3 research outputs found
Concurrent High-Sensitivity Conductometric Detection of Volatile Weak Acids in a Suppressed Anion Chromatography System
A suppressed hydroxide eluent anion
chromatograph effluent flows
through the outside of a gas-permeable membrane tube while electrogenerated
100–200 μM LiOH flows through the lumen into a second
conductivity detector. Undissociated volatile acid eluites (e.g.,
H<sub>2</sub>S, HCN, H<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>, etc., represented
as HA) transfer through the membrane and react as OH<sup>–</sup> + HA → A<sup>–</sup> + H<sub>2</sub>O; the conversion
of high-mobility OH<sup>–</sup> to lower mobility A<sup>–</sup> results in a significant negative response for these analytes. With
the chromatograph operated at a macroscale (0.3 mL/min) the LiOH flow
can be 3–30-fold lower, resulting in corresponding enrichment
of the transferred analyte prior to detection. Because there is no
mixing of liquids, the detector noise is very low (<0.1 nS/cm),
comparable to the principal chromatographic detector. Thus, despite
a background of 25–45 μS/cm, limits of detection for
sulfide and cyanide are in the submicromolar level, with a linear
dynamic range up to 100 μM. Carbonate/bicarbonate can also be
sensitively detected. We demonstrate adaptation in a standard commercial
system. We also show that Microsoft Excel-based numerical simulations
of transport quantitatively predict the observed behavior well
Enigmatic Ion-Exchange Behavior of <i>myo</i>-Inositol Phosphates
The
separation of <i>myo</i>-inositol mono-, di-, tri-,
tetra-, pentakis-, and hexakisphosphate (InsP<sub>1</sub>, InsP<sub>2</sub>, InsP<sub>3</sub>, InsP<sub>4</sub>, InsP<sub>5</sub>, InsP<sub>6</sub>) was carried out using hydroxide eluent ion chromatography.
Acid hydrolysis of InsP<sub>6</sub> (phytate) was used to prepare
a distribution of InsPs, ranging from InsP<sub>1</sub> to InsP<sub>5</sub>’s and including unhydrolyzed InsP<sub>6</sub>. Counting
all possible positional isomers (many of which have stereoisomers
that will not be separable by conventional ion exchange), 40 chromatographically
separable peaks are possible; up to 22 were separated and identified
by mass spectrometry. InsPs show unusual ion-exchange behavior in
two respects: (a) the retention order is not monotonically related
with the charge on the ion and (b) at the same hydroxide eluent concentration,
retention is greatly dependent on the eluent metal cation. The retention
of InsP<sub>3</sub>–InsP<sub>6</sub> was determined to be controlled
by steric factors while elution was influenced by eluent cation complexation.
These highly phosphorylated InsPs have a much greater affinity for
alkali metals (Li<sup>+</sup> > Na<sup>+</sup> > K<sup>+</sup>) than
quaternary ammonium ions. This difference in cation affinity was exploited
to improve separation through the use of a tetramethylammonium hydroxide–sodium
hydroxide gradient
Flow-Cell-Induced Dispersion in Flow-through Absorbance Detection Systems: True Column Effluent Peak Variance
Following
a brief overview of the emergence of absorbance detection
in liquid chromatography, we focus on the dispersion caused by the
absorbance measurement cell and its inlet. A simple experiment is
proposed wherein chromatographic flow and conditions are held constant
but a variable portion of the column effluent is directed into the
detector. The temporal peak variance (σ<sub>t,obs</sub><sup>2</sup>), which increases as the
flow rate (<i>F</i>) through the detector decreases, is
found to be well-described as a quadratic function of <sup>1</sup>/<sub><i>F</i></sub>. This allows the extrapolation of
the results to zero residence time in the detector and thence the
determination of the true variance of the peak prior to the detector
(this includes contribution of all preceding components). This general
approach should be equally applicable to detection systems other than
absorbance. We also experiment where the inlet/outlet system remains
the same but the path length is varied. This allows one to assess
the individual contributions of the cell itself and the inlet/outlet
system.to the total observed peak. The dispersion in the cell itself
has often been modeled as a flow-independent parameter, dependent
only on the cell volume. Except for very long path/large volume cells,
this paradigm is simply incorrect