21 research outputs found

    Reported symptoms and medical consumption.

    No full text
    <p>CHIK+, persons with a history of CHIKV infection confirmed by serology (n = 199); CHIK–, persons confirmed as seronegative for CHIKV (n = 199); RR, relative risks; CI, confidence interval.</p>*<p>RR, relative risks controlling for stratification criteria.</p>†<p>Exact Mac Nemar test.</p

    Percentage of patients (n = 199) fully recovered, shown by age group.

    No full text
    <p>The long dash followed by the short dash represents patients aged under 30; the dash represents patients aged 30 to 59 and the solid line represents those aged 60 and over. Recovery is fast in young subjects.</p

    Estimating Chikungunya prevalence in La RĂ©union Island outbreak by serosurveys: Two methods for two critical times of the epidemic-1

    No full text
    On-based SEROCHIK survey (right scale). For the serosurvey, both self-reports (all subjects who have declared that they have been infected, without taking into account serology results) and confirmed self-reports (with a positive serology) are noted. We refer to the date of first clinical signs declared by the subjects during the survey conducted between August 172006 and October 202006. "Suspected cases" are defined as cases with a sudden onset of fever with temperature > 38.5°C and incapacitating arthralgia.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Estimating Chikungunya prevalence in La Réunion Island outbreak by serosurveys: Two methods for two critical times of the epidemic"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/8/99</p><p>BMC Infectious Diseases 2008;8():99-99.</p><p>Published online 28 Jul 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2528011.</p><p></p

    Estimating Chikungunya prevalence in La RĂ©union Island outbreak by serosurveys: Two methods for two critical times of the epidemic-0

    No full text
    On-based SEROCHIK survey (right scale). For the serosurvey, both self-reports (all subjects who have declared that they have been infected, without taking into account serology results) and confirmed self-reports (with a positive serology) are noted. We refer to the date of first clinical signs declared by the subjects during the survey conducted between August 172006 and October 202006. "Suspected cases" are defined as cases with a sudden onset of fever with temperature > 38.5°C and incapacitating arthralgia.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Estimating Chikungunya prevalence in La Réunion Island outbreak by serosurveys: Two methods for two critical times of the epidemic"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/8/99</p><p>BMC Infectious Diseases 2008;8():99-99.</p><p>Published online 28 Jul 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2528011.</p><p></p

    Quality of life assessment by the SF-12 of subjects with a history of Chikungunya virus infection compared with uninfected subjects.

    No full text
    <p>CHIK+, persons with a history of CHIKV infection confirmed by serology (n = 162); CHIK–, persons confirmed as seronegative for CHIKV (n = 162).</p>*<p>Wilcoxon's rank test for paired samples.</p>†<p>After Bonferroni correction, the statistical significance was then set at p = 0.01 with a bilateral formulation.</p
    corecore