3 research outputs found

    Impact criteria for assigning alien species to different categories in the classification scheme (Box 2).

    No full text
    <p>These categories are for species that have been evaluated, have alien populations (i.e., are known to have been introduced outside their native range), and for which there is adequate data to allow classification (see <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850#pbio-1001850-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2</a>). Classification follows the general principle outlined in the first row. However, we specifically outlined the different mechanisms through which an alien species can cause impacts in order to help assessors to look at the different aspects and to identify potential research gaps. Numbers next to different impact classes reference the numbering of impacts in the classification of impact mechanisms in the GISD (<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850#pbio-1001850-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a>).</p

    Impact scheme of the Global Invasive Species Database, implemented by the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) Invasive Species Specialist Group.

    No full text
    <p>The GISD stores detailed information on more than 800 invasive alien species, including on the impacts they cause. The GISD has recently been redesigned, and all information has been re-classified in order to improve the searching functionalities of the database. The schema developed for the revised GISD has allowed all species stored in the database to be coded in respect of the direct mechanisms by which their impacts occur (e.g., predation), and by the outcomes of those impact mechanisms on the environment or on human activities. For example, the grass <i>Imperata cylindrica</i> (Poales: Poaceae) almost doubles litter biomass in invaded locations, which increases potential fuel for fires (impact mechanism coded as flammability, and impact outcome as modification of fire regime). The plant <i>Schinus terebinthifolius</i> (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae) is a bio-fouling agent, forming dense thickets in gullies and river bottoms, with the ultimate effect of changing the hydrology of river streams of invaded freshwater bodies (mechanism coded as bio-fouling, and impact outcome described as modification of hydrology). The insect <i>Adelges piceae</i> (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) releases a toxin causing stress to trees, which eventually die. The impact outcome of <i>A. piceae</i> is described in GISD as damage to forestry, with its mechanism of impact coded as poisoning/toxicity, but it can also be coded as having an environmental impact on plant/animal health, as it has been here. In the table, mechanisms and outcomes are reported in two separate columns, and the three examples of the connections between mechanisms and outcomes are shown. Impact outcomes in the GISD database can be environmental or socio-economic, but our categorisation scheme of species in terms of the magnitudes of their impacts (<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850#pbio-1001850-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2</a>; <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850#pbio-1001850-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>) concerns only the former.</p
    corecore