22 research outputs found

    Nonprofessional Healthcare Staff Perceptions Regarding Inmate Self-Injury in Georgia

    Get PDF
    Self-injury in correctional facilities is an increasing problem. Healthcare staff are tasked with responding to and treating self-injurious inmates. Research concerning the perceptions of prison self-injury depended on the experiences of professional healthcare staff and showed that specialized training reduced anxiety and altered perceptions. The perceptions of nonprofessional healthcare staff regarding inmate self-injury have not been studied. The purpose of this research was to understand the perceptions of inmate self-injury maintained by untrained healthcare staff through evaluation of their expressed experiences with self-injuring inmates. The research was based on the humanistic nursing theory. A phenomenological approach guided interviews of 8 healthcare staff having direct contact with inmates who self-injure. Participants had a past or present employment status with a State of Georgia Department of Corrections North Region correctional facility. Data were reviewed and coded to best reflect what it means to be a nonprofessionally trained healthcare member responding to inmate self-injury. Nonprofessional healthcare staff perceived that various experiences affected their level of ease and certainty, they operated as preservers of life and active listeners, felt that other healthcare staff held negative opinions, and were very helpful and supporting. Staff perceived that challenges prevented their success in managing self-injury. Last, nonprofessional staff perceived themselves as very helpful and therapeutic. This study promotes social change by encouraging staff to share knowledge, experience, and practical help with each other while building cohesive and collaborative relationships

    Diversity in donorship: the changing landscape of official humanitarian aid

    Get PDF

    The QuinteT Recruitment Intervention supported five randomized trials to recruit to target: a mixed-methods evaluation

    Get PDF
    ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI) on recruitment in challenging randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have applied the intervention. The QRI aims to understand recruitment difficulties, and then implements ‘QRI-actions’ to address these as recruitment proceeds.Study Design and SettingA mixed-methods study, comprising: a) before-and-after comparisons of recruitment rates and numbers of patients approached, and b) qualitative case studies, including documentary analysis and interviews with RCT investigators.ResultsFive UK-based publicly-funded RCTs were included in the evaluation. All recruited to target. RCT2 and RCT5 both received up-front pre-recruitment training before the intervention was applied. RCT2 did not encounter recruitment issues and recruited above target from its outset. Recruitment difficulties, particularly communication issues, were identified and addressed through QRI-actions in RCTs 1, 3, 4 and 5. Randomization rates significantly improved post-QRI-action in RCTs 1,3, and 4. QRI-actions addressed issues with approaching eligible patients in RCTs 3 and 5, which both saw significant increases in patients approached. Trial investigators reported that the QRI had unearthed issues they had been unaware of, and reportedly changed their practices post QRI-action.ConclusionThere is promising evidence to suggest the QRI can support recruitment to difficult RCTs. This needs to be substantiated with future controlled evaluations

    Diversity in donorship : the changing landscape of official humanitarian aid

    No full text
    researched, written, and published by the Humanitarian Policy Group at OD

    Once removed: lessons and challenges in remote management of humanitarian operations for insecure areas

    No full text
    The report concludes with a set of options and potential ways forward for the international humanitarian community. It emphasises the urgent need for greater attention and resources to be devoted to developing a holistic, ‘whole of agency’ approach to policy guidance and practical tools for this increasingly common yet unexamined practice. It also urges action for strengthening the duty of care to national and local staff and extending this to national partner organisations. This requires better and more-differentiated risk assessments for national and local staff, and capacity building measures to enhance both their ability to implement programmes and to bolster their security. The most promising examples of remote management found in this research involved coordination structures that were rooted in the local context and exhibited the potential for further, self-generated development in localised humanitarian action
    corecore