The role of the anatomy of the sigmoid colon in developing sigmoid volvulus: A case-control study

Sigmoid volvulus is a common condition throughout much of the world. To this date, there are no adequately controlled clinical trials examining the role of anatomy in sigmoid volvulus. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if the anatomic dimensions of the sigmoid colon differ in sigmoid volvulus compared to controls. This prospective case–control study was conducted at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi. Cases included individuals 18 years or older with surgically confirmed sigmoid volvulus, while controls included individuals undergoing surgery for reasons unrelated to the descending or sigmoid colon, or rectum. Intraoperative measurements of the sigmoid colon were taken, including mesosigmoid root width and mesosigmoid length. A total of 26 cases and 12 controls were enrolled. When compared to controls, the mesosigmoid of cases had a greater length and maximal width; however, mesosigmoid root width was similar between groups. These findings support the assertion that sigmoid volvulus is due to a long and wide mesosigmoid that rotates on a constant mesosigmoid root width. This is the first adequately controlled trial examining anatomy in sigmoid volvulus and provides strong evidence that refines prior hypotheses regarding the anatomic basis of sigmoid volvulus

Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Risk Factors in a Pediatric Population

Background Central venous line (CVL) placement in children is often necessary for treatment and may be complicated by central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). We hypothesize that line type and clinical and demographic factors at line placement impact CLABSI rates. Methods This is a single-institution case-control study of pediatric patients (≤18 years old) admitted between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Case patients had a documented CLABSI. Control patients had a CVL placed during the study period and were matched by sex and age in a 2:1 ratio. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Results We identified 78 patients with a CLABSI and 140 patients without a CLABSI. After controlling for pertinent covariates, patients undergoing tunneled or non-tunneled CVL had higher odds of CLABSI than those undergoing PICC (OR 2.51, CI 1.12-5.64 and OR 3.88, CI 1.06-14.20 respectively), and patients undergoing port placement had decreased odds of CLABSI compared to PICC (OR .05, CI 0.01-.51). There were lower odds of CLABSI when lines were placed for intravenous medications compared to those placed for solid tumor malignancy (OR .15, CI .03-.79). Race and age were not statistically significant risk factors. Discussion Central lines placed for medication administration compared to solid tumors, PICC compared to tunneled and non-tunneled central lines, and ports compared to PICC were associated with lower odds of CLABSI. Future improvement efforts should focus on PICC and port placement in appropriate patients to decrease CLABSI rates

Difference in Postoperative Outcomes and Perioperative Resource Utilization Between General Surgeons and Pediatric Surgeons: A Systematic Review

Background: Both general surgeons (GS) and pediatric surgeons (PS) perform a high volume of appendectomies in pediatric patients, but there is a paucity of data on these outcomes based on surgeon training. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare postoperative outcomes and perioperative resource utilization for pediatric appendectomies.Methods: We searched PubMed to identify articles examining the association between surgeon specialization and outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing appendectomies. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and quality assessment were performed by one reviewer, with another reviewer to resolve discrepancies.Results: We identified 4799 articles, with 98.4% (4724/2799) concordance after initial review. Following resolution of discrepancies, 16 studies met inclusion criteria. Of the studies that reported each outcome, GS and PS demonstrated similar rates of readmission within 30 days (pooled RR 1.61 95% CI 0.66, 2.55) wound infections (pooled RR 1.07, 95% CI .55, 1.60), use of laparoscopic surgery (pooled RR 1.87, 95% CI .21, 3.53), postoperative complications (pooled RR 1.40, 95% CI .83, 1.97), use of preoperative imaging (pooled RR .98,95% CI .90, 1.05), and intra-abdominal abscesses (pooled RR .80, 95% CI .03, 1.58). Patients treated by GS did have a significantly higher risk of negative appendectomies (pooled RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10, 1.84) when compared to PS.Discussion: This is the first meta-analysis to compare outcomes for pediatric appendectomies performed by GS compared to PS. Patient outcomes and resource utilization were similar among PS and GS, except for negative appendectomies were significantly more likely with GS

The Effect of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol on Pediatric Colorectal Surgical Patient Outcomes at a Single Institution

Introduction Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) have been associated with fewer postoperative complications in adult colorectal surgery patients, but there is a paucity of data on pediatric patients. Our aim is to describe the effect of an ERP, compared to conventional care, on pediatric colorectal surgical complications. Materials and Methods We performed a single institution, retrospective cohort study (2014-2020) on pediatric (≤18 years old) colorectal surgery patients pre- and post-implementation of an ERP. Bivariate analysis and logistic regression were used to assess the effect of an ERP on return visits to the emergency room, reoperation, and readmission within 30-days. Results There were 194 patients included in this study, with 54 in the control cohort and 140 in the ERP cohort. There was no significant difference in the age, BMI, primary diagnosis, or use of laparoscopic technique between the cohorts. The ERP cohort had a significantly shorter foley duration, postoperative stay, and had nerve blocks performed. After controlling for pertinent covariates, the ERP cohort experienced higher odds of reoperation within 30 days (OR 5.83, P = .04). There was no significant difference in the other outcomes analyzed. Conclusion In this study, there was no difference in the odds of overall complications, readmission or return to the ER within 30-days of surgery. However, although infrequent, there were higher odds of returns to the OR within 30 days. Future studies are needed to analyze how adherence to individual components may influence patient outcomes to ensure patient safety during ERP implementation

Hospital-based injury data in Malawi: strategies for data collection and feasibility of trauma scoring tools

Injury is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries. Utilizing a partnership between Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH) and the University of North Carolina Departments of Surgery, we describe an approach to injury surveillance, examine the utility of trauma scoring systems, and outline steps necessary before such scoring systems can be reliably instituted in a resource-constrained setting

Epidemiology of Injuries at a Tertiary Care Center in Malawi

Injury surveillance is an ongoing process required for primary, secondary, and tertiary injury prevention. In Malawi, hospital-based injury data are not available

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of HIV-infected, ART-naïve individuals at screening visit, stratified by clinical trial and pregnancy status.

<p>Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of HIV-infected, ART-naïve individuals at screening visit, stratified by clinical trial and pregnancy status.</p