Adherence and effectiveness of an emotion-based psychodynamic online self-help during and after inpatient and day-care psychotherapy: Results of a naturalistic study

BackgroundInternet-based mental health interventions are considered effective in providing low-threshold support for people with mental health disorders. However, there is a lack of research investigating the transferability of such online programs into routine care settings. Low treatment adherence and problems with technical implementation often limit a successful transfer into clinical routines. This naturalistic study aims to identify influencing factors on program adherence in patients who participated in an online intervention during inpatient or day-clinic psychotherapeutic treatment.Methods and findingsIn a naturalistic study, we investigated the transferability of the transdiagnostic psychodynamic online self-help program KEN-Online, which includes eight consecutive units. Between May 2017 and October 2018, patients who received inpatient or day-clinic psychotherapeutic treatment at the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy in the University Medical Center Mainz have been offered to use KEN-Online. Of the n = 749 patients who were admitted to the clinic, n = 239 patients (32%) registered for participation in KEN-Online. While 46.9% of the participants did not complete any unit (inactive participants), 53.1% completed at least the first unit (active participants). Age, number of diagnoses, and symptom severity were associated with (in)active participation. Adherence decreased over time resulting in only 17 participants (7.6%) who completed all units. None of the sociodemographic and medical characteristics proved to be significant predictors of adherence. Analyses of effectiveness showed a significant reduction of anxiety and depression in active participants in the course of participation, with higher improvements in participants that completed more than half of the units.ConclusionAdherence to the online self-help program KEN-Online was lower in the naturalistic setting than in a previous clinical trial, but was still associated with greater program effectiveness. Adherence-promoting measures are crucial to increase the effectiveness of such interventions in clinical settings

Development and evaluation of an internet- and mobile-based intervention for individualized return to work planning after inpatient rehabilitation : study protocol for a randomized-controlled-trial

Background: Following discharge, it is crucial for patients to transfer intentions and action plans from inpatient rehabilitation into everyday life. This ensures their reintegration into social and working life and prevents economic costs due to sick leave or reduced earning capacity pension. However, most established aftercare programs do not specifically address occupational problems or challenges during occupational measures such as graded return to work. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the low-threshold online self-help intervention marena (Meine Arbeitsbezogene Reha-Nachsorge - My Work-related Rehabilitation Aftercare) to support return to work. Methods: A two-arm randomized-controlled-trial (RCT) will be conducted. A total of N = 400 rehabilitation inpatients across different indication areas (psychosomatic, orthopedic, or cardiologic) aged 18 to 65 years with a planned return to work after medical rehabilitation, have a heightened social-medical risk and private internet access and are insured with the German Pension insurance or statutory health insurance, will be recruited in four medical and psychosomatic clinics in Germany. Participants will be allocated to either the intervention (IG) or the control group (CG). In a stepped-care model, participants of the IG will receive access to the non-guided internet- and mobile-based intervention marena (IG subgroup 1) or marena in combination with GSA-Online plus (IG subgroup 2), a guided psychodynamic internet-based intervention that has proven effective in two trials regarding occupational and health objectives. Based on a priori defined indication criteria, clinic staff will recommend either IG subgroup 1 or IG subgroup 2. The CG will receive optimized treatment as usual with access to a survey feature within marena. The primary outcome will be work status after 6 months (T2) and 12 months (T4). The endpoint at 12 months (T4) after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation will be considered as secondary endpoint. Work status is defined as positive if the participant is working and has ≤ 6 weeks of sick leave at T2 and ≤ 12 weeks of sick leave at T4. Secondary outcomes include successful completion of graded return to work, successful application for benefits for participation in working life, current work ability, social-medical risk, subjective prognosis of future employment, quality of life, somatic symptoms, coping, social support, depression, anxiety, and psychosocial stress. Discussion: This study will contribute to the evidence concerning efficacy of online aftercare interventions. If proven efficacious, marena could provide an individualized and adaptable self-help approach to promote return to work following inpatient rehabilitation