25 research outputs found

    Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Get PDF
    Background: Evidence regarding whether imaging can be used effectively to select patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is scarce. We aimed to investigate the association between baseline imaging features and safety and efficacy of EVT in acute ischaemic stroke caused by anterior large-vessel occlusion. Methods: In this meta-analysis of individual patient-level data, the HERMES collaboration identified in PubMed seven randomised trials in endovascular stroke that compared EVT with standard medical therapy, published between Jan 1, 2010, and Oct 31, 2017. Only trials that required vessel imaging to identify patients with proximal anterior circulation ischaemic stroke and that used predominantly stent retrievers or second-generation neurothrombectomy devices in the EVT group were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane handbook methodology. Central investigators, masked to clinical information other than stroke side, categorised baseline imaging features of ischaemic change with the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) or according to involvement of more than 33% of middle cerebral artery territory, and by thrombus volume, hyperdensity, and collateral status. The primary endpoint was neurological functional disability scored on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days after randomisation. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, parenchymal haematoma type 2 within 5 days of randomisation, and mortality within 90 days. For the primary analysis, we used mixed-methods ordinal logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission, intravenous alteplase, and time from onset to randomisation, and we used interaction terms to test whether imaging categorisation at baseline modifies the association between treatment and outcome. This meta-analysis was prospectively designed by the HERMES executive committee but has not been registered. Findings: Among 1764 pooled patients, 871 were allocated to the EVT group and 893 to the control group. Risk of bias was low except in the THRACE study, which used unblinded assessment of outcomes 90 days after randomisation and MRI predominantly as the primary baseline imaging tool. The overall treatment effect favoured EVT (adjusted common odds ratio [cOR] for a shift towards better outcome on the mRS 2·00, 95% CI 1·69–2·38; p<0·0001). EVT achieved better outcomes at 90 days than standard medical therapy alone across a broad range of baseline imaging categories. Mortality at 90 days (14·7% vs 17·3%, p=0·15), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (3·8% vs 3·5%, p=0·90), and parenchymal haematoma type 2 (5·6% vs 4·8%, p=0·52) did not differ between the EVT and control groups. No treatment effect modification by baseline imaging features was noted for mortality at 90 days and parenchymal haematoma type 2. Among patients with ASPECTS 0–4, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was seen in ten (19%) of 52 patients in the EVT group versus three (5%) of 66 patients in the control group (adjusted cOR 3·94, 95% CI 0·94–16·49; pinteraction=0·025), and among patients with more than 33% involvement of middle cerebral artery territory, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was observed in 15 (14%) of 108 patients in the EVT group versus four (4%) of 113 patients in the control group (4·17, 1·30–13·44, pinteraction=0·012). Interpretation: EVT achieves better outcomes at 90 days than standard medical therapy across a broad range of baseline imaging categories, including infarcts affecting more than 33% of middle cerebral artery territory or ASPECTS less than 6, although in these patients the risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was higher in the EVT group than the control group. This analysis provides preliminary evidence for potential use of EVT in patients with large infarcts at baseline. Funding: Medtronic

    Autoimmune encephalopathy and drug refractory seizures with the presence of two autoantibodies specific for the neuronal cell surface

    Get PDF
    Background: An increasing number of autoantibodies are being described in epilepsy and other seizure-related disorders. A pathogenic role of autoantibodies in epilepsy has been suggested based on observations of the efficacy of immunotherapy. Objective: This study aimed to report a new case of autoimmune-mediated encephalopathy and seizures caused by autoantibodies to voltage-gated potassium channels (VGKCs) and voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) (P/Q-type) and the response to immunotherapy. Design: This study follows a case report design. Setting: This study was conducted in a tertiary care center. Patients: Our patient was an eighteen-year-old female with new-onset encephalopathy and refractory seizures. Intervention: Our patient was treated for five days with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Results: After treatment with IVMP and IVIG, our patient showed significant clinical improvement and did not exhibit any seizures during the one-month follow-up period. Conclusions: Here, we report a rare case of an autoimmune encephalopathy and seizures associated with the presence of two surface neuronal autoantibodies. This report highlights the importance of early diagnosis of autoimmune epilepsy, as early immunomodulating treatments improve the outcome

    Central Nervous System Brucellosis Granuloma and White Matter Disease in Immunocompromised Patient

    No full text
    Brucellosis is a multisystem zoonotic disease. We report an unusual case of neurobrucellosis with seizures in an immunocompromised patient in Saudi Arabia who underwent renal transplantation. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed diffuse white matter lesions. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid were positive for Brucella sp. Granuloma was detected in a brain biopsy specimen

    Multimodality CT based imaging to determine clot characteristics and recanalization with intravenous tPA in patients with acute ischemic stroke

    No full text
    Abstract Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a common neurovascular emergency causing significant burden to society. Currently the main focus of AIS treatment is to restore blood flow to at risk brain tissue. For the last twenty years, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) was the only proven therapy for patients with AIS. More recently, five randomized clinical trials established the efficacy of endovascular therapy with or without intravenous tPA in selected patient populations with AIS. Not all stroke patients benefit from intravenous tPA or endovascular treatment. Nonetheless, the concept of early recanalization of occluded arteries resulting in better clinical outcomes is well established. In this focused review, we will discuss how imaging modalities such as Non-Contrast CT, CT-Angiography, and CT-Perfusion can potentially help physicians determine which patients are likely to recanalize early with intravenous tPA and therefore benefit from this therapy

    sj-pdf-2-eso-10.1177_23969873231201715 – Supplemental material for Endovascular therapy versus best medical management for isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-eso-10.1177_23969873231201715 for Endovascular therapy versus best medical management for isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Ahmed Alkhiri, Aser F Alamri, Abdullah R Alharbi, Ahmed A Almaghrabi, Nayef Alansari, Abdulelah A Niaz, Basil A Alghamdi, Amrou Sarraj, Adel Alhazzani and Fahad S Al-Ajlan in European Stroke Journal</p

    sj-pdf-1-eso-10.1177_23969873231201715 – Supplemental material for Endovascular therapy versus best medical management for isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-eso-10.1177_23969873231201715 for Endovascular therapy versus best medical management for isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Ahmed Alkhiri, Aser F Alamri, Abdullah R Alharbi, Ahmed A Almaghrabi, Nayef Alansari, Abdulelah A Niaz, Basil A Alghamdi, Amrou Sarraj, Adel Alhazzani and Fahad S Al-Ajlan in European Stroke Journal</p

    Discrepancy between post-treatment infarct volume and 90-day outcome in the ESCAPE randomized controlled trial.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Some patients with ischemic stroke have poor outcomes despite small infarcts after endovascular thrombectomy, while others with large infarcts sometimes fare better. AIMS: We explored factors associated with such discrepancies between post-treatment infarct volume (PIV) and functional outcome. METHODS: We identified patients with small PIV (volume ≤ 25th percentile) and large PIV (volume ≥ 75th percentile) on 24-48-h CT/MRI in the ESCAPE randomized-controlled trial. Demographics, comorbidities, baseline, and 24-48-h stroke severity (NIHSS), stroke location, treatment type, post-stroke complications, and other outcome scales like Barthel Index, and EQ-5D were compared between discrepant cases - those with 90-day modified Rankin Scale(mRS) ≤ 2 despite large PIV or mRS ≥ 3 despite small PIV - and non-discrepant cases . Multi-variable logistic regression was used to identify pre-treatment and post-treatment factors associated with small-PIV/mRS ≥ 3 and large-PIV/mRS ≤ 2. Sensitivity analyses used different definitions of small/large PIV and good/poor outcome. RESULTS: Among 315 patients, median PIV was 21 mL; 27/79 (34.2%) patients with PIV ≤ 7 mL (25th percentile) had mRS ≥ 3; 12/80 (15.0%) with PIV ≥ 72 mL (75th percentile) had mRS ≤ 2. Discrepant cases did not differ by CT versus MRI-based PIV ascertainment, or right versus left-hemisphere involvement ( CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies between functional ability and PIV are likely explained by differences in age, comorbidities, and post-stroke complications, emphasizing the need for high-quality post-thrombectomy stroke care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01778335
    corecore