18 research outputs found

    Re-evaluation of the significance of penicillin binding protein 3 in the susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes to β-lactam antibiotics

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Penicillin binding protein 3 (PBP3) of <it>L. monocytogenes </it>has long been thought of as the primary lethal target for β-lactam antibiotics due to the excellent correlation between the MICs of different β-lactams and their affinity for this protein. The gene encoding PBP3 has not yet been directly identified in this gram-positive bacterium, but based on <it>in silico </it>analysis, this protein is likely to be encoded by <it>lmo1438</it>. However, studies examining the effects of mutations in genes encoding known and putative <it>L. monocytogenes </it>PBPs have demonstrated that inactivation of <it>lmo1438 </it>does not affect sensitivity to β-lactams.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this study, overexpression of <it>lmo1438 </it>was achieved using an inducible (nisin-controlled) expression system. This permitted the direct demonstration that <it>lmo1438 </it>encodes PBP3. PBP3 overexpression was accompanied by slightly elevated PBP4 expression. The recombinant strain overexpressing PBP3 displayed significant growth retardation and greatly reduced cell length in the stationary phase of growth in culture. In antibiotic susceptibility assays, the strain overexpressing PBP3 displayed increased sensitivity to subinhibitory concentrations of several β-lactams and decreased survival in the presence of a lethal dose of penicillin G. However, the MIC values of the tested β-lactams for this recombinant strain were unchanged compared to the parent strain.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The present study allows a reevaluation of the importance of PBP3 in the susceptibility of <it>L. monocytogenes </it>to β-lactams. It is clear that PBP3 is not the primary lethal target for β-lactams, since neither the absence nor an excess of this protein affect the susceptibility of <it>L. monocytogenes </it>to these antibiotics. The elevated level of PBP4 expression observed in the recombinant strain overexpressing PBP3 demonstrates that the composition of the <it>L. monocytogenes </it>cell wall is subject to tight regulation. The observed changes in the morphology of stationary phase cells in response to PBP3 overexpression suggests the involvement of this protein in cell division during this phase of growth.</p

    Critical Role of a Ferritin-Like Protein in the Control of <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> Cell Envelope Structure and Stability under β-lactam Pressure

    Get PDF
    <div><p>The human pathogen <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> is susceptible to the β-lactam antibiotics penicillin G and ampicillin, and these are the drugs of choice for the treatment of listerial infections. However, these antibiotics exert only a bacteriostatic effect on this bacterium and consequently, <i>L. monocytogenes</i> is regarded as β-lactam tolerant. It is widely accepted that the phenomenon of bacterial tolerance to β-lactams is due to the lack of adequate autolysin activity, but the mechanisms of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> tolerance to this class of antibiotics are poorly characterized. A ferritin-like protein (Fri) was recently identified as a mediator of β-lactam tolerance in <i>L. monocytogenes</i>, but its function in this process remains unknown. The present study was undertaken to improve our understanding of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> tolerance to β-lactams and to characterize the role of Fri in this phenomenon. A comparative physiological analysis of wild-type <i>L. monocytogenes</i> and a <i>fri</i> deletion mutant provided evidence of a multilevel mechanism controlling autolysin activity in cells grown under β-lactam pressure, which leads to a reduction in the level and/or activity of cell wall-associated autolysins. This is accompanied by increases in the amount of teichoic acids, cell wall thickness and cell envelope integrity of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> grown in the presence of penicillin G, and provides the basis for the innate β-lactam tolerance of this bacterium. Furthermore, this study revealed the inability of the <i>L. monocytogenes</i><i>Δ</i><i>fri</i> mutant to deplete autolysins from the cell wall, to adjust the content of teichoic acids and to maintain their D-alanylation at the correct level when treated with penicillin G, thus providing further evidence that Fri is involved in the control of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> cell envelope structure and stability under β-lactam pressure.</p></div

    Cell wall TA content in <i>L. monocytogenes</i> strains.

    No full text
    a<p>The results are the average of three independent experiments, each performed with separate cell wall preparations of the strains grown in the presence (+ PenG) or absence of 0.09 µg/ml penicillin G ± the standard deviation (SD).</p>b<p>Significant differences following growth in the presence and absence of penicillin G (Student's t-test; P<0.05).</p>c<p>Significant differences between the studied strains (Student's t-test; P<0.05).</p

    Expression of promoter-<i>lacZ</i> fusions in <i>L. monocytogenes</i> strains.

    No full text
    a<p>The expression of promoter-<i>lacZ</i> fusions in response to the addition of 0.09 µg/ml penicillin G (+ PenG) or in the absence of the antibiotic was determined by β-galactosidase assays. Specific β-galactosidase activity was measured for wild-type (EGD) or Δ<i>fri</i> mutant cells containing promoter-<i>lacZ</i> fusions, grown in the presence or absence of the antibiotic. The results are the average of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate ± standard deviation.</p>b<p>Genes that are organized in an operon (according to Toledo-Arana et al. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0077808#pone.0077808-ToledoArana1" target="_blank">[66]</a>).</p>c<p>Significant differences following growth in the presence and absence of penicillin G (Student's t-test; P<0.05).</p>d<p>Significant differences between the studied strains (Student's t-test; P<0.05).</p

    Content of murein hydrolases in various cellular compartments of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> strains.

    No full text
    <p>Zymography analysis of proteins from the cytoplasm (A), cytoplasmic membrane (B), cell wall fraction (C) and culture supernatant (D) were performed for the wild-type EGD strain grown without (<i>Lm</i> EGD) and with (<i>Lm</i> EGD + penG) penicillin G, and the <i>Δ</i><i>fri</i> mutant strain grown without (<i>Lm</i> Δ<i>fri</i>) and with (<i>Lm</i> Δ<i>fri</i> + penG) the same antibiotic. Equivalent quantities of proteins isolated from each fraction were subjected to zymographic analysis in SDS-polyacrylamide gels. MWM – prestained Protein Molecular Weight Marker. The relative amounts of murein hydrolases estimated on the basis of the densitometric analysis are shown in the lower panel. Values in each analyzed compartment were normalized to the total intensity of murein hydrolases from the wild-type EGD strain grown without the antibiotic, which was assigned the value of 100%. The presented results are mean values from the analysis of three independent protein isolations ± the standard deviation. <i><sup>a</sup></i> Significant differences following growth in the presence and absence of penicillin G (Student's t-test; P<0.05). <i><sup>b</sup></i> Significant differences between the studied strains (Student's t-test; P<0.05).</p

    Integrity of the cell wall of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> strains.

    No full text
    <p>Cells of the wild-type (<i>Lm</i> EGD) and <i>Δ</i><i>fri</i> mutant (<i>Lm </i><i>Δ</i><i>fri</i>) strains grown in the absence or presence of penicillin G (+penG) were incubated with lysozyme (10 U/ml) at 37°C for 90 min. At selected intervals, the OD<sub>600</sub> of the cell suspensions was determined. Error bars represent the standard deviation from three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate.</p

    RNA-Targeting CRISPR–Cas Systems and Their Applications

    No full text
    Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)&ndash;CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems have revolutionized modern molecular biology. Numerous types of these systems have been discovered to date. Many CRISPR&ndash;Cas systems have been used as a backbone for the development of potent research tools, with Cas9 being the most widespread. While most of the utilized systems are DNA-targeting, recently more and more attention is being gained by those that target RNA. Their ability to specifically recognize a given RNA sequence in an easily programmable way makes them ideal candidates for developing new research tools. In this review we summarize current knowledge on CRISPR&ndash;Cas systems which have been shown to target RNA molecules, that is type III (Csm/Cmr), type VI (Cas13), and type II (Cas9). We also present a list of available technologies based on these systems

    Cell morphology of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> strains.

    No full text
    <p>Scanning electron micrographs (A) and transmission electron micrographs (B) of wild-type (<i>Lm</i> EGD) and <i>Δ</i><i>fri</i> mutant (<i>Lm </i><i>Δ</i><i>fri</i>) cells grown in the absence or presence of penicillin G (+penG). Bars indicate 2 µm in the scanning electron micrographs and 200 nm in the transmission electron micrographs. The presented micrographs are representative of two independent sample preparations.</p

    Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

    No full text
    a<p>The sequence in boldface type is the EcoRI restriction enzyme site.</p>b<p>The sequence in boldface type is the BamHI restriction enzyme site.</p>c<p>The sequence in boldface type is the SmaI restriction enzyme site.</p

    Cell length and cell wall thickness of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> strains.

    No full text
    a<p>Mean cell lengths were determined by measuring 100 cells of each strain grown in the presence (+ PenG) or absence of 0.09 µg/ml penicillin G. The analysis was performed using two independently prepared samples. From each independent sample, equal numbers of cells were analyzed ± standard deviation (SD).</p>b<p>Mean cell wall thickness was determined by measurement of 20 cells of each strain grown in the presence (+ PenG) or absence of 0.09 µg/ml penicillin G. The analysis was performed using two independently prepared samples. From each independent sample, equal numbers of cells were analyzed ± standard deviation (SD).</p>c<p>Significant differences following growth in the presence and absence of penicillin G (Student's t-test; P<0.05).</p>d<p>Significant differences between the studied strains (Student's t-test; P<0.05).</p
    corecore