11 research outputs found

    Multiple Linear Regressions Modeling for the Association of BMI (kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and Lung Function.

    No full text
    <p><b>Model</b>: Lung Function = BMI + Age + Gender</p><p><b>Abbreviations</b>: BMI = Body Mass Index; SE = Standard Error.</p><p>Coefficients are expressed as change in percent predicted lung function per unit BMI (kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</p><p>*P value less than 0.001 were deemed significant, after the Bonferroni adjustment</p><p>Multiple Linear Regressions Modeling for the Association of BMI (kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and Lung Function.</p

    The linear regression between BMI and DlCO (top left), VC (top right), TLC (bottom left), and RV (bottom right).

    No full text
    <p>Linear regression between BMI and DLCO (P < .0001), VC (P = 0.895), TLC (P = 0.459) and RV (P = 0.301). The intervals represent the lower prediction limit (LPL) and the upper prediction limit (UPL) of the regression line. The vertical dash lines are the cut-points separating the BMI categories defined in the DLCO graph. The slopes of the linear regression for percentage of predicted values and BMI were -0.166 (DLCO), 0.005 (VC), -0.026 (TLC), and -0.016 (RV).</p

    Demographics and Pulmonary Function Results for the Different BMI Groups (Kg/m<sup>2</sup>).

    No full text
    <p>* Values are expressed as No. or mean percentage of predicted (SD), RV/TLC and FRC/TLC are expressed as absolute ratios. Comparisons between BMI groups for ERV, FRC, and DLCO are shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0140610#pone.0140610.s002" target="_blank">S1 Fig</a>.</p><p>¥For FRC/TLC and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC, P<0.05 compared to BMI groups 20–24.9 and 25–29.9kg/m<sup>2</sup></p><p>BMI = body mass index</p><p>Demographics and Pulmonary Function Results for the Different BMI Groups (Kg/m<sup>2</sup>).</p

    The polynomial regressions for FRC (left) and ERV (right).

    No full text
    <p>The r<sup>2</sup> values for FRC and ERV were 0.151 and 0.269, and the second order polynomial regression equations were as follows: FRC = 0.0143*(BMI)<sup>2</sup>–1.8448*(BMI) + 121.88 and ERV = 0.0742*(BMI)<sup>2</sup>–7.0384*(BMI) + 195.29 with p < 0.0001. The BMI classifications are the same as those in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0140610#pone.0140610.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1</a>.</p

    Age-standardized rates of mental disorder DALYs, by country and sex.

    No full text
    <p>Age-standardized rates of mental disorder DALYs, by country and sex.</p

    Change in DALYS/100,000 from 1990–2013, by income.

    No full text
    <p>Change in DALYS/100,000 from 1990–2013, by income.</p

    Rate of DALYs due to mental disorders in EMR and globally, by income level and gender.

    No full text
    <p>Rate of DALYs due to mental disorders in EMR and globally, by income level and gender.</p

    Rate of DALYs in EMR, by age and gender.

    No full text
    <p>Rate of DALYs in EMR, by age and gender.</p

    Proportion of DALYs explained by each mental disorder within the EMR.

    No full text
    <p>Proportion of DALYs explained by each mental disorder within the EMR.</p

    Change in DALY rates from 1990–2013, by gender.

    No full text
    <p>Change in DALY rates from 1990–2013, by gender.</p
    corecore