4 research outputs found
Phytosanitary features of pea morphotypes under the conditions of the Tyumen region
The selection material and finished varieties of peas for sowing different morphotypes of the grain direction were assessed for the formation of a phytosanitary state and productivity, and the effectiveness of protection methods. During the growing season, leaf and stem diseases were observed with varying degrees of development and timing of manifestation (p. Ascochyta, p. Uromyces, p. Erysiphe communis G) with development depending on the year and genus of the pathogen from 0.2-40%. The development of the river. Ascochyta - 10-20%, r. Erysiphe - 11-49%, p. Uromyces - 0.2-20%. Some resistance was determined in 22% of varieties p. Erysiphe communis G., 11% p. Ascochyta and 14% p. Uromyces. The yield for the period of study of pea varieties of the sowing grain direction varied from 3.2 to 4.6 t/ha, stable yields in the morphogroup chameleon with an increase of 0.64 t/ha or 17% to the standard. Protection of peas requires mandatory pre-sowing treatment with a chemical disinfectant, a biological preparation with the inclusion of an agrochemical in the mixture, which contributes to the development of the root system, activation of growth vigor, and a 70-90% reduction in pathogenic fungi on seeds and roots. Fungicidal protection in the budding phase - the formation of beans contributed to the preservation of the crop by 0.3-0.4 t/ha
Π€Π°Π³ΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΡ Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ·Π°
Objective: to study the circulation and prevalence of phage-resistant strains among opportunistic enterobacteria, isolated from children with disorders of intestinal microflora, in relation to domestic preparations of bacteriophages.Materials and methods. A bacteriological study of the fecal microflora of the colon in 970 young children for dysbiosis was carried out. The sensitivity of 720 antibiotic-resistant strains of opportunistic enterobacteriaceae (S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis and P. vulgaris, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, coagulase-negative staphylococci) isolated from children to domestic mono- and polyvalent drugs was studied (coliprotein, staphylococcal, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, purified Klebsiella pneumonia bacteriophage, βSextafagβ, Intesta bacteriophage). Determination of sensitivity to bacteriophages was carried out by the βsterile spotβ method. Antibiotic sensitivity was determined by the disk diffusion method. Statistical processing of the results was carried out using the Microsoft Office Excel 2007 software package.Results. A large percentage of phage-resistant strains with low sensitivity to bacteriophages was revealed among opportunistic bacteria, amounting to 54,2%, with the highest circulation among coagulase-negative staphylococci, Proteus, Klebsiella (more than 50%). A significant spread of intestinal dysbiosis was established in young children (87,5%), characterized by a low content of bifidobacteria and a high level of allocation of opportunistic enterobacteria, including in associations.Conclusion. As a result of the studies, a significant prevalence of phage-resistant strains in children with dysbiosis was revealed, which indicates the need for preliminary determination of their sensitivity to bacteriophages in order to resolve the issue of their possible inclusion in the intestinal microflora correction system.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ: ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ, Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°, ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΠ².ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ Ρ 970 Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° Π½Π° Π΄ΠΈΡΠ±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ·. ΠΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ 720 Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ (S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis ΠΈ P. vulgaris, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, ΠΊΠΎΠ°Π³ΡΠ»Π°Π·ΠΎΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠΎΠ²), Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΊ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΠ² (ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΉΠ½ΡΠΉ, ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ, ΡΠΈΠ½Π΅Π³Π½ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΡΠΉ, Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΡΠ°Π³ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Π±ΡΠΈΠ΅Π»Π» ΠΏΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ, Β«Π‘Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°Π³Β», ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ-Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΡΠ°Π³). ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π°ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Β«ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΡΠ½Π°Β». Π§ΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΠΎ-Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ. Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌ Microsoft Office Excel 2007.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ Ρ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΊ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π°ΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ (54,2%) Ρ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ°Π³ΡΠ»Π°Π·ΠΎΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π΅Π², ΠΊΠ»Π΅Π±ΡΠΈΠ΅Π»Π» (Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 50%). Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΡΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ² Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° (87,5%), Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π±ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ΠΌ Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅ Π² Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ
.ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π³ΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ² Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ Ρ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΌΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π°ΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ
Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°
Phytosanitary features of pea morphotypes under the conditions of the Tyumen region
The selection material and finished varieties of peas for sowing different morphotypes of the grain direction were assessed for the formation of a phytosanitary state and productivity, and the effectiveness of protection methods. During the growing season, leaf and stem diseases were observed with varying degrees of development and timing of manifestation (p. Ascochyta, p. Uromyces, p. Erysiphe communis G) with development depending on the year and genus of the pathogen from 0.2-40%. The development of the river. Ascochyta - 10-20%, r. Erysiphe - 11-49%, p. Uromyces - 0.2-20%. Some resistance was determined in 22% of varieties p. Erysiphe communis G., 11% p. Ascochyta and 14% p. Uromyces. The yield for the period of study of pea varieties of the sowing grain direction varied from 3.2 to 4.6 t/ha, stable yields in the morphogroup chameleon with an increase of 0.64 t/ha or 17% to the standard. Protection of peas requires mandatory pre-sowing treatment with a chemical disinfectant, a biological preparation with the inclusion of an agrochemical in the mixture, which contributes to the development of the root system, activation of growth vigor, and a 70-90% reduction in pathogenic fungi on seeds and roots. Fungicidal protection in the budding phase - the formation of beans contributed to the preservation of the crop by 0.3-0.4 t/ha