3 research outputs found
Physical Activity for Bone Health: How Much and/or How Hard?
Purpose:High-impact physical activity is associated with bone health, but higher volumes of lower intensity activity may also be important. The aims of this study were to: 1) investigate the relative importance of volume and intensity of physical activity accumulated during late adolescence for bone health at age 23; and 2) illustrate interpretation of the results.Methods:This is a secondary analysis of data from the Iowa Bone Development Study, a longitudinal study of bone health from childhood through to young adulthood. The volume (average acceleration) and intensity distribution (intensity gradient) of activity at ages 17, 19, 21 and 23 were calculated from raw acceleration ActiGraph data and averaged across ages. Hip areal bone mineral density (aBMD), total body bone mineral content (BMC), spine aBMD and hip structural geometry (DXA, Hologic QDR4500A) were assessed at age 23.Valid data, available for 220 participants (124 females),were analysed with multiple regression. To elucidate significant effects, we predicted bone outcomes when activity volume and intensity were high (+1SD), medium (mean),and low (-1SD).Results:There were additive associations of volume and intensity with hip aBMD and total body BMC(low-intensity/low-volume cf. high-intensity/high-volume = ∆0.082g·cm-2and ∆169.8g, respectively). or males’ only spine aBMD intensity was associated independently of volume(low-intensity cf. high-intensity = ∆0.049g.cm-2). For hip structural geometry, volume was associated independently of intensity(low-volume cf. high-volume = ∆4.8-6.6%).Conclusion: The activity profile associated with optimal bone outcomes was high in intensity and volume. The variation in bone health across the activity volume and intensity distribution suggests intensity is key for aBMD and BMC, while high volumes of lower intensity activity may be beneficial for hip structural geometry.</p
Enhancing clinical and public health interpretation of accelerometer-assessed physical activity with age-referenced values based on UK Biobank data
No description supplie
Self-supervised learning of accelerometer data provides new insights for sleep and its association with mortality
Sleep is essential to life. Accurate measurement and classification of sleep/wake and sleep stages is important in clinical studies for sleep disorder diagnoses and in the interpretation of data from consumer devices for monitoring physical and mental well-being. Existing non-polysomnography sleep classification techniques mainly rely on heuristic methods developed in relatively small cohorts. Thus, we aimed to establish the accuracy of wrist-worn accelerometers for sleep stage classification and subsequently describe the association between sleep duration and efficiency (proportion of total time asleep when in bed) with mortality outcomes. We developed a self-supervised deep neural network for sleep stage classification using concurrent laboratory-based polysomnography and accelerometry. After exclusion, 1448 participant nights of data were used for training. The difference between polysomnography and the model classifications on the external validation was 34.7 min (95% limits of agreement (LoA): −37.8–107.2 min) for total sleep duration, 2.6 min for REM duration (95% LoA: −68.4–73.4 min) and 32.1 min (95% LoA: −54.4–118.5 min) for NREM duration. The sleep classifier was deployed in the UK Biobank with 100,000 participants to study the association of sleep duration and sleep efficiency with all-cause mortality. Among 66,214 UK Biobank participants, 1642 mortality events were observed. Short sleepers (<6 h) had a higher risk of mortality compared to participants with normal sleep duration of 6–7.9 h, regardless of whether they had low sleep efficiency (Hazard ratios (HRs): 1.58; 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.19–2.11) or high sleep efficiency (HRs: 1.45; 95% CIs: 1.16–1.81). Deep-learning-based sleep classification using accelerometers has a fair to moderate agreement with polysomnography. Our findings suggest that having short overnight sleep confers mortality risk irrespective of sleep continuity.</p