O brendiranju žigova i pečata

MBP staining of murine organotypic brain slices shows myelin health status of all MOG-positive samples (MOG 1-10) and MOG-negative control (Ctrl 1) as well as healthy control sample (HC 1) in combination with human complement. (DOCX 6029 kb

Covariance between the predicted and residual components of building beauty and image uploads: OLS and Negative Binomial estimates.

<p>Covariance between the predicted and residual components of building beauty and image uploads: OLS and Negative Binomial estimates.</p

Crowdsourcing architectural beauty: Online photo frequency predicts building aesthetic ratings

<div><p>The aesthetic quality of the built environment is of paramount importance to the quality of life of an increasingly urbanizing population. However, a lack of data has hindered the development of comprehensive measures of perceived architectural beauty. In this paper, we demonstrate that the local frequency of geotagged photos posted by internet users in two photo-sharing websites strongly predict the beauty ratings of buildings. We conduct an independent beauty survey with respondents rating proprietary stock photos of 1,000 buildings across the United States. Buildings with higher ratings were found more likely to be geotagged with user-uploaded photos in both Google Maps and Flickr. This correlation also holds for the beauty rankings of raters who seldom upload materials to the internet. Objective architectural characteristics that predict higher average beauty ratings of buildings also positively covary with their internet photo frequency. These results validate the use of localized user-generated image uploads in photo-sharing sites to measure the aesthetic appeal of the urban environment in the study of architecture, real estate, urbanism, planning, and environmental psychology.</p></div

Estimates survey score marginal gains from pictures in range.

<p>Estimates survey score marginal gains from pictures in range.</p

2014 image uploads within 50 meters of every building in four selected cities.

<p>2014 image uploads within 50 meters of every building in four selected cities.</p

Relational scatter plots of the average number of photos within 50 meters 138 uploaded to the two Panoramio data vintages (left panel) and Panoramio and Flickr 139 (right panel).

<p>Relational scatter plots of the average number of photos within 50 meters 138 uploaded to the two Panoramio data vintages (left panel) and Panoramio and Flickr 139 (right panel).</p

Summary statistics.

<p>Summary statistics.</p

Estimates of the relationship between image uploads and building beauty: OLS and PCF estimates.

<p>Estimates of the relationship between image uploads and building beauty: OLS and PCF estimates.</p

Data on brain volume and brain lesion-load MRI-acquired in patients with multiple sclerosis separated by the abnormalities found on the TBR.

<p>Abbreviations: TBR = trigeminal blink reflex; AbLat = patients with delayed latencies on the TBR;</p><p>AbEx = patients with enhanced R2c/R2 ratio and no latency abnormalities.</p>a<p>All data regarding to volume and lesion-load (expressed as mean and SD values in mm³) were normalized</p><p>to the individual brain size using a correction factor (VSCALING).</p

Data on response size calculated in healthy subjects and in patients categorized as AbEx and no-AbEx.

<p>Abbreviations: HS = healthy subjects; AbEx = patients with asymmetric response size and suspected abnormal excitability;</p><p>no-AbEx = patients that did not fulfill the criteria for AbEx; SBR = somatosensory blink reflex;</p><p>BRER = blink reflex excitability recovery; BRIP = blink reflex inhibition by a prepulse; R1 amp.  = amplitude of R1.</p><p>The individual's mean values (from right and left sides) on each response size measure were averaged for group comparison.</p>a<p>Arithmetic difference between sides (right and left) on each response parameter. *Significant differences (<i>p</i><0.05)</p><p>found in a subgroup of patients with respect to HS. ** Statistically significant differences found in AbEx patients with respect</p><p>to both HS and no-AbEx patients.</p