3 research outputs found

    Facial Emotion Recognition with Sparse Coding Descriptor

    Get PDF
    With the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic ravaging the world, all sectors of life were affected including education. This led to many schools taking distance learning through the use of computer as a safer option. Facial emotion means a lot to teacher’s assessment of his performance and relation to his students. Researchers has been working on improving the face monitoring and human machine interface. In this paper we presented different types of face recognition methods which include: Principal component analysis (PCA); Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF); Local binary pattern (LBP); Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and also the group sparse coding (GSC) and come up with the fusion of LBP, PCA, SURF GLCM with GSC. Linear Kernel Support Vector Machine (LSVM) Classifier out-performed Polynomial, RBF and Sigmoid kernels SVM in the emotion classification. Results obtained from experiments indicated that, the new fusion method is capable of differentiating different types of face emotions with higher accuracy compare with the state-of-the-art methods currently available

    Energy-aware message distribution algorithm for enhance FANET pipeline surveillance reliability

    No full text
    Features such as the communication scheme, energy awareness, and task distribution amongst others are the key component that characterizes the Flying Ad-hoc Network (FANET). The operational efficiency in FANET surveying a specific region is affected by the nature of the UAVs' node placement, routing protocol, energy-aware task distribution, and node interaction amongst others. In this paper, Drone 1 (D1), Master Drone (DM), and Drone 2 (D2) were used to survey a pipeline of length 12.2 m. This paper aims at minimising energy use by drones during surveillance using energy-aware node exchange technique, task interaction and distribution scheme for each UAV. Due to fast energy depletion of DM due to packets aggregation, its election is based on the UAV with the highest energy before take-off. For two different simulations, 14,697.0 J and 14,836.6 J were obtained for DM. To avoid system failure due to fast energy loss of DM, the drones swapped positions and status. First swapping command comes up when DM loses 50% of its energy, while the second command occurs when it further loses 15%. Return to base threshold energy is computed for the three UAVs to avoid crash due to insufficient energy during surveillance. DM returns to base threshold energy for both single and double swapping simulation were 658.105 J and 652.456 J respectively. From the results obtained the algorithms were able to exchange nodes to maximize energy usage and perform an interaction-based task distribution for cooperative task sharing during surveillance. This translates into longer surveillance time and effective telemetry data aggregation

    Geoeconomic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management, and outcomes in invasively ventilated intensive care unit patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pooled analysis of four observational studies

    No full text
    Background: Geoeconomic variations in epidemiology, the practice of ventilation, and outcome in invasively ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain unexplored. In this analysis we aim to address these gaps using individual patient data of four large observational studies. Methods: In this pooled analysis we harmonised individual patient data from the ERICC, LUNG SAFE, PRoVENT, and PRoVENT-iMiC prospective observational studies, which were conducted from June, 2011, to December, 2018, in 534 ICUs in 54 countries. We used the 2016 World Bank classification to define two geoeconomic regions: middle-income countries (MICs) and high-income countries (HICs). ARDS was defined according to the Berlin criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patients in MICs versus HICs. The primary outcome was the use of low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for the first 3 days of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were key ventilation parameters (tidal volume size, positive end-expiratory pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, peak pressure, plateau pressure, driving pressure, and respiratory rate), patient characteristics, the risk for and actual development of acute respiratory distress syndrome after the first day of ventilation, duration of ventilation, ICU length of stay, and ICU mortality. Findings: Of the 7608 patients included in the original studies, this analysis included 3852 patients without ARDS, of whom 2345 were from MICs and 1507 were from HICs. Patients in MICs were younger, shorter and with a slightly lower body-mass index, more often had diabetes and active cancer, but less often chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure than patients from HICs. Sequential organ failure assessment scores were similar in MICs and HICs. Use of LTVV in MICs and HICs was comparable (42·4% vs 44·2%; absolute difference -1·69 [-9·58 to 6·11] p=0·67; data available in 3174 [82%] of 3852 patients). The median applied positive end expiratory pressure was lower in MICs than in HICs (5 [IQR 5-8] vs 6 [5-8] cm H2O; p=0·0011). ICU mortality was higher in MICs than in HICs (30·5% vs 19·9%; p=0·0004; adjusted effect 16·41% [95% CI 9·52-23·52]; p<0·0001) and was inversely associated with gross domestic product (adjusted odds ratio for a US$10 000 increase per capita 0·80 [95% CI 0·75-0·86]; p<0·0001). Interpretation: Despite similar disease severity and ventilation management, ICU mortality in patients without ARDS is higher in MICs than in HICs, with a strong association with country-level economic status
    corecore