Mass spectrometry analysis of adipose-derived stem cells reveals a significant effect of hypoxia on pathways regulating extracellular matrix

Over-represented biological processes by gene ontology analysis of proteins identified in the secretome fraction. (DOCX 63 kb

Effect of differentiating exercise guidance based on a patient's level of low back pain in primary care:a mixed-methods systematic review protocol

IntroductionLow back pain (LBP) is one of the health conditions that lead to the most disability worldwide. Guidelines aimed at management of LBP recommend non-invasive and non-pharmacological management, including patient education, advice to stay active and exercise therapy; however, the guidelines offer no recommendation as to the allowable level of pain during exercise or how specific levels of pain should be reflected in the stage and progression of exercises or activities. The purpose of this review is to study the effect of differentiation of exercise guidance based on the level of LBP in patients in primary care.Methods and analysisA systematic search will be performed on PubMed, EMBASE, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDRO), Cochrane and PROSPERO from their inception until September 2017. Published peer-reviewed human experimental and observational studies with quantitative or qualitative designs will be included. Two independent reviewers will identify papers by reviewing titles and abstracts. Papers passing the initial selection will be appraised by two reviewers, based on their full texts. Furthermore, the reference lists of included studies will be snowballed for identification of other relevant studies. Data will be extracted using a standard extraction sheet by two independent reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion and consensus with a third reviewer. The methodological quality of studies will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation risk of bias tool, or the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Results will be reported narratively. Search histories will be documented on EndNote X8 (Clarivate Analytics).Ethics and disseminationEthical approval for this review was not required as primary data will not be collected. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed international journal and conference presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017074880.</jats:sec

Complete Spontaneous Regression of Squamous-Cell Lung Cancer:A Case Report

Spontaneous regression of cancer is an extremely rare phenomenon, and it has been described in only a few cases of pulmonary cancer. We report a case of complete spontaneous regression of squamous-cell lung cancer (SCLC) following a core needle biopsy in a 67-year-old female patient with two previous lung cancers and concomitant follicular lymphoma. The patient was diagnosed with SCLC after 4 core needle biopsies from a nodule in the left upper lobe and at the same time suspected of having follicular lymphoma. Treatment for the lung cancer was delayed by approximately 8 weeks because the diagnosis of lymphoma was both challenging and time-consuming. A computed tomography scan was performed in relation to the scheduled treatment for SCLC, showing that the pulmonary nodule had disappeared completely. Most other cases of spontaneous regression of lung cancer hint at the involvement of immunological factors, and this case possibly involves a combination of mechanical and local immunological factors. Genetic and immunological analysis of patients showing spontaneous regression of cancers could provide valuable information. </p

The effect of six-week regular stretching exercises on regional and distant pain sensitivity: an experimental longitudinal study on healthy adults

BACKGROUND: Stretching exercises are widely used for pain relief and show positive effects on musculoskeletal, nociplastic and neuropathic pain; the magnitude of altered pain sensitivity responses following regular stretching is currently unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of six weeks of regular stretching exercise on regional and widespread pain sensitivity and range of motion and the effect of stretching cessation on regional and widespread pain sensitivity and range of motion.METHODS: An experimental single-blind longitudinal repeated measures study. Twenty-six healthy adults were recruited. Regional and distant pressure pain thresholds and passive knee extension range of motion were measured at three points: before (baseline) and after six weeks (post-stretch) of daily bilateral hamstring stretching exercises and following four weeks of cessation (post-cessation) from stretching exercises.RESULTS: Participants had a mean ± standard deviation (range) age of 23.8 ± 2.1 (21-30) years. There was a 36.7% increase in regional (p = 0.003), an 18.7% increase in distant pressure pain thresholds (p = 0.042) and a 3.6% increase in range of motion (p = 0.002) between baseline and post-stretch measures. No statistically significant differences were found for regional (p = 1.000) or distant pressure pain thresholds (p = 1.000), or range of motion (p = 1.000) between post-stretch and post-cessation. A 41.2% increase in distant pressure pain thresholds (p = 0.001), a 15.4% increase in regional pressure pain thresholds from baseline to post-cessation (p = 0.127) and a 3.6% increase in passive knee extension range of motion (p = 0.005) were found from baseline to post-cessation.CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of regular stretching exercises significantly decreased regional and widespread pain sensitivity. Moreover, the results showed that the hypoalgesic effect of stretching on regional and widespread pain sensitivity persisted following four weeks of cessation. The results further support the rationale of adding stretching exercises to rehabilitation efforts for patients experiencing nociceptive, nociplastic, and neuropathic pain. However, further research is needed to investigate how the long-term effects of stretching exercises compare with no treatment in clinical populations.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered June 1st, 2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov (Trial registration number NCT04919681).</p