2 research outputs found
Effect of Vitamin C on Clinical Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: An Observational Study and Subsequent Meta-Analysis
Background: Whether vitamin C provides any benefit when administered in
critically ill patients, including those with coronavirus disease
(COVID-19), is controversial. We endeavored to estimate the effect of
administration of vitamin C on clinical outcomes of critically ill
patients with COVID-19 by performing an observational study and
subsequent meta-analysis.& nbsp;Methods: Firstly, we conducted an
observational study of critically ill patients with laboratory-confirmed
COVID-19 who consecutively underwent invasive mechanical ventilation in
an academic intensive care unit (ICU) during the second pandemic wave.
We compared all-cause mortality of patients receiving vitamin C (
“vitamin C “ group) or not ( “control “ group) on top of
standard-of-care. Subsequently, we systematically searched PubMed and
CENTRAL for relevant studies, which reported on all-cause mortality
(primary outcome) and/or morbidity of critically ill patients with
COVID-19 receiving vitamin C or not treatment. Pooled risk ratio (RR)
and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random
effects model. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO.&
nbsp;Results: In the observational study, baseline characteristics were
comparable between the two groups. Mortality was 20.0% (2/10) in the
vitamin C group vs. 47.6% (49/103; p = 0.11) in the control group.
Subsequently, the meta-analysis included 11 studies (6 observational;
five randomized controlled trials) enrolling 1,807 critically ill
patients with COVID-19. Mortality of patients receiving vitamin C on top
of standard-of-care was not lower than patients receiving
standard-of-care alone (25.8 vs. 34.7%; RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.57-1.26; p =
0.42).& nbsp;Conclusions: After combining results of our observational
cohort with those of relevant studies into a meta-analysis of data from
1,807 patients, we found that administration vitamin C as opposed to
standard-of-care alone might not be associated with lower of mortality
among critically ill patients with COVID-19. Additional evidence is
anticipated from relevant large randomized controlled trials which are
currently underway.& nbsp;Systematic Review
Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,
identifier:CRD4202127665
Does Route of Full Feeding Affect Outcome among Ventilated Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Observational Study
The outbreak of the new coronavirus strain SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) highlighted the need for appropriate feeding practices among critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to describe feeding practices of intubated COVID-19 patients during their second week of hospitalization in the First Department of Critical Care Medicine, Evaggelismos General Hospital, and evaluate potential associations with all cause 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. We enrolled adult intubated COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU between September 2020 and July 2021 and prospectively monitored until their hospital discharge. Of the 162 patients analyzed (52.8% men, 51.6% overweight/obese, mean age 63.2 ± 11.9 years), 27.2% of patients used parenteral nutrition, while the rest were fed enterally. By 30 days, 34.2% of the patients in the parenteral group had died compared to 32.7% of the patients in the enteral group (relative risk (RR) for the group receiving enteral nutrition = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.88–1.06, p = 0.120). Those in the enteral group demonstrated a lower duration of hospital stay (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85-0.97, p = 0.036) as well as mechanical ventilation support (RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89–0.99, p = 0.043). Enteral feeding during second week of ICU hospitalization may be associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization and stay in mechanical ventilation support among critically ill intubated patients with COVID-19