A low cost gas phase analysis system for the diagnosis of bacterial infection

Drug resistance is becoming a major concern in both the western world and in developing countries. The over use of common anti-bacterial drugs has resulted in a plethora of multi-drug resistant diseases and an ever reducing number of effective treatments - and is now of major concern to the UK government. One of the major reasons behind this is the difficulty in identifying bacterial infections from viral infections, especially in primary care where patients have an expectation of receiving medication. For most viral conditions, there is no effective treatment and the body fights off the disease, thus prescribing anti-bacterial drugs simply results in the proliferation of drugs within the community - increasing the rate of drug resistance. Increasing drug resistance contributed to the rise of superbugs (drug resistant bacteria) which are expected to kill an about 10 million people a year worldwide by the year 2050 and could result to an economic loss of $63 trillion. Increasing drug resistance contributed to the rise of superbugs (drug resistant bacteria) which are expected to kill an about 10 million people a year worldwide by the year 2050 and could result to an economic loss of$63 trillion. Therefore, there is a strong medical and economic need to develop tools that can diagnose bacterial diseases from viral infections, focused towards primary care. One means of achieving this is through the detection of gas-phase biomarkers IX of disease. It is well known that the metabolic activity of bacteria is significantly different from its host. Many studies have shown that it is possible to detect a bacterial infection, identify the strain and its current life-cycle stage simply by measuring bacterial metabolic emissions. In addition, the human body's response to a bacterial infection is significantly different from a viral infection the human body's response to a bacterial infection is significantly different from a viral infection, allowing human stress markers to also be used for differentiating these conditions. Thus, there is evidence that these bio-markers exist and could be detected. However, a major limiting factor inhibiting the wide-spread deployment of this concept is the unit cost of the analytical instrumentation required for gas analysis. Currently, the main preferred methods are GCMS (gas chromatography/mass spectrometry), TOF-MS (time of flight - MS) and SIFT-MS (selective ion flow tube - MS). Though excellent at undertaking this role, the typical unit cost of these instruments is in excess of $100k, making them out of reach of current GP budgets. Therefore, what is required is a low-cost, portable instrument that can detect bacterial infections from viral infections and be applicable to primary care

A novel, low-cost, portable PID sensor for detection of VOC

A low cost portable photoionization (PID) sensor was successfully designed and manufactured. Unlike existing commercial PID sensors, our device provides two outputs, one associated with the total chemical components and a second that provides some level of compositional information. We believe that this makes this sensor system more useful than a standard PID, with a similar, if not lower, cost point. Our PID sensor was tested with gas concentrations down to 2 ppm isobutylene. These results indicate that the limit of detection will be well below 1 ppm. Further detection tests were carried out with ethanol, acetone and isobutylene, which showed similar sensitivities. Compositional measurements were also undertaken and the results presented shows our sensor can discriminate successfully between low concentration isobutylene and 2-pentanone

A novel, low-cost, portable PID sensor for the detection of volatile organic compounds

We report on the design, fabrication and verification of a portable, low cost PID. Unlike commercial PID sensors, ours provides two outputs. One output correlates to the total chemical components and a second that provides some level of compositional information. We believe that this makes this sensor system more useful than a standard commercial PID, at a similar cost point. Our PID sensor was tested with gas concentrations down to 2 ppm isobutylene. The results presented indicate that the limit of detection will be well below 1 ppm. Compositional analysis was also carried out and the results presented shows our sensor can successfully discriminate between low concentrations of 2-hexanone, isobutylene, propanol, 2-pentanone, 2-octanone and 2-heptanone

Development of a tuneable NDIR optical electronic nose

Electronic nose (E-nose) technology provides an easy and inexpensive way to analyse chemical samples. In recent years, there has been increasing demand for E-noses in applications such as food safety, environmental monitoring and medical diagnostics. Currently, the majority of E-noses utilise an array of metal oxide (MOX) or conducting polymer (CP) gas sensors. However, these sensing technologies can suffer from sensor drift, poor repeatability and temperature and humidity effects. Optical gas sensors have the potential to overcome these issues. This paper reports on the development of an optical non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) E-nose, which consists of an array of four tuneable detectors, able to scan a range of wavelengths (3.1−10.5 μm). The functionality of the device was demonstrated in a series of experiments, involving gas rig tests for individual chemicals (CO2 and CH4), at different concentrations, and discriminating between chemical standards and complex mixtures. The optical gas sensor responses were shown to be linear to polynomial for different concentrations of CO2 and CH4. Good discrimination was achieved between sample groups. Optical E-nose technology therefore demonstrates significant potential as a portable and low-cost solution for a number of E-nose applications

Fused deposition modelling for the fabrication of metal oxide based gas sensor

Fused Deposition Modelling technology was used to fabricate a working gas sensor to detect VOCs. The sensors were fabricated by incorporating metal oxide-based material, specifically tungsten oxide, with polycaprolactone. The mixture was made into pellets and extruded using a filament extruder. The best combination was found to be at 85% WO3 in WO3−PCL mixture. A modified FDM printer was used to print the gas sensitive material onto a sensor substrate made of alumina. The gas testing results demonstrated that the sensors could detect 100 ppm isobutylene and ethanol at up to 5 ppb