147 research outputs found
Predicting trophic relations in ecological networks: a test of the Allometric Diet Breadth Model
Few of food web theory hypotheses/predictions can be readily tested using
empirical data. An exception is represented by simple probabilistic models for
food web structure, for which the likelihood has been derived. Here I test the
performance of a more complex model for food web structure that is grounded in
the allometric scaling of interactions with body size and the theory of optimal
foraging (Allometric Diet Breadth Model - ADBM). This deterministic model has
been evaluated measuring the fraction of trophic relations correctly predicted.
I contrast this value with that produced by simpler models based on body sizes
and find that the data does not favor the more complex model: the information
on allometric scaling and optimal foraging does not significantly increase the
fit to the data. Also, I take a different approach and compute the p-value for
the fraction of trophic interactions correctly predicted by ADBM with respect
to three probabilistic null models. I find that the ADBM is clearly better at
predicting links than random graphs, but other models can do even better.
Although optimal foraging and allometric scaling could improve our
understanding of food webs, the models need to be ameliorated to find support
in the data.Comment: 28 pages, 3 figures, 4 table
Reactivity and stability of large ecosystems
The study of local stability has a long tradition in community ecology. Stability describes whether an ecological system will eventually return to its original steady state after being perturbed. More recently, the study of the transient dynamics of ecological systems has been recognized as crucial, given that continuously disturbed systems might never reach a steady state, and thus the instantaneous response to perturbations could largely determine species persistence. A stable equilibrium can be nonreactive -- all perturbations decay immediately, or reactive -- some perturbations are initially amplified before decaying. Here we derive analytical criteria for the reactivity of large ecological systems in which species interact at random. We find that in large ecological systems both stability and reactivity are governed by the same quantities: number of species, means of the intra- and inter-specific interaction strengths, variance of inter-specific interactions, and the correlation of pairwise interactions. We identify two phase transitions, one from nonreactivity to reactivity and one from stability to instability. As reactivity is an intermediate state between nonreactivity and instability, it could be used to develop an early-warning signal for systems approaching instability
Recommended from our members
And, not or: Quality, quantity in scientific publishing
Scientists often perceive a trade-off between quantity and quality in scientific publishing: finite amounts of time and effort can be spent to produce few high-quality papers or subdivided to produce many papers of lower quality. Despite this perception, previous studies have indicated the opposite relationship, in which productivity (publishing more papers) is associated with increased paper quality (usually measured by citation accumulation). We examine this question in a novel way, comparing members of the National Academy of Sciences with themselves across years, and using a much larger dataset than previously analyzed. We find that a member’s most highly cited paper in a given year has more citations in more productive years than in in less productive years. Their lowest cited paper each year, on the other hand, has fewer citations in more productive years. To disentangle the effect of the underlying distributions of citations and productivities, we repeat the analysis for hypothetical publication records generated by scrambling each author’s citation counts among their publications. Surprisingly, these artificial histories re-create the above trends almost exactly. Put another way, the observed positive relationship between quantity and quality can be interpreted as a consequence of randomly drawing citation counts for each publication: more productive years yield higher-cited papers because they have more chances to draw a large value. This suggests that citation counts, and the rewards that have come to be associated with them, may be more stochastic than previously appreciated
- …