Cytogenetics in the management of multiple myeloma: an update by the Groupe francophone de cytogénétique hématologique (GFCH).

Cytogenetics of multiple myeloma has evolved in recent years by the emergence of Interphasic fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) performed on sorted plasma cells detecting abnormalities independently of a proliferative and infiltrative index. Cytogenetic analysis plays a major part in the risk stratification of myeloma diagnosis due to prognostic impact of various cytogenetic abnormalities as well as to the association between emerging therapeutic approaches in MM. Thus, practice guidelines now recommend interphasic FISH or alternative molecular technics as the initial analysis for multiple myeloma. The Groupe francophone de cytogénétique hématologique (GFCH) proposes in this issue an update of managing multiple myeloma cytogenetics

Cytogenetics in the management of multiple Myeloma: The guidelines from the Groupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH)

International audienceMultiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by the accumulation of malignant plasma cells (PCs) in the bone marrow. Despite considerable advances in the treatment, MM is considered an incurable chronic disease with a very heterogeneous prognosis, mostly depending on genomic alterations whose complexity evolves over time. The cytogenetic analysis of MM is performed on CD138+ sorted PCs, in order to detect the following high risk cytogenetic abnormalities: t(4;14), 17p/TP53 deletion, 1q21 gain/amplification, 1p32 deletion, as well as t(11;14) because of its therapeutic implication. This minimal panel can be enlarged to detect other recurrent abnormalities, according to the prognostic score chosen by the laboratory. Although the knowledge of the genetic landscape of MM is evolving rapidly with improved molecular technologies, risk scores remain to be refined as they require more time for consensual validation. The GFCH present here the overview of genomics alterations identified in MM and related PCs diseases associated with their prognostic factor, when available, and recommendations from an expert group for identification and characterization of those alterations. This work is the update of previous 2016 recommendations

Combination of t(4;14), del(17p13), del(1p32) and 1q21 gain FISH probes identifies clonal heterogeneity and enhances the detection of adverse cytogenetic profiles in 233 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Abstract Background Our aim was to set the FISH combination of del(17p13), t(4;14), 1q21 gain and del(1p32), four adverse cytogenetic factors rarely evaluated together, and compare our technical thresholds with those defined in the literature. Methods Two hundred thirty-three patients with MM at diagnosis were studied using FISH to target 4 unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities: 17p13 deletion, t(4;14) translocation, 1p32 deletion and 1q21 gain. Technical thresholds were determined for each probe using isolated CD138-expressing PC from patients without MM. Results The FISH analysis identified abnormalities in 79.0% of patients. Del(17p13) was detected in 15.0% of cases, t(4;14) in 11.5%, 1q21 gain in 37.8% and del(1p32) in 8.7%. Adding 1p32/1q21 FISH probes has enabled us to identify adverse cytogenetic profiles in 39.0% of patients without del(17p13) or t(4;14). Clonal heterogeneity was observed in 51.1% of patients as well as an increase in the number of adverse abnormalities when related clones were greater than or equal to 2 (85.1% against 45.6%). Conclusion FISH allowed detecting accumulation of adverse abnormalities and clonal heterogeneity in MM with a combination of 4 probes. The impacts of these two parameters need to be evaluated, and could be included in future cytogenetic classifications