Predicting and controlling the reactivity of immune cell populations against cancer

Heterogeneous cell populations form an interconnected network that determine their collective output. One example of such a heterogeneous immune population is tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), whose output can be measured in terms of its reactivity against tumors. While the degree of reactivity varies considerably between different TILs, ranging from null to a potent response, the underlying network that governs the reactivity is poorly understood. Here, we asked whether one can predict and even control this reactivity. To address this we measured the subpopulation compositions of 91 TILs surgically removed from 27 metastatic melanoma patients. Despite the large number of subpopulations compositions, we were able to computationally extract a simple set of subpopulation-based rules that accurately predict the degree of reactivity. This raised the conjecture of whether one could control reactivity of TILs by manipulating their subpopulation composition. Remarkably, by rationally enriching and depleting selected subsets of subpopulations, we were able to restore anti-tumor reactivity to nonreactive TILs. Altogether, this work describes a general framework for predicting and controlling the output of a cell mixture

Presentation_3_Impact of cryopreservation on CAR T production and clinical response.pptx

Adoptive cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has become an efficient treatment option for patients with hematological malignancies. FDA approved CAR T products are manufactured in centralized facilities from fresh or frozen leukapheresis and the cryopreserved CAR T infusion product is shipped back to the patient. An increasing number of clinical centers produce CAR T cells on-site, which enables the use of fresh and cryopreserved PBMCs and CAR T cells. Here we determined the effect of cryopreservation on PBMCs and CD19 CAR T cells in a cohort of 118 patients treated with fresh CAR T cells and in several patients head-to-head. Cryopreserved PBMCs, obtained from leukapheresis products, contained less erythrocytes and T cells, but were sufficient to produce CAR T cells for therapy. There was no correlation between the recovery of PBMCs and the transduction efficacy, the number of CAR T cells obtained by the end of the manufacturing process, the in vitro reactivity, or the response rate to CAR T therapy. We could show that CAR T cells cryopreserved during the manufacturing process, stored and resumed expansion at a later time point, yielded sufficient cell numbers for treatment and led to complete remissions. Phenotype analysis including T cell subtypes, chemokine receptor and co-inhibitory/stimulatory molecules, revealed that fresh CAR T cells expressed significantly more TIM-3 and contained less effector T cells in comparison to their frozen counterparts. In addition, fresh CAR T infusion products demonstrated increased in vitro anti-tumor reactivity, however cryopreserved CAR T cells still showed high anti-tumor potency and specificity. The recovery of cryopreserved CAR T cells was similar in responding and non-responding patients. Although fresh CAR T infusion products exhibit higher anti-tumor reactivity, the use of frozen PBMCs as staring material and frozen CAR T infusion products seems a viable option, as frozen products still exhibit high in vitro potency and cryopreservation did not seem to affect the clinical outcome.</p

Table_1_Impact of cryopreservation on CAR T production and clinical response.docx

Adoptive cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has become an efficient treatment option for patients with hematological malignancies. FDA approved CAR T products are manufactured in centralized facilities from fresh or frozen leukapheresis and the cryopreserved CAR T infusion product is shipped back to the patient. An increasing number of clinical centers produce CAR T cells on-site, which enables the use of fresh and cryopreserved PBMCs and CAR T cells. Here we determined the effect of cryopreservation on PBMCs and CD19 CAR T cells in a cohort of 118 patients treated with fresh CAR T cells and in several patients head-to-head. Cryopreserved PBMCs, obtained from leukapheresis products, contained less erythrocytes and T cells, but were sufficient to produce CAR T cells for therapy. There was no correlation between the recovery of PBMCs and the transduction efficacy, the number of CAR T cells obtained by the end of the manufacturing process, the in vitro reactivity, or the response rate to CAR T therapy. We could show that CAR T cells cryopreserved during the manufacturing process, stored and resumed expansion at a later time point, yielded sufficient cell numbers for treatment and led to complete remissions. Phenotype analysis including T cell subtypes, chemokine receptor and co-inhibitory/stimulatory molecules, revealed that fresh CAR T cells expressed significantly more TIM-3 and contained less effector T cells in comparison to their frozen counterparts. In addition, fresh CAR T infusion products demonstrated increased in vitro anti-tumor reactivity, however cryopreserved CAR T cells still showed high anti-tumor potency and specificity. The recovery of cryopreserved CAR T cells was similar in responding and non-responding patients. Although fresh CAR T infusion products exhibit higher anti-tumor reactivity, the use of frozen PBMCs as staring material and frozen CAR T infusion products seems a viable option, as frozen products still exhibit high in vitro potency and cryopreservation did not seem to affect the clinical outcome.</p

Table_2_Impact of cryopreservation on CAR T production and clinical response.docx

Adoptive cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has become an efficient treatment option for patients with hematological malignancies. FDA approved CAR T products are manufactured in centralized facilities from fresh or frozen leukapheresis and the cryopreserved CAR T infusion product is shipped back to the patient. An increasing number of clinical centers produce CAR T cells on-site, which enables the use of fresh and cryopreserved PBMCs and CAR T cells. Here we determined the effect of cryopreservation on PBMCs and CD19 CAR T cells in a cohort of 118 patients treated with fresh CAR T cells and in several patients head-to-head. Cryopreserved PBMCs, obtained from leukapheresis products, contained less erythrocytes and T cells, but were sufficient to produce CAR T cells for therapy. There was no correlation between the recovery of PBMCs and the transduction efficacy, the number of CAR T cells obtained by the end of the manufacturing process, the in vitro reactivity, or the response rate to CAR T therapy. We could show that CAR T cells cryopreserved during the manufacturing process, stored and resumed expansion at a later time point, yielded sufficient cell numbers for treatment and led to complete remissions. Phenotype analysis including T cell subtypes, chemokine receptor and co-inhibitory/stimulatory molecules, revealed that fresh CAR T cells expressed significantly more TIM-3 and contained less effector T cells in comparison to their frozen counterparts. In addition, fresh CAR T infusion products demonstrated increased in vitro anti-tumor reactivity, however cryopreserved CAR T cells still showed high anti-tumor potency and specificity. The recovery of cryopreserved CAR T cells was similar in responding and non-responding patients. Although fresh CAR T infusion products exhibit higher anti-tumor reactivity, the use of frozen PBMCs as staring material and frozen CAR T infusion products seems a viable option, as frozen products still exhibit high in vitro potency and cryopreservation did not seem to affect the clinical outcome.</p

Presentation_1_Impact of cryopreservation on CAR T production and clinical response.pptx

Adoptive cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has become an efficient treatment option for patients with hematological malignancies. FDA approved CAR T products are manufactured in centralized facilities from fresh or frozen leukapheresis and the cryopreserved CAR T infusion product is shipped back to the patient. An increasing number of clinical centers produce CAR T cells on-site, which enables the use of fresh and cryopreserved PBMCs and CAR T cells. Here we determined the effect of cryopreservation on PBMCs and CD19 CAR T cells in a cohort of 118 patients treated with fresh CAR T cells and in several patients head-to-head. Cryopreserved PBMCs, obtained from leukapheresis products, contained less erythrocytes and T cells, but were sufficient to produce CAR T cells for therapy. There was no correlation between the recovery of PBMCs and the transduction efficacy, the number of CAR T cells obtained by the end of the manufacturing process, the in vitro reactivity, or the response rate to CAR T therapy. We could show that CAR T cells cryopreserved during the manufacturing process, stored and resumed expansion at a later time point, yielded sufficient cell numbers for treatment and led to complete remissions. Phenotype analysis including T cell subtypes, chemokine receptor and co-inhibitory/stimulatory molecules, revealed that fresh CAR T cells expressed significantly more TIM-3 and contained less effector T cells in comparison to their frozen counterparts. In addition, fresh CAR T infusion products demonstrated increased in vitro anti-tumor reactivity, however cryopreserved CAR T cells still showed high anti-tumor potency and specificity. The recovery of cryopreserved CAR T cells was similar in responding and non-responding patients. Although fresh CAR T infusion products exhibit higher anti-tumor reactivity, the use of frozen PBMCs as staring material and frozen CAR T infusion products seems a viable option, as frozen products still exhibit high in vitro potency and cryopreservation did not seem to affect the clinical outcome.</p

Presentation_2_Impact of cryopreservation on CAR T production and clinical response.pptx

Adoptive cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has become an efficient treatment option for patients with hematological malignancies. FDA approved CAR T products are manufactured in centralized facilities from fresh or frozen leukapheresis and the cryopreserved CAR T infusion product is shipped back to the patient. An increasing number of clinical centers produce CAR T cells on-site, which enables the use of fresh and cryopreserved PBMCs and CAR T cells. Here we determined the effect of cryopreservation on PBMCs and CD19 CAR T cells in a cohort of 118 patients treated with fresh CAR T cells and in several patients head-to-head. Cryopreserved PBMCs, obtained from leukapheresis products, contained less erythrocytes and T cells, but were sufficient to produce CAR T cells for therapy. There was no correlation between the recovery of PBMCs and the transduction efficacy, the number of CAR T cells obtained by the end of the manufacturing process, the in vitro reactivity, or the response rate to CAR T therapy. We could show that CAR T cells cryopreserved during the manufacturing process, stored and resumed expansion at a later time point, yielded sufficient cell numbers for treatment and led to complete remissions. Phenotype analysis including T cell subtypes, chemokine receptor and co-inhibitory/stimulatory molecules, revealed that fresh CAR T cells expressed significantly more TIM-3 and contained less effector T cells in comparison to their frozen counterparts. In addition, fresh CAR T infusion products demonstrated increased in vitro anti-tumor reactivity, however cryopreserved CAR T cells still showed high anti-tumor potency and specificity. The recovery of cryopreserved CAR T cells was similar in responding and non-responding patients. Although fresh CAR T infusion products exhibit higher anti-tumor reactivity, the use of frozen PBMCs as staring material and frozen CAR T infusion products seems a viable option, as frozen products still exhibit high in vitro potency and cryopreservation did not seem to affect the clinical outcome.</p

Characterization of vessel with PAS-CD31 dual staining (endothelial or vessel like channels – VM) in paraffin sections of melanoma patients.

<p>(A) PAS-positive VM channels with no endothelial marker CD31 staining, black arrows indicate VM channels; (B) PAS-negative patterns and CD31-positive staining; red arrows indicate endothelial channels; (C) PAS-positive and CD31-positive channels; (D) a summary of microscopic vessels observed. Microscopic evaluation was done blindly by two pathologists. The data represents average values as seen in 10 high power fields per sample.</p