Factors associated with using female sex work among Indian men reporting any non-regular partner in the past year in the low-HIV states, 2006.

<p>FSW = female sex worker; PR = prevalence ratio; NRP = non-regular partner. Frequencies (sample-weighted percentages) for each variable exclude missing data.</p>a<p>Unmarried model (model n = 1591) is adjusted for age and the variables shown in the upper portion of the table; married model (model n = 906) is adjusted for age, education, and the variables shown in the lower portion of the table.</p

Age-standardized prevalence of using female sex work among Indian men reporting any non-regular partner in the past year, by region and marital status, 2006.

<p>PR = prevalence ratio; FSW = female sex worker; CI = confidence interval.</p>a<p>Percentages are sample-weighted.</p>b<p>Excludes the northeastern states.</p>c<p>Total percentages and 95% CIs are sample-weighted and standardized to the age distribution of all 3423 men in the study sample reporting any non-regular partner in the past year.</p

Adjusted prevalence ratios (95% CI) for use of female sex workers (FSW) comparing men with multiple non-regular partners (NRP) to men with one NRP in the past year in 2006.

<p>CI = confidence interval. All prevalence ratios (PR) are adjusted for age and education. PR for unmarried men in the high-HIV states is also adjusted for urban residency, employment in the transport sector, having heard of STI, receiving interpersonal STI/HIV/AIDS education in the past year, genital discharge or ulcer in the past year, and consistency of condom use with NRP in the past year. PR for married men in the high-HIV states is also adjusted for urban residency, employment in the transport sector, having heard of STI, receiving interpersonal STI/HIV/AIDS education in the past year, and consistency of condom use with NRP in the past year. PR for unmarried men in the low-HIV states is also adjusted for urban residency, employment in the transport sector, genital discharge or ulcer in the past year, and consistency of condom use with NRP in the past year. PR for married men in the low-HIV states is also adjusted for employment in the transport sector, awareness of a local HIV test centre, and consistency of condom use with NRP in the past year.</p

Factors associated with using female sex work among Indian men reporting any non-regular partner in the past year in the high-HIV states, 2006.

<p>FSW = female sex worker; PR = prevalence ratio; NRP = non-regular partner; STI = sexually transmitted infection. Frequencies (sample-weighted percentages) for each variable exclude missing data.</p>a<p>Unmarried model (model n = 352) is adjusted for age and the variables shown in the upper portion of the table; married model (model n = 399) is adjusted for age, education, consistency of condom use with spouse, and the variables shown in the lower portion of the table.</p

Age-standardized prevalences of having non-regular partners and of using female sex work in the past year among Indian men, by region and marital status, 2006.

<p>PR = prevalence ratio; NRP = non-regular partner; FSW = female sex worker; CI = confidence interval.</p>a<p>Percentages are sample-weighted.</p>b<p>Excludes the northeastern states.</p>c<p>Total percentages and 95% CIs are sample-weighted and standardized to the age distribution of all 31 040 sexually active men in the study sample.</p

Estimated number of unmarried and married men in India reporting at least one female sex worker (FSW) partner in the past year in 2006.

<p>CI = confidence interval. Men from the seven northeastern states (i.e. Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim and Tripura; about 4% of the national adult male population) are excluded.</p

Trends in HIV seroprevalence among tuberculosis patients in 4 districts, 2005–6 survey and 2006–7 surveys.

<p>Trends in HIV seroprevalence among tuberculosis patients in 4 districts, 2005–6 survey and 2006–7 surveys.</p

Survey enrollment and inclusion, with reasons for non-eligibility and non-enrollment into survey.

<p>Survey enrollment and inclusion, with reasons for non-eligibility and non-enrollment into survey.</p

HIV seroprevalence among tuberculosis patients in 15 districts in India, 2006–2007.

a<p>Districts stratified by mean HIV seroprevalence in antenatal clinic (ANC) surveillance sites, 2003–2005. Low <0.5%, Medium = 0.51–1.0%, High >1.0%.</p

Districts selected for the survey.

<p>District selection stratified by mean HIV seroprevalence in antenatal clinic (ANC) surveillance sites, 2003–2005. Districts shaded blue had mean 2003–2005 ANC HIV seroprevalence 0–0.5%, yellow districts had ANC HIV seroprevalence 0.51–1.0%, and red districts had ANC HIV seroprevalence >1.0%. The districts of Davangere, Guntur, Nasik, and Tiruvanamalai were selected in the previous years' survey, and were purposively selected again for trend analysis.</p