43 research outputs found
Hydrogenation of Dimethyl Carbonate to Methanol by <i>trans</i>-[Ru(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)(CO)] Catalysts: DFT Evidence for Ion-Pair-Mediated Metathesis Paths for C–OMe Bond Cleavage
Milstein and co-workers have reported
that the pincer complexes <i>trans</i>-[RuÂ(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)Â(CO)] catalyze the unprecedented
homogeneous hydrogenation of dimethyl carbonate to methanol. A mechanism
for this reaction was proposed on the basis of (i) carbonyl group
insertion into one of the Ru–H bonds to produce the six-coordinate <i>trans</i>-[RuÂ(OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>)Â(H)Â(PNN)Â(CO)] intermediate
and (ii) a metal–ligand cooperative transformation, involving
proton transfer from the phosphine arm of the PNN ligand to a methoxy
group of the Ru-coordinated [OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>−</sup> anion along with cleavage of a C–OMe bond, to produce methanol
and an O-bound methyl formate complex of the dearomatized square-pyramidal
form of the catalyst, [RuÂ(H)Â(PNN)Â(CO)]. We investigate herein the
possibility of an alternative reaction pathway proceeding as (i) an
outer-sphere hydride transfer from [RuÂ(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)Â(CO)] to
the carbonyl of dimethyl carbonate to give an ion pair of the cationic
metal fragment and the [OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>−</sup> anion
in which the C–H bond is facing the metal center, (ii) reorientation
of the [OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>−</sup> anion within the
intact ion pair to coordinate a methoxy group to the metal, and (iii)
C–OMe bond cleavage (methoxide abstraction by the cationic
ruthenium center) to yield methyl formate and <i>trans</i>-[RuÂ(H)Â(OMe)Â(PNN)Â(CO)]. Using DFT calculations applied at the M06
and ωB97X-D levels with a polarizable continuum representing
THF as solvent, we calculate the energy profile of this pathway to
be significantly lower than the metal–ligand cooperative pathway.
The analogous pathway is also favored for the reaction of [RuÂ(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)Â(CO)] with methyl formate. The new mechanism corresponds
to a direct metathesis transformation in which a hydride and an alkoxide
are exchanged between a metal center and a carbonyl group via an outer
sphere ion pair formation and reorientation of the alkoxide anion.
The calculations also indicate that the metathesis can proceed indirectly
via outer sphere ion pair mediated carbonyl insertion of dimethyl
carbonate and methyl formate to give [RuÂ(H)Â(OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>)Â(PNN)Â(CO)]
and [RuÂ(H)Â(OCH<sub>2</sub>OMe)Â(PNN)Â(CO)], respectively, as intermediates,
followed by ion pair mediated deinsertion of methyl formate or formaldehyde.
Inclusion of one methanol molecule as an explicit H-bond donor solvent
does not change the main conclusions of the study
Hydrogenation of Dimethyl Carbonate to Methanol by <i>trans</i>-[Ru(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)(CO)] Catalysts: DFT Evidence for Ion-Pair-Mediated Metathesis Paths for C–OMe Bond Cleavage
Milstein and co-workers have reported
that the pincer complexes <i>trans</i>-[RuÂ(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)Â(CO)] catalyze the unprecedented
homogeneous hydrogenation of dimethyl carbonate to methanol. A mechanism
for this reaction was proposed on the basis of (i) carbonyl group
insertion into one of the Ru–H bonds to produce the six-coordinate <i>trans</i>-[RuÂ(OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>)Â(H)Â(PNN)Â(CO)] intermediate
and (ii) a metal–ligand cooperative transformation, involving
proton transfer from the phosphine arm of the PNN ligand to a methoxy
group of the Ru-coordinated [OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>−</sup> anion along with cleavage of a C–OMe bond, to produce methanol
and an O-bound methyl formate complex of the dearomatized square-pyramidal
form of the catalyst, [RuÂ(H)Â(PNN)Â(CO)]. We investigate herein the
possibility of an alternative reaction pathway proceeding as (i) an
outer-sphere hydride transfer from [RuÂ(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)Â(CO)] to
the carbonyl of dimethyl carbonate to give an ion pair of the cationic
metal fragment and the [OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>−</sup> anion
in which the C–H bond is facing the metal center, (ii) reorientation
of the [OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>−</sup> anion within the
intact ion pair to coordinate a methoxy group to the metal, and (iii)
C–OMe bond cleavage (methoxide abstraction by the cationic
ruthenium center) to yield methyl formate and <i>trans</i>-[RuÂ(H)Â(OMe)Â(PNN)Â(CO)]. Using DFT calculations applied at the M06
and ωB97X-D levels with a polarizable continuum representing
THF as solvent, we calculate the energy profile of this pathway to
be significantly lower than the metal–ligand cooperative pathway.
The analogous pathway is also favored for the reaction of [RuÂ(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)Â(CO)] with methyl formate. The new mechanism corresponds
to a direct metathesis transformation in which a hydride and an alkoxide
are exchanged between a metal center and a carbonyl group via an outer
sphere ion pair formation and reorientation of the alkoxide anion.
The calculations also indicate that the metathesis can proceed indirectly
via outer sphere ion pair mediated carbonyl insertion of dimethyl
carbonate and methyl formate to give [RuÂ(H)Â(OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>)Â(PNN)Â(CO)]
and [RuÂ(H)Â(OCH<sub>2</sub>OMe)Â(PNN)Â(CO)], respectively, as intermediates,
followed by ion pair mediated deinsertion of methyl formate or formaldehyde.
Inclusion of one methanol molecule as an explicit H-bond donor solvent
does not change the main conclusions of the study
Hydrogenation of Dimethyl Carbonate to Methanol by <i>trans</i>-[Ru(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)(CO)] Catalysts: DFT Evidence for Ion-Pair-Mediated Metathesis Paths for C–OMe Bond Cleavage
Milstein and co-workers have reported
that the pincer complexes <i>trans</i>-[RuÂ(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)Â(CO)] catalyze the unprecedented
homogeneous hydrogenation of dimethyl carbonate to methanol. A mechanism
for this reaction was proposed on the basis of (i) carbonyl group
insertion into one of the Ru–H bonds to produce the six-coordinate <i>trans</i>-[RuÂ(OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>)Â(H)Â(PNN)Â(CO)] intermediate
and (ii) a metal–ligand cooperative transformation, involving
proton transfer from the phosphine arm of the PNN ligand to a methoxy
group of the Ru-coordinated [OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>−</sup> anion along with cleavage of a C–OMe bond, to produce methanol
and an O-bound methyl formate complex of the dearomatized square-pyramidal
form of the catalyst, [RuÂ(H)Â(PNN)Â(CO)]. We investigate herein the
possibility of an alternative reaction pathway proceeding as (i) an
outer-sphere hydride transfer from [RuÂ(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)Â(CO)] to
the carbonyl of dimethyl carbonate to give an ion pair of the cationic
metal fragment and the [OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>−</sup> anion
in which the C–H bond is facing the metal center, (ii) reorientation
of the [OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>−</sup> anion within the
intact ion pair to coordinate a methoxy group to the metal, and (iii)
C–OMe bond cleavage (methoxide abstraction by the cationic
ruthenium center) to yield methyl formate and <i>trans</i>-[RuÂ(H)Â(OMe)Â(PNN)Â(CO)]. Using DFT calculations applied at the M06
and ωB97X-D levels with a polarizable continuum representing
THF as solvent, we calculate the energy profile of this pathway to
be significantly lower than the metal–ligand cooperative pathway.
The analogous pathway is also favored for the reaction of [RuÂ(H)<sub>2</sub>(PNN)Â(CO)] with methyl formate. The new mechanism corresponds
to a direct metathesis transformation in which a hydride and an alkoxide
are exchanged between a metal center and a carbonyl group via an outer
sphere ion pair formation and reorientation of the alkoxide anion.
The calculations also indicate that the metathesis can proceed indirectly
via outer sphere ion pair mediated carbonyl insertion of dimethyl
carbonate and methyl formate to give [RuÂ(H)Â(OCHÂ(OMe)<sub>2</sub>)Â(PNN)Â(CO)]
and [RuÂ(H)Â(OCH<sub>2</sub>OMe)Â(PNN)Â(CO)], respectively, as intermediates,
followed by ion pair mediated deinsertion of methyl formate or formaldehyde.
Inclusion of one methanol molecule as an explicit H-bond donor solvent
does not change the main conclusions of the study
Continuous-Flow Alkane Dehydrogenation by Supported Pincer-Ligated Iridium Catalysts at Elevated Temperatures
Pincer-ligated
iridium complexes of the form [IrÂ(<sup>R4</sup>PCP)ÂL]
(<sup>R4</sup>PCP = κ<sup>3</sup>-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-(XPR<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>; X = CH<sub>2</sub>, O; R = <i>t</i>Bu, <i>i</i>Pr) are efficient homogeneous alkane
dehydrogenation catalysts that have been reported to be highly active
at temperatures of 240 °C or below. In this work, silica-supported
[IrÂ(C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)Â(<i>p</i>-<sup><i>t</i></sup>Bu<sub>2</sub>PO-<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>POCOP)] (<b>1/SiO</b><sub><b>2</b></sub>) was used to study a model
continuous-flow gas-phase acceptorless alkane dehydrogenation system.
This particular supported framework is thermally stable at temperatures
up to 340 °C, 100 °C above the highest temperature at which
analogous homogeneous complexes have been reported to show stable
activity, with observed butane dehydrogenation rates of ca. 80 mol<sub>butenes</sub> mol<sub>cat.</sub><sup>–1</sup> h<sup>–1</sup>. Solid-state <sup>31</sup>P MAS NMR and ATR IR are used to demonstrate
that the backbone pincer ligand remains intact and coordinated at
340 °C. The complex is fully converted to [IrÂ(CO)Â(<i>p</i>-<sup><i>t</i></sup>Bu<sub>2</sub>PO-<sup><i>t</i>Bu4</sup>POCOP)] (<b>3/SiO</b><sub><b>2</b></sub>) above
300 °C. <b>3/SiO</b><sub><b>2</b></sub> is observed
to be catalytically active at the higher temperatures tested, and
reaction rates are comparable to those of <b>1/SiO</b><sub><b>2</b></sub>. <b>3/SiO</b><sub><b>2</b></sub> and <b>1/SiO</b><sub><b>2</b></sub> act as resting states for the
active 14-electron fragment, through dissociation of the CO or olefin
ligand, respectively. Given that <b>3/SiO</b><sub><b>2</b></sub> is air resistant at ambient temperature and is structurally
stable and catalytically active at elevated temperatures, it is a
suitable candidate as a catalyst for the highly endothermic acceptorless
dehydrogenation of alkanes
Alkane Dehydrogenation by C–H Activation at Iridium(III)
Stoichiometric alkane dehydrogenation utilizing an Ir<sup>III</sup> pincer complex, (<sup><i>dm</i></sup>Phebox)ÂIrÂ(OAc)<sub>2</sub>(OH<sub>2</sub>) (<b>1a</b>), has been described. The
reaction between <b>1a</b> and octane resulted in quantitative
formation of (<sup><i>dm</i></sup>Phebox)ÂIrÂ(OAc)Â(H) (<b>3a</b>) and octene. At early reaction times 1-octene is the major
product, indicative of terminal C–H activation by <b>1a</b>. In contrast to prior reports of alkane dehydrogenation with Ir,
C–H bond activation occurs at Ir<sup>III</sup> and the dehydrogenation
is not inhibited by nitrogen, olefin, or water
Selective Dehydrogenative Coupling of Ethylene to Butadiene via an Iridacyclopentane Complex
An
iridium complex is found to catalyze the selective dehydrogenative
coupling of ethylene to 1,3-butadiene. The key intermediate, and a
major resting state, is an iridacyclopentane that undergoes a surprisingly
facile β-H elimination, enabled by a partial dechelation (κ<sup>3</sup>–κ<sup>2</sup>) of the supporting 3,5-dimethylphenyl-2,6-bisÂ(oxazolinyl)
ligand
Selective Dehydrogenative Coupling of Ethylene to Butadiene via an Iridacyclopentane Complex
An
iridium complex is found to catalyze the selective dehydrogenative
coupling of ethylene to 1,3-butadiene. The key intermediate, and a
major resting state, is an iridacyclopentane that undergoes a surprisingly
facile β-H elimination, enabled by a partial dechelation (κ<sup>3</sup>–κ<sup>2</sup>) of the supporting 3,5-dimethylphenyl-2,6-bisÂ(oxazolinyl)
ligand
Regeneration of an Iridium(III) Complex Active for Alkane Dehydrogenation Using Molecular Oxygen
(<sup><i>dm</i></sup>Phebox)ÂIrÂ(OAc)<sub>2</sub>(OH<sub>2</sub>) (<b>1a</b>) has previously been found to promote stoichiometric
alkane dehydrogenation, affording alkene, acetic acid, and the corresponding
Ir hydride complex (<sup><i>dm</i></sup>Phebox)ÂIrÂ(OAc)Â(H)
(<b>2a</b>) in high yield. In this study, we describe the use
of oxygen to quantitatively regenerate <b>1a</b> from <b>2a</b> and HOAc. Distinct reaction intermediates are observed
during the conversion of <b>2a</b> to <b>1a</b>, depending
upon the presence or absence of 1 equiv of acetic acid, highlighting
potential mechanistic implications regarding alkane dehydrogenation
catalysis and the use of oxygen as an oxidant in such systems
Alkane Dehydrogenation by C–H Activation at Iridium(III)
Stoichiometric alkane dehydrogenation utilizing an Ir<sup>III</sup> pincer complex, (<sup><i>dm</i></sup>Phebox)ÂIrÂ(OAc)<sub>2</sub>(OH<sub>2</sub>) (<b>1a</b>), has been described. The
reaction between <b>1a</b> and octane resulted in quantitative
formation of (<sup><i>dm</i></sup>Phebox)ÂIrÂ(OAc)Â(H) (<b>3a</b>) and octene. At early reaction times 1-octene is the major
product, indicative of terminal C–H activation by <b>1a</b>. In contrast to prior reports of alkane dehydrogenation with Ir,
C–H bond activation occurs at Ir<sup>III</sup> and the dehydrogenation
is not inhibited by nitrogen, olefin, or water
Regeneration of an Iridium(III) Complex Active for Alkane Dehydrogenation Using Molecular Oxygen
(<sup><i>dm</i></sup>Phebox)ÂIrÂ(OAc)<sub>2</sub>(OH<sub>2</sub>) (<b>1a</b>) has previously been found to promote stoichiometric
alkane dehydrogenation, affording alkene, acetic acid, and the corresponding
Ir hydride complex (<sup><i>dm</i></sup>Phebox)ÂIrÂ(OAc)Â(H)
(<b>2a</b>) in high yield. In this study, we describe the use
of oxygen to quantitatively regenerate <b>1a</b> from <b>2a</b> and HOAc. Distinct reaction intermediates are observed
during the conversion of <b>2a</b> to <b>1a</b>, depending
upon the presence or absence of 1 equiv of acetic acid, highlighting
potential mechanistic implications regarding alkane dehydrogenation
catalysis and the use of oxygen as an oxidant in such systems