4 research outputs found
Comparison of First Accessory Cone Penetration after Using Stainless-Steel and Ni-Ti Spreaders in Curved Resin Blocks
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare first accessory gutta-percha penetration after the use of nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) or stainless-steel spreaders in curved resin blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty resin blocks with 30º and 45º curvatures (20 blocks for each) were prepared and #30 master cones were placed in canals. In part one, under 20 Newton pressure, Ni-Ti or stainless-steel spreaders were placed alongside the master cone and their penetration was measured with a millimeter ruler. In part two, after removing the spreader, one of the accessory cones (#15, #20 or MF) was substituted in the canal and its penetration was measured. The Mann-U Whitney test was used for the final evaluation. RESULTS: In both curvatures, the penetration of Ni-Ti spreaders were significantly more than stainless-steel spreaders (P<0.005). Penetration of the first accessory cones (#15 and MF) in Ni- Ti spreader group were also significantly more than stainless-steel group (P<0.05) (in both curvature groups). CONCLUSION: This study showed that Ni-Ti spreaders and #15 accessory cones penetrated deeper in curved canals than stainless spreaders and #15 accessory cones. Therefore, the use of NiTi spreader in lateral condensation technique is suggested for better results
Incidence of Dentinal Crack Formation Using ProTaper Universal and WaveOne Systems in Straight and Curved Root Canals
Introduction: This study aimed to compare dentinal micro crack formation following root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal (PTU) and WaveOne (WO) rotary systems in straight and curved root canals. Methods and Materials: One hundred mesiobuccal (MB) straight and curved canals of mandibular molars meeting inclusion criteria were divided into two control (n=10) and four experimental groups (n=20). After mounting the teeth and simulating the periodontal ligament, all the MB canals were coronally flared using Gates-Glidden drills #3 and 2 respectively. Then, in the experimental groups, the canals were instrumented with either PTU files (Sx, S1, S2, F1, F2), or Primary WO (25/0.08). Afterwards, roots were horizontally sectioned at 2, 4, and 6 mm from the apices, and evaluated under a microscope under 20× magnification. Data were analyzed with the Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The control groups showed no cracks. There was no significant difference between the two systems in the straight root canals (P>0.05). But in the curved root canals, PTU produced significantly more cracks (P<0.05) with the complete crack type which was dominant (P=0.013) compared to WO. Conclusions: This in vitro study showed that in curved root canals, instrumentation with reciprocal WO system may be safer than full rotational PTU instruments regarding crack formation.Keywords: Crack; Dentin; Instrumentation; Reciprocating; Root Canal Preparation
Comparison of Canal Preparation Pattern of K3 and ProTaper Rotary Files in Curved Resin Blocks
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare canal preparation pattern of K3 and ProTaper rotary files in curved resin blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four resin blocks were used in this experimental study and randomly divided into two groups. Their initial images were scanned. After preparation, their images were scanned again in the same position. Pre and post preparation images were superimposed by Photoshop software and the removed resin was measured in 5 different points, and then analyzed statistically by ANOVA and T-test. RESULTS: At O point (orifice), significantly (P<0.05) more outer canal wall was removed in the ProTaper group than in the K3 group. There was no significant difference at any other points of outer wall. Removed material of inner canal wall was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Under the condition of this study, both systems performed acceptable preparation pattern except at the beginning of the curve
Treatment of a Four-Rooted Maxillary Second Molar Detected with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
The significance of clinician’s knowledge about root canal anatomy and its possible variations cannot be overlooked. In some cases, taking advantage of complementary imaging techniques can help achieve a perfect flawless endodontic treatment. This article reports endodontic management of a second maxillary molar that had an uncommon anatomy of the chamber floor. After obtaining a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image, the presence of a second palatal root was confirmed. All four roots were treated and patient’s symptoms were resolved