Long Stent Implantation on the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery at a Follow-Up of More Than Five Years

Background: Stent implantation represents the standard of care in coronary intervention. While a short stent implanted on a focal lesion located on the left anterior descending artery (LAD) seems a reasonable alternative to an internal mammary implant, the same for long stents is still debated. Methods: We reported the long-term data of 531 consecutive patients who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) with long stents in two highly specialized centres. The main inclusion criteria were the implantation of stents longer than 30 mm on the LAD and a minimum follow-up (FU) of five years. The primary endpoint was mortality, and the secondary endpoints were any myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel and lesion revascularization (TVR and TLR, respectively), and stent thrombosis (ST) observed as definite, probable, or possible. Results: In this selected population with characteristics of complex PCI (99.1%), the long-term follow-up (mean 92.18 ± 35.5 months) estimates of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and any myocardial infarction were 18.3%, 10.5%, and 9.3%, respectively. Both all-cause and cardiovascular deaths are significantly associated with three-vessel disease (HR 6.8; confidence of interval (CI) 95% 3.844–11.934; p &lt; 0.001, and HR 4.7; CI 95% 2.265–9.835; p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Target lesion (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) are associated with the presence of three-lesion disease on the LAD (HR 3.4; CI 95% 1.984–5.781; p &lt; 0.001; HR 3.9 CI 95% 2.323–6.442; p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Re-PCI for any cause occurred in 31.5% of patients and shows an increased risk for three-lesion stenting (HR 4.3; CI 95% 2.873–6.376; p &lt; 0.001) and the treatment of bifurcation with two stents (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.051–2.414; p = 0.028). Stent thrombosis rate at the 5-year FU was 4.4% (1.3% definite; 0.9% probable; 2.1% possible), including a 1.7% rate of very-late thrombosis. The stent length superior to 40 mm was not associated with poor outcomes (all-cause death p = 0.349; cardiovascular death p = 0.855; MI p = 0.691; re-PCI p = 0.234; TLR p = 0.805; TVR p = 0.087; ST p = 0.189). Conclusion: At an FU of longer than five years, patients treated with stents longer than 30 mm in their LAD showed acceptable procedural results but poor outcomes.</p

Long Stent Implantation on the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery at a Follow-Up of More Than Five Years

Background: Stent implantation represents the standard of care in coronary intervention. While a short stent implanted on a focal lesion located on the left anterior descending artery (LAD) seems a reasonable alternative to an internal mammary implant, the same for long stents is still debated. Methods: We reported the long-term data of 531 consecutive patients who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) with long stents in two highly specialized centres. The main inclusion criteria were the implantation of stents longer than 30 mm on the LAD and a minimum follow-up (FU) of five years. The primary endpoint was mortality, and the secondary endpoints were any myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel and lesion revascularization (TVR and TLR, respectively), and stent thrombosis (ST) observed as definite, probable, or possible. Results: In this selected population with characteristics of complex PCI (99.1%), the long-term follow-up (mean 92.18 ± 35.5 months) estimates of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and any myocardial infarction were 18.3%, 10.5%, and 9.3%, respectively. Both all-cause and cardiovascular deaths are significantly associated with three-vessel disease (HR 6.8; confidence of interval (CI) 95% 3.844–11.934; p &lt; 0.001, and HR 4.7; CI 95% 2.265–9.835; p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Target lesion (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) are associated with the presence of three-lesion disease on the LAD (HR 3.4; CI 95% 1.984–5.781; p &lt; 0.001; HR 3.9 CI 95% 2.323–6.442; p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Re-PCI for any cause occurred in 31.5% of patients and shows an increased risk for three-lesion stenting (HR 4.3; CI 95% 2.873–6.376; p &lt; 0.001) and the treatment of bifurcation with two stents (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.051–2.414; p = 0.028). Stent thrombosis rate at the 5-year FU was 4.4% (1.3% definite; 0.9% probable; 2.1% possible), including a 1.7% rate of very-late thrombosis. The stent length superior to 40 mm was not associated with poor outcomes (all-cause death p = 0.349; cardiovascular death p = 0.855; MI p = 0.691; re-PCI p = 0.234; TLR p = 0.805; TVR p = 0.087; ST p = 0.189). Conclusion: At an FU of longer than five years, patients treated with stents longer than 30 mm in their LAD showed acceptable procedural results but poor outcomes.</p

Procedural Performance of Ultrathin, Biodegradable Polymer-Coated Stents Versus Durable Polymer-Coated Stents Based on Intracoronary Imaging

OBJECTIVE: Thinner stent struts might lead to a higher risk of recoil and subsequently a smaller minimal stent area (MSA), which is known to be the strongest predictor of stent failure. We compared procedural performance between an ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) and a durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (DP-ZES) using intracoronary imaging.METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either BP-SES or DP-ZES in a pseudorandomized fashion between July 2018 and October 2019. In the present subanalysis, we included cases in which post-PCI imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed. The primary endpoint of the study was MSA. Secondary endpoints included percentage stent expansion and presence of residual edge disease, malapposition, tissue protrusion, submedial edge dissections, or edge hematoma.RESULTS: A total of 141 treated lesions (78 BP-SES and 63 DP-ZES) in 127 patients were analyzed. Median age was 69.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 57.3-75.6) and 74.0% of patients were male. All baseline and procedural characteristics were comparable between both groups. Median MSA was 5.80 mm² (IQR, 4.40-7.24) for BP-SES and 6.35 mm² (IQR, 4.76-8.31) for DP-ZES (P=.15). No significant differences in stent expansion, residual edge disease and presence of malapposition, tissue protrusion, submedial edge dissections, or edge hematomas were found. Stent diameter and stent length were found to be independent predictors of MSA.CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in MSA were found between lesions treated with BP-SES vs DP-ZES. BP-SES and DP-ZES were comparable in terms of procedural performance.</p

Procedural Performance of Ultrathin, Biodegradable Polymer-Coated Stents Versus Durable Polymer-Coated Stents Based on Intracoronary Imaging

OBJECTIVE: Thinner stent struts might lead to a higher risk of recoil and subsequently a smaller minimal stent area (MSA), which is known to be the strongest predictor of stent failure. We compared procedural performance between an ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) and a durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (DP-ZES) using intracoronary imaging.METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either BP-SES or DP-ZES in a pseudorandomized fashion between July 2018 and October 2019. In the present subanalysis, we included cases in which post-PCI imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed. The primary endpoint of the study was MSA. Secondary endpoints included percentage stent expansion and presence of residual edge disease, malapposition, tissue protrusion, submedial edge dissections, or edge hematoma.RESULTS: A total of 141 treated lesions (78 BP-SES and 63 DP-ZES) in 127 patients were analyzed. Median age was 69.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 57.3-75.6) and 74.0% of patients were male. All baseline and procedural characteristics were comparable between both groups. Median MSA was 5.80 mm² (IQR, 4.40-7.24) for BP-SES and 6.35 mm² (IQR, 4.76-8.31) for DP-ZES (P=.15). No significant differences in stent expansion, residual edge disease and presence of malapposition, tissue protrusion, submedial edge dissections, or edge hematomas were found. Stent diameter and stent length were found to be independent predictors of MSA.CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in MSA were found between lesions treated with BP-SES vs DP-ZES. BP-SES and DP-ZES were comparable in terms of procedural performance.</p

Renewable Heating and Cooling Solutions for Buildings and Industry

This workshop brought together a selection of H2020 EU-funded projects involving experts from the biomass, geothermal, solar thermal, and heat pump sectors to discuss a common strategy for increasing the use of renewable energy technologies for heating and cooling for buildings and industry