Perioperative platelet inhibition in transurethral interventions: TURP/TURB

PURPOSE: To determine whether transurethral surgery under platelet inhibition is a feasible procedure. Before transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) or bladder tumours (TURB), the administration of platelet-inhibiting medication is often interrupted due to possible bleeding complications. We studied the performance of TURP and TURB under the current recommendations of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) on perioperative platelet inhibition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients assigned for transurethral intervention were preoperatively divided into the following risk groups: low, medium and high cardio- or cerebrovascular risk. In patients with a low-risk profile, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) was discontinued. Patients of the medium risk group continued taking 100 mg of ASA. Patients of the high-risk group receiving dual platelet inhibition (ASA + clopidogrel) were not treated operatively. In total 346 patients from the low and medium risk groups underwent transurethral intervention. RESULTS: Forty-two out of 198 TURP were performed under 100 mg of ASA. Without ASA, a significantly shorter length of stay and earlier removal of the transurethral catheter was documented. In the parameters postoperative haemorrhage and operative revision, no significant differences were observed. Thirty-two out of 148 TURB were performed under 100 mg of ASA. Regarding the length of stay, time until catheter removal, postoperative haemorrhage and operative revision, no significant differences were found under ASA. Only significantly longer continuous irrigation was documented under ASA. CONCLUSION: In the case of a verified indication for use of platelet inhibitors, it is possible to avoid discontinuation and the consequent increased risk of thromboembolic incidents in transurethral surgery is admissible

Analgesic efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after transurethral resection of prostate

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), administered as intramuscular diclofenac in comparison with intravenous paracetamol after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty men, aged 55 to 75 years, undergoing TURP at our hospital were included in this study. Patients were divided randomly and prospectively into two groups (25 patients in each group). Group I (NSAID) received 75 mg of diclofenac i.m. at the end of the operation followed by 75 mg of diclofenac i.m. for 24 hours (75 mg x 2 once a day = 150 mg/24 h) postoperatively. The other group (Group II) consisted of patients who received 1g/100 mL i.v. paracetamol 15 minutes twice daily as postoperative analgesia. Postoperative pain scores were evaluated at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours after administration of each analgesic, using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Furthermore, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels and hemostatic variables (bleeding time, prothrombine time and the international normalized ratio?, i.e. the ratio of a patient's prothrombin time to a normal [control] sample) were recorded in all patients. RESULTS: The pain score changes during a 4 hour period between the two groups was similar (p = 0.162). Thirty minutes after surgery, pain scores were high (> 3 cm) in both groups and without differences between groups (p = 0.11) but 6 hours after surgery, pain scores were significantly higher with paracetamol compared to diclofenac (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding the amount of resected tissue, operating time, preoperative-postoperative Hb levels and hemostatic variables. In the both groups, no patient required blood transfusion postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs are not a contraindication to TURP and should be used for the control of postoperative pain if indicated