6 research outputs found
"What do you expect from physiotherapy?": a detailed analysis of goal setting in physiotherapy
Purpose: Health care practice guidelines require physiotherapists to include patients in goal-setting. However, not much is known about how this process is accomplished in practice. The purpose of this study is to analyse patient–physiotherapist consultations and to identify how physiotherapists enquire about goals and how patients respond to these enquiries. Method: 37 consenting patients and their physiotherapist from outpatient physiotherapy practice settings were videotaped. Conversation analysis was used to transcribe and analyse the data. Results: In 11 cases, physiotherapists enquire explicitly about goals. Patients’ responses indicate that problems can arise when therapists’ questions treat it as expected that the patient has a goal already in mind, and has sufficient understanding about “physiotherapy-relevant” goals. Patients’ difficulties with stating a goal are related to patients’ knowledge to propose a goal and whether they treat consultations as one in which it is appropriate to claim knowledge about goals. Conclusions: Goal-setting is not a straightforward process. Practices that entail asking patients to state their goals neither take into consideration the fact that patients may not know what an achievable goal is nor do they consider so-called social reasons for patients not to make claims to their physiotherapist about what the goals should be
Keeping the conversation going: How progressivity is prioritised in co-remembering talk between couples impacted by dementia
This article explores how partners keep the conversation going with people living with dementia (PLWD) when speaking about shared memories. Remembering is important for PLWD and their families. Indeed, memory loss is often equated with identity loss. In conversation, references to shared past events (co-rememberings) can occasion interactional trouble if memories cannot be mutually recalled. This article analyses partners’ interactional practices that enable progressivity in conversations about shared memories with a PLWD. In previous research, both informal and formal carers have reported that they can find interacting with PLWD difficult. Identifying practices used by partners is one way to begin addressing those difficulties. Analytical findings are based on over 26 hours of video data from domestic settings where partners have recorded their interactions with their spouse/close friend who is living with dementia. The focus is on 14 sequences of conversation about shared memories. We show how particular practices (candidate answers, tag questions and single-party memory of a shared event) structure the interaction to facilitate conversational progression. When partners facilitate conversational progressivity, PLWD are less likely to experience stalls in conversation. Our findings suggest the actual recall of memory is less relevant than the sense of shared connection resulting from the conversational activity of co-remembering, aiding maintenance of individual and shared identities. These findings have relevance for wider care settings. </p
Timing of when each outcome measure was taken.
<p>Timing of when each outcome measure was taken.</p
Blind ratings of communication behaviours during closings of evaluation simulations.
<p>Blind ratings of communication behaviours during closings of evaluation simulations.</p
Blind ratings of communication behaviours during requests in evaluation simulation.
<p>Blind ratings of communication behaviours during requests in evaluation simulation.</p