.7% (95% c.i. 9.4% to 28.0%), and 15.6% (95% c.i. 12.0% to 30.0%) respectively). Anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications had the greatest impact on escalation of care (population attributable fraction 26.3% (95% c.i. 20.6% to 32.0%) and 18.4% (95% c.i. 11.7% to 25.2%) respectively), whereas anastomotic leakage and intra-abdominal bleeding had the greatest impact on reoperation (population attributable fraction 31.6% (95% c.i. 26.4% to 36.9%) and 8.5% (95% c.i. 5.5% to 11.5%) respectively). Most of the studied complications contributed to a prolonged hospital stay, whereas the contribution of complications to readmission did not exceed 15.9%. Subgroup analysis showed regional variation in the impact of complications. Conclusion: Anastomotic leakage had the largest overall negative impact on clinical outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications would have the most impact on the burden of complications.</p

Mid-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastric Greater Curvature Plication versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Weight Loss, Gastrointestinal Symptoms, and Health-Related Quality of Life

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication (LGGCP) is considered to be less invasive, technically simpler, and less costly. Few studies have compared LGGCP to gastric bypass. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of LGGCP such as weight loss, gastrointestinal symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in comparison to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Materials and Methods: Between 2017 April and 2018 December, 112 patients were included in the study. Fifty patients had LGGCP, and sixty-two patients underwent LRYGB. Demographics, comorbidities, complications, percentage of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL), gastrointestinal symptoms (GSRS questionnaire), and HRQoL (EQ-5D-3L questionnaire) were analysed. Gastrointestinal symptoms and HRQoL data are presented as the mean and median with the interquartile range (25th–75th percentile). Follow-up at 1 year and 3 year was performed. Results: The follow-up rate was 96.4% and 92.9%, 1 year and 3 year after surgery, respectively. Mean (SD) %EBMIL 1 year after surgery was 59.05 (25.34) in the LGGCP group and 82.40 (19.03) in the LRYGB group (p &lt; 0.001) and 3 year after was 41.44 (26.74) and 75.59 (19.14), respectively (p &lt; 0.001). The scores of all gastrointestinal symptoms measured by the GSRS questionnaire significantly decreased 3 year after both procedures, except reflux after LGGCP. Patients 3 year after LGGCP had a significantly lower abdominal pain score as compared to patients after LRYGB (1.01; 1.0 (1.0–1.0) and 1.20; 1.0 (1.0–1.33), respectively (p &lt; 0.001); however, LGGCP resulted in significantly more GERD symptoms (1.79; 1.25 (1.0–2.5) and 1.18; 1.0 (1.0–1.0), respectively (p &lt; 0.001)). Three years after surgery, the quality of life was significantly lower in the LGGCP group (0.762; 0.779 (0.690–0.794) and 0.898; 1.000 (0.783–1.000), respectively (p &lt; 0.001)). Conclusions: Three years after surgery, LGGCP patients lost significantly less weight, had less abdominal pain and more reflux symptoms, and a lower quality of life as compared to LRYGB patients.</jats:p

Mid-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastric Greater Curvature Plication versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Weight Loss, Gastrointestinal Symptoms, and Health-Related Quality of Life

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication (LGGCP) is considered to be less invasive, technically simpler, and less costly. Few studies have compared LGGCP to gastric bypass. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of LGGCP such as weight loss, gastrointestinal symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in comparison to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Materials and Methods: Between 2017 April and 2018 December, 112 patients were included in the study. Fifty patients had LGGCP, and sixty-two patients underwent LRYGB. Demographics, comorbidities, complications, percentage of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL), gastrointestinal symptoms (GSRS questionnaire), and HRQoL (EQ-5D-3L questionnaire) were analysed. Gastrointestinal symptoms and HRQoL data are presented as the mean and median with the interquartile range (25th&ndash;75th percentile). Follow-up at 1 year and 3 year was performed. Results: The follow-up rate was 96.4% and 92.9%, 1 year and 3 year after surgery, respectively. Mean (SD) %EBMIL 1 year after surgery was 59.05 (25.34) in the LGGCP group and 82.40 (19.03) in the LRYGB group (p &lt; 0.001) and 3 year after was 41.44 (26.74) and 75.59 (19.14), respectively (p &lt; 0.001). The scores of all gastrointestinal symptoms measured by the GSRS questionnaire significantly decreased 3 year after both procedures, except reflux after LGGCP. Patients 3 year after LGGCP had a significantly lower abdominal pain score as compared to patients after LRYGB (1.01; 1.0 (1.0&ndash;1.0) and 1.20; 1.0 (1.0&ndash;1.33), respectively (p &lt; 0.001); however, LGGCP resulted in significantly more GERD symptoms (1.79; 1.25 (1.0&ndash;2.5) and 1.18; 1.0 (1.0&ndash;1.0), respectively (p &lt; 0.001)). Three years after surgery, the quality of life was significantly lower in the LGGCP group (0.762; 0.779 (0.690&ndash;0.794) and 0.898; 1.000 (0.783&ndash;1.000), respectively (p &lt; 0.001)). Conclusions: Three years after surgery, LGGCP patients lost significantly less weight, had less abdominal pain and more reflux symptoms, and a lower quality of life as compared to LRYGB patients

Gastric greater curvature plication combined with Nissen fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity

Background and aim: Established anti-reflux procedures such as fundoplications are less efficient in obese patients. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical effectiveness of the fundoplication combined with gastric greater curvature plication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in obese patients. Materials and methods: During the period from June 2010 to September 2014, patients operated for GERD with BMI from 30 to 39.9 kg/m2 were included into the prospective study. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF, n = 58) was performed until February 2013 and later laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication was combined with gastric greater curvature plication (LNFGP, n = 56). The groups were compared according to the control of GERD and weight loss. Results: In LNF group there were significantly more males, patients had lower BMI and longer duration of GERD symptoms. Duration of surgery was significantly longer in LNFGP group, 96.5 (17.3) min vs. 59.8 (16.1) min (P < 0.0001). Postoperative morbidity was similar, 3.6% and 3.4% in LNFGP and LNF groups, respectively (P = 0.9539). The average percentage of excess BMI loss after 12 months was 45.3 (5.8) in LNFGP group as compared to 18.4 (4.6) in LNF group (P < 0.0001). Significantly more patients experienced remission or improvement of type 2 diabetes mellitus (P = 0.03) and hypercholesterolemia (P = 0.0001) in LNFGP group. No significant differences between the groups in postoperative DeMeester score, GERD-HRQL mean score, overall satisfaction and healing of esophagitis were observed

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Weight Loss, Eating Behaviour and Quality of Life after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background and Objectives: The global pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), declared on 11 March 2020, had an extensive impact on bariatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term weight loss outcomes, changes in eating behaviour, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients who had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This cohort study included 72 patients (Group S) who underwent RYGB surgery in the Surgery Department of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences during the COVID-19 pandemic in the years 2020-2022. Data for the control group (Group C) of 87 patients (operated on in 2010-2012) were collected from a prospective study. The data referred to the period before and a year after the RYGB. The information about patients' weight changes, hunger, satiety, fullness sensations, appetite, diet, and eating patterns was queried. Eating behaviour and HRQoL evaluation were conducted by the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R18) and the medical outcomes study Short-Form-36 (SF-36), respectively. Results: One year after the surgery, % excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) was 77.88 (26.33) in Group S, 76.21 (19.98) in Group C, p = 0.663. Patients in Group S tended more to choose snacks between main meals: 79.2% versus 28.7%, p < 0.0001. Cognitive restraint significantly increased in Group S from 45.93 (13.37) up to 54.48 (13.76), p = 0.001; additionally, significantly worse overall health status was found in Group S compared to Group C, 53.27 (24.61) versus 70.11 (31.63), p < 0.0001. Mental HRQoL (50.76 versus 60.52 score, p < 0.0001) and social functioning (44.79 versus 57.90, p < 0.0001) were worse in Group S. Conclusions: In this study, the COVID-19 pandemic had no impact on short-term weight loss after RYGB. However, one year after, RYGB patients tended to snack more, and mental HRQoL and social functioning were worse in the study group