19 research outputs found
ΠΠ£Π’ΠΠ¦ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ SMARCB1 Π ΠΠΠ£Π₯ΠΠΠ―Π₯ Π ΠΠΠΠΠ§ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ¦ΠΠ
In the recent years, the full exome sequencing helped to reveal aΒ set of mutations in the genes that are not oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes by definition, but play an important role in carcinogenesis and encode proteins involved in chromatin remodeling. Among chromatin remodeling systems, which operate through the ATP-dependent mechanism, the complex SWI/ SNF attracts the great attention. The complex consists of the catalytic ATPase (SMARCA2/4), aΒ group of conservative core subunits (SMARCB1, SMARCC1/2), and variant subunits. Abnormalities in the genes coding for each of these components have been identified as driver mutations in various human tumors. The SMARCB1 gene is of interest for practical oncogenetics, with its typical genotype-phenotype correlations. Germinal inactivating mutations (frameshift insertions/deletions, full deletions of the gene, nonsense mutations) lead to development of rhabdoid tumors in the kidneys and the brain in children in their first years of life, or even in utero. These tumors are highly malignant (Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition SyndromeΒ 1Β β RTPS1). If aΒ mutation carrier survives his/hers four years of life without manifestation RTPS1 with aΒ missense mutation or has the mutation in the "hot spot" of the first or the last exon, then he/she will not develop rhabdoid tumors, but after 20 years of life, shwannomatosis may develop as multiple benign tumors of peripheral nerves. Finally, some point mutations in the exons 8β9 can result in Coffin-Siris syndrome characterized by mental retardation and developmental disorders, but no neoplasms. In this regard, rational referral of patients for direct DNA diagnostics of each of the described disease entities plays an important role, based on respective minimal criteria, as well as necessity of further development of NGS technologies (full genome and full exome sequencing) that are able to sequence not only individual exons, but all candidate genes of the disorders.Π ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΡΒ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΠΊΠ·ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΌΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²Β Π³Π΅Π½Π°Ρ
, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ-ΡΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π²Β ΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π΅ ΠΈΒ ΠΊΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡΡ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΈ, ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³ Ρ
ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ½Π°. Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π° Ρ
ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ½Π°, ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎ Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Ρ(ΠΠ’Π€)-Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ, Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ SWI/SNF. KΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ’Π€Π°Π·Ρ (SMARCA2/4), Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ (SMARCB1, SMARCC1/2) ΠΈΒ Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Β Π³Π΅Π½Π°Ρ
ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ-Π΄ΡΠ°ΠΉΠ²Π΅ΡΡ Π²Β ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ°. Π‘Β ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ Π³Π΅Π½ SMARCB1, Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Ρ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (ΠΈΠ½- ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ/Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎ ΡΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π³Π΅Π½Π°, Π½ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ-ΠΌΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ) ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ ΠΊΒ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π±Π΄ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ Π²Β ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΈΒ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π΅ ΡΒ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ
Π»Π΅Ρ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎ, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π·Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ (ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΒ ΡΠ°Π±Π΄ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΡΠΌ 1-Π³ΠΎΒ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°Β β Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition SyndromeΒ 1; RTPS1). ΠΡΠ»ΠΈ Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΠΌΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ» ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Ρ
Π»Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π±Π΅Π· ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ RTPS1 ΡΒ ΠΌΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ-ΠΌΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ ΠΌΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π²Β Β«Π³ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅Β» ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ·ΠΎΠ½Π°, ΡΠΎ ΡΒ Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π½Π΅ Π±ΡΠ΄Π΅Ρ ΡΠ°Π±Π΄ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ 20 Π»Π΅Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠ·Β β ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π½Π΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ². ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅Ρ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²Β ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π΅ 8β9-Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ·ΠΎ- Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ½Π°Β β Π‘ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ°, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΡ ΡΠΌΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΒ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ, Π½ΠΎ Π±Π΅Π· Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΒ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΡΒ ΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π΅Ρ Π°ΡΠ³ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΡΠΌΡΡ ΠΠΠ-Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΌ, ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΅Π², Π°Β ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ΅Π΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΠΊΠ·ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ (next-generation sequencingΒ β NGS), ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΊΠ·ΠΎΠ½Ρ Π³Π΅Π½Π°, Π°Β Π²ΡΠ΅ Π³Π΅Π½Ρ-ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΡ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ.
Fluorescence diagnosis of bladder cancer with agent hexasens - The results of multicenter trial
The results of multicenter trial for efficacy of fluorescence diagnosis for bladder cancer with agent hexasens (SSC Scientific Research Institute Organic Intermediates and Dyes, Russia) based on hexyl ester of 5-aminolevulinic acid compared with routine cystoscopy are represented in the article. The study included 124 patients. All patients had intravesical instillation of 50 ml of 0,2% hexasens. The exposure time accounted for 1-2 h. After removal of the drug from bladder standard cystoscopy followed by fluorescence diagnosis was performed in every patient. During the local fluorescence spectroscopy the intravesical instillation of the agent hexasens was shown to induce selective accumulation of photoactive protoporphyrin IX in tumor cells comparing with intact bladder mucosa. During 1 h after intravesical instillation of hexasens solution the level of fluorescence of hexasens-induced protoporphyrin IX in the tumor was higher than that in surrounding intact mucosa at average in 5.8 fold. As compared with results of standard cystoscopy, fluorescence diagnosis improved the sensitivity of the method by 24.4% (from 75.6% to 100%), the accuracy - by 15.2% (from 83.3% to 98.5%) and negative predictive value - by 33.5% (from 66.5% to 100%). Fluorescence diagnosis gave an opportunity to detect additional tumor foci, which were invisible in white light, in 27.4% of patients. For fluorescence diagnosis in 4.0% of patients false-positive fluorescence of bladder mucosa was detected that was probably due to inflammation. None of patients received active dose of the drug hexasens had adverse reactions, changes in general well-being and blood and urine parameters. According to the results of the study fluorescence diagnosis with hexasens for bladder cancer is recommended for use in clinical practice
Fluorescence diagnosis of bladder cancer with agent hexasens - The results of multicenter trial
The results of multicenter trial for efficacy of fluorescence diagnosis for bladder cancer with agent hexasens (SSC Scientific Research Institute Organic Intermediates and Dyes, Russia) based on hexyl ester of 5-aminolevulinic acid compared with routine cystoscopy are represented in the article. The study included 124 patients. All patients had intravesical instillation of 50 ml of 0,2% hexasens. The exposure time accounted for 1-2 h. After removal of the drug from bladder standard cystoscopy followed by fluorescence diagnosis was performed in every patient. During the local fluorescence spectroscopy the intravesical instillation of the agent hexasens was shown to induce selective accumulation of photoactive protoporphyrin IX in tumor cells comparing with intact bladder mucosa. During 1 h after intravesical instillation of hexasens solution the level of fluorescence of hexasens-induced protoporphyrin IX in the tumor was higher than that in surrounding intact mucosa at average in 5.8 fold. As compared with results of standard cystoscopy, fluorescence diagnosis improved the sensitivity of the method by 24.4% (from 75.6% to 100%), the accuracy - by 15.2% (from 83.3% to 98.5%) and negative predictive value - by 33.5% (from 66.5% to 100%). Fluorescence diagnosis gave an opportunity to detect additional tumor foci, which were invisible in white light, in 27.4% of patients. For fluorescence diagnosis in 4.0% of patients false-positive fluorescence of bladder mucosa was detected that was probably due to inflammation. None of patients received active dose of the drug hexasens had adverse reactions, changes in general well-being and blood and urine parameters. According to the results of the study fluorescence diagnosis with hexasens for bladder cancer is recommended for use in clinical practice