34 research outputs found

    Interspecies discrimination of A. fumigatus and siblings A. lentulus and A. felis of the Aspergillus section Fumigati using the AsperGeniusĀ® assay

    Get PDF
    The AsperGeniusĀ® assay detects several Aspergillus species and the A. fumigatus Cyp51A mutations TR34/L98H/T289A/Y121F that are associated with azole resistance. We evaluated its contribution in identifying A. lentulus and A. felis, 2 rare but intrinsically azole-resistant sibling species within the Aspergillus section Fumigati. Identification of these species with conventional culture techniques is difficult and time-consuming. The assay was tested on (i) 2 A. lentulus and A. felis strains obtained from biopsy proven invasive aspergillosis and (ii) control A. fumigatus (n=3), A. lentulus (n=6) and A. felis species complex (n=12) strains. The AsperGeniusĀ® resistance PCR did not detect the TR34 target in A. lentulus and A. felis in contrast to A. fumigatus. Melting peaks for L98H and Y121F markers differed and those of the Y121F marker were particularly suitable to discriminate the 3 species. In conclusion, the assay can be used to rapidly discriminate A. fumigatus, A. lentulus and A. felis.

    Effect of Recombinant Murine Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor with or without Fluoroquinolone Therapy on Mixed-Infection Abscesses in Mice

    Get PDF
    The aim of the study was to determine if immunomodulation of host defense with recombinant murine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) improves the efficacy of trovafloxacin or moxifloxacin in abscesses containing Bacillus fragilis ATCC 23745 and different Escherichia coli strains varying in virulence. Treatment of mice inoculated with 10(7) CFU B. fragilis and 10(5) CFU low-virulence E. coli with either trovafloxacin (150 mg/kg/day every 24 hours, days 3 to 7) or moxifloxacin (96 mg/kg/day every 12 hours, days 3 to 7), significantly reduced the number of B. fragilis to 6.9 Ā± 0.35 and 5.8 Ā± 0.10 and that of E. coli to 4.9 Ā± 0.09 and 4.2 Ā± 0.07 log CFU/abscess for trovafloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively, compared to controls (B. fragilis 8.7 and E. coli 7.4 log CFU/abscess) on day 8. Also, moxifloxacin was more potent than trovafloxacin. Addition of G-CSF prophylaxis (1 Ī¼g once on day āˆ’1) or therapy (1 Ī¼g/day on days 3 to 7) to fluoroquinolone treatment did not improve the efficacy of fluoroquinolone therapy alone. The effect of moxifloxacin with or without G-CSF prophylaxis on abscesses with a virulent hemolytic E. coli strain was also studied. In moxifloxacin-treated mice, 75% survived infection compared to 10% of controls. Combining moxifloxacin with G-CSF prophylaxis significantly decreased survival (30%) compared to moxifloxacin alone. In addition, G-CSF prophylaxis resulted in a threefold (E. coli) to 100-fold (B. fragilis) increased outgrowth in the abscesses of surviving mice. In conclusion, the addition of G-CSF to a fluoroquinolone is not advisable since, depending on the virulence of the E. coli strains, this might detrimentally influence the outcome of therapy

    Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Abscesses Caused by Candida albicans with Antifungal Agents and Recombinant Murine Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

    No full text
    The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of immunomodulation of host defense with recombinant murine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rmG-CSF) on intra-abdominal abscesses caused by Candida albicans. Mice received prophylaxis or therapy with 1 Ī¼g of rmG-CSF/day in the presence or absence of antifungal treatment consisting of amphotericin B (0.75 mg/kg of body weight/day) or fluconazole (50 mg/kg/day). The number of Candida CFU in abscesses was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in mice receiving rmG-CSF prophylaxis (day āˆ’1 or day āˆ’1 through 2) compared with controls on day 8 of infection. Administration of rmG-CSF therapy alone (for 5 days starting on day 4 of infection) had no influence on the number of Candida CFU in abscesses. Amphotericin B treatment was significantly more effective than fluconazole treatment (3.41 log CFU/abscesses; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.17 log CFU/abscesses; 3.65 versus 3.90 log CFU/abscesses; 95% CI, 3.66 log CFU/abscesses, 4.16 log CFU/abscesses; P < 0.05). Therapeutic administration of rmG-CSF in conjunction with an antifungal agent showed a tendency towards a further reduction of Candida CFU in abscesses than antifungal treatment only. In conclusion, in this experimental model of intra-abdominal Candida abscesses, rmG-CSF administration did not have a detrimental influence on the course of infection. Amphotericin B treatment was most effective, and additional rmG-CSF therapy did not antagonize the effect of antifungal treatment. In contrast, addition of rmG-CSF therapy to antifungal treatment might further enhance the beneficial effect of the antifungal agent
    corecore