Impact of Primary Breast Surgery on Overall Survival of Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Breast surgery; Metastatic; Overall survivalCirurgia de mama; Metastàtic; Supervivència generalCirugía de mama; Metastásico; Supervivencia generalBackground Breast surgery in cases of de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is associated with improved outcomes in retrospective studies, although the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are conflicting. We aimed to investigate whether surgery in this context prolongs patient survival. Methods We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify RCTs comparing surgery of primary breast cancer to no surgery in patients with de novo MBC. Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline (OVID), and Web of Science were searched with latest update in July 2023, while conference proceedings were manually searched. Data concerning patient and tumor characteristics, as well as outcomes, were extracted. A meta-analysis with random effects models was performed considering heterogeneity between trials. Results Overall, 3255 entries were identified and 5 RCTs fulfilled all inclusion criteria, which had enrolled 1381 patients. The overall estimation in the intention-to-treat population showed no benefit for patients who had surgical excision of the primary breast tumor (HR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.14). No subgroups in terms of receptor status or patterns of metastasis seemed to benefit from surgery, except for younger/premenopausal patients (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58-0.94). Breast surgery was associated with improved local progression-free survival (HR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.19-0.74). Conclusion Surgery of the primary tumor in patients with de novo MBC does not prolong survival, except possibly in younger/premenopausal patients. Breast surgery should be offered within the context of well-designed clinical trials examining the issue

Machine learning-based spatial characterization of tumor-immune microenvironment in the EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 early breast cancer trial

Machine learning; Tumor-immune microenvironment; Breast cancerAprendizaje automático; Microambiente inmunitario tumoral; Cáncer de mamaAprenentatge automàtic; Microambient immunitari tumoral; Càncer de mamaBreast cancer (BC) represents a heterogeneous ecosystem and elucidation of tumor microenvironment components remains essential. Our study aimed to depict the composition and prognostic correlates of immune infiltrate in early BC, at a multiplex and spatial resolution. Pretreatment tumor biopsies from patients enrolled in the EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 randomized phase III neoadjuvant trial (NCT00017095) were used; the CNN11 classifier for H&E-based digital TILs (dTILs) quantification and multiplex immunofluorescence were applied, coupled with machine learning (ML)-based spatial features. dTILs were higher in the triple-negative (TN) subtype, and associated with pathological complete response (pCR) in the whole cohort. Total CD4+ and intra-tumoral CD8+ T-cells expression was associated with pCR. Higher immune-tumor cell colocalization was observed in TN tumors of patients achieving pCR. Immune cell subsets were enriched in TP53-mutated tumors. Our results indicate the feasibility of ML-based algorithms for immune infiltrate characterization and the prognostic implications of its abundance and tumor-host interactions.Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute

Randomised trial of trastuzumab deruxtecan and biology-driven selection of neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer: a study protocol of ARIADNE

Breast tumours; Drug therapyTumores de mama; Tratamiento farmacológicoTumors de mama; Teràpia farmacològicaIntroduction: Neoadjuvant therapy is the standard of care for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). Studies on first-generation antibody-drug conjugates, such as trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), showed equal or slightly lower efficacy than chemotherapy combined with dual HER2 blockade. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a next-generation conjugate approved for the treatment of metastatic HER2-positive and HER2-low BC, with greatly improved efficacy compared to T-DM1. Methods and analysis: ARIADNE is an academic, international, open-label, randomised, comparative phase IIB trial. A total of 370 patients with non-metastatic HER2-positive BC and an indication for neoadjuvant therapy will be included and randomised 1:1 to receive either (1) docetaxel (or paclitaxel), carboplatin, trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) for three cycles or (2) T-DXd for three cycles. Further treatment is based on the intrinsic molecular subtype determined by the Prosigna assay: patients with HER2-enriched disease (estimated 60%) continue the same treatment for three more cycles. Patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive and luminal (estimated 30%) disease receive H and P for three cycles, combined with letrozole and ribociclib for two cycles. Patients with ER-negative and luminal, basal-like or normal-like disease (estimated 10%) either continue the same treatment for three more cycles in the case of a radiologic complete response, or, in the case of no complete response, they receive four cycles of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint of ARIADNE is locally assessed rate of pathologic complete response in the molecularly HER2-enriched population, defined as ypT0/Tis, ypN0, as determined by a pathologist blinded to treatment assignment (intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis). Key secondary endpoints include time-to-event endpoints (event-free, recurrence-free, distant recurrence-free and overall survival), safety, health-related quality of life and translational studies. Ethics and dissemination: The study has been approved by the Swedish Medical Products Agency (Läkemedelsverket), the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Etikprövningsmyndigheten) and the Norwegian Ethics Committee for Clinical Trials on Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, as well as by the review boards at all participating centres. Applications for ethical approval in Belgium, the Netherlands and Italy are ongoing. We intend to publish the results of the study in a scientific journal. The study results will be submitted to the European Union (EU) database within 1 year after the end of the clinical trial (CT). Trial registration number: EU CT registration number: 2022-501504-95-00; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05900206.This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet), grant number 2020-00636; the Swedish Cancer Society (Cancerfonden), grant number 24 3705 S 02 H and by AstraZeneca, Novartis and Veracyte

Prolonged Complete Response in a Patient with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma after FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy and Maintenance with FOLFIRI

Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma confers a poor prognosis. Even with recent advances in the treatment of this disease with the introduction of two modestly effective chemotherapy regimens, complete responses are still very rare. Moreover, there are no published data on how to further manage the patients who achieve a sustained remission following treatment. Herein, we report the case of a patient with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who achieved a complete response lasting for more than three years after receiving induction chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX followed by maintenance with FOLFIRI

Characterization of HER2-low breast cancer in young women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenetic variants: Results of a large international retrospective cohort study

Breast cancer (BC) in women aged ≤40 years carrying germline pathogenetic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 genes is infrequent but often associated with aggressive features. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing BC has recently emerged as a novel therapeutic target but has not been characterized in this rare patient subset. Methods Women aged ≤40 years with newly diagnosed early-stage HER2-negative BC (HER2-0 and HER2-low) and germline BRCA1/2 PVs from 78 health care centers worldwide were retrospectively included. Chi-square test and Student t-test were used to describe variable distribution between HER2-0 and HER2-low. Associations with HER2-low status were assessed with logistic regression. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. Statistical significance was considered for p ≤ .05. Results Of 3547 included patients, 32.3% had HER2-low BC, representing 46.3% of hormone receptor–positive and 21.3% of triple-negative (TN) tumors. HER2-low vs. HER2-0 BC were more often of grade 1/2 (p < .001), hormone receptor–positive (p < .001), and node-positive (p = .003). BRCA2 PVs were more often associated with HER2-low than BRCA1 PVs (p < .001). HER2-low versus HER2-0 showed better DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76–0.97) in the overall population and more favorable DFS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64–0.95) and overall survival (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46–0.93) in the TN subgroup. Luminal A–like tumors in HER2-low (p = .014) and TN and luminal A-like in HER2-0 (p = .019) showed the worst DFS. Conclusions In young patients with HER2-negative BC and germline BRCA1/2 PVs, HER2-low disease was less frequent than expected and more frequently linked to BRCA2 PVs and associated with luminal-like disease. HER2-low status was associated with a modestly improved prognosis. Breast cancer (BC) in women aged ≤40 years carrying germline pathogenetic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 genes is infrequent but often associated with aggressive features. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing BC has recently emerged as a novel therapeutic target but has not been characterized in this rare patient subset. Methods Women aged ≤40 years with newly diagnosed early-stage HER2-negative BC (HER2-0 and HER2-low) and germline BRCA1/2 PVs from 78 health care centers worldwide were retrospectively included. Chi-square test and Student t-test were used to describe variable distribution between HER2-0 and HER2-low. Associations with HER2-low status were assessed with logistic regression. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. Statistical significance was considered for p ≤ .05. Results Of 3547 included patients, 32.3% had HER2-low BC, representing 46.3% of hormone receptor–positive and 21.3% of triple-negative (TN) tumors. HER2-low vs. HER2-0 BC were more often of grade 1/2 (p < .001), hormone receptor–positive (p < .001), and node-positive (p = .003). BRCA2 PVs were more often associated with HER2-low than BRCA1 PVs (p < .001). HER2-low versus HER2-0 showed better DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76–0.97) in the overall population and more favorable DFS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64–0.95) and overall survival (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46–0.93) in the TN subgroup. Luminal A–like tumors in HER2-low (p = .014) and TN and luminal A-like in HER2-0 (p = .019) showed the worst DFS. Conclusions In young patients with HER2-negative BC and germline BRCA1/2 PVs, HER2-low disease was less frequent than expected and more frequently linked to BRCA2 PVs and associated with luminal-like disease. HER2-low status was associated with a modestly improved prognosis

Characterization of HER2-low breast cancer in young women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenetic variants: Results of a large international retrospective cohort study

Background: Breast cancer (BC) in women aged ≤40 years carrying germline pathogenetic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 genes is infrequent but often associated with aggressive features. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing BC has recently emerged as a novel therapeutic target but has not been characterized in this rare patient subset. Methods: Women aged ≤40 years with newly diagnosed early-stage HER2-negative BC (HER2-0 and HER2-low) and germline BRCA1/2 PVs from 78 health care centers worldwide were retrospectively included. Chi-square test and Student t-test were used to describe variable distribution between HER2-0 and HER2-low. Associations with HER2-low status were assessed with logistic regression. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. Statistical significance was considered for p ≤.05. Results: Of 3547 included patients, 32.3% had HER2-low BC, representing 46.3% of hormone receptor–positive and 21.3% of triple-negative (TN) tumors. HER2-low vs. HER2-0 BC were more often of grade 1/2 (p <.001), hormone receptor–positive (p <.001), and node-positive (p =.003). BRCA2 PVs were more often associated with HER2-low than BRCA1 PVs (p <.001). HER2-low versus HER2-0 showed better DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76–0.97) in the overall population and more favorable DFS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64–0.95) and overall survival (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46–0.93) in the TN subgroup. Luminal A–like tumors in HER2-low (p =.014) and TN and luminal A-like in HER2-0 (p =.019) showed the worst DFS. Conclusions: In young patients with HER2-negative BC and germline BRCA1/2 PVs, HER2-low disease was less frequent than expected and more frequently linked to BRCA2 PVs and associated with luminal-like disease. HER2-low status was associated with a modestly improved prognosis