Allogenic umbilical cord tissue for temporomandibular joint injuries

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is crucial for functions of daily living such as mastication and articulation. Common TMJ issues include osteoarthritis, internal derangement, and myofascial pain dysfunction. Conservative methods such as physical therapy and medications are used, with surgical options such as arthroscopy and replacement for severe cases. Emerging regenerative medicine explores non-surgical treatments using human stem cells from umbilical cord derivatives, showing potential for tissue regeneration in TMJ disorders. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, aiming to identify relevant articles published in English until August 2023. The search used specific terms to target in vitro, preclinical, and clinical studies on umbilical cord (UC)-derived tissue and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for treating TMJ disorders. The search was extended to three clinical trial registries for on-going investigations related to UC tissue and MSCs for TMJ disorder management. The studies included in this article report the safety and efficacy profiles of allogenically acquired, umbilical cord-derived tissues and associated mesenchymal stem cells for temporomandibular joint ailments, future adequately powered, randomized controlled trials are warranted to conclusively justify the clinical use of this biologic therapy. </p

Allogenic perinatal tissue for musculoskeletal regenerative medicine applications: a systematic review

Producing tremendous amounts of stress and financial burden on the global patient population and healthcare systems around the world, most current modalities of treatment for musculoskeletal ailments often do not address the etiopathogenetic causes of these disorders. Regenerative medicine for musculoskeletal disorders relies on orthobiologics derived from either allogenic or autologous sources. Multiple drawbacks are associated with autologous sources, including donor-site morbidity, a dearth of studies, and variability in both patient reported and clinical/functional outcomes. On the other hand, allogenic sources address several of these concerns, and continue to be a suitable source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). This review qualitatively reports both the preclinical and clinical outcomes of publications studying the applications of umbilical cord (-derived Wharton's jelly), amniotic suspension allograft, amniotic membrane, and amniotic fluid in musculoskeletal medicine. A systematic review was conducted utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines on studies published between January 2010 and October 2022 that used allogeneic perinatal tissues. Further randomized controlled clinical studies are necessary to properly evaluate the safety and efficacy of these tissues in orthopedic surgery. </p

The efficacy and applicability of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-based regimens for primary bone tumors: a comprehensive review of current evidence

Primary bone tumors (PBT), although rare, could pose significant mortality and morbidity risks due to their high incidence of lung metastasis. Survival rates of patients with PBTs may vary based on the tumor type, therapeutic interventions, and the time of diagnosis. Despite advances in the management of patients with these tumors over the past four decades, the survival rates seem not to have improved significantly, implicating the need for novel therapeutic interventions. Surgical resection with wide margins, radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy are the main lines of treatment for PBTs. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, along with emerging immunotherapeutic approaches such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, have the potential to improve the treatment outcomes for patients with PBTs. CAR-T cell therapy has been introduced as an option in hematologic malignancies, with FDA approval for several CD19-targeting CAR-T cell products. This review aims to highlight the potential of immunotherapeutic strategies, specifically CAR T cell therapy, in managing PBTs. </p

Allogenic perinatal tissue for musculoskeletal regenerative medicine applications: a systematic review protocol

Background: Musculoskeletal ailments impact the lives of millions of people, and at times necessitate surgery followed by physiotherapy, drug treatments, or immobilization. Regenerative musculoskeletal medicine has undergone enormous progress over the last few decades. Sources of tissues used for regenerative medicine purposes can be grouped into autologous or allogenic. Although autologous sources are promising, there is a wide range of limitations with the treatment, including the lack of randomized controlled studies for orthopaedic conditions, donor site morbidity, and highly variable outcomes for patients. Allogenic sources bypass some of these shortcomings and are a promising source for orthopaedic regenerative medicine applications. Methods: A systematic search will be performed using PubMed, Elsevier, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases for articles published in English before May 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and guidelines will be used. Studies will be eligible if they apply to acute and chronic orthopaedic musculoskeletal complications or animal or human disease models. Publications must include the use of MSCs and/or tissue obtained from amniotic/chorionic membrane, amniotic fluid, umbilical cord, and/or umbilical cord-derived Wharton's jelly as an intervention. Placebos, noninjury models, acute injury models, non-injury models, and gold standard treatments will be compared. The study selection will be performed by two independent reviewers using a dedicated reference management software. Data synthesis and meta-analysis will be performed separately for preclinical and clinical studies. Discussion: The results will be published in relevant peer-reviewed scientific journals. Investigators will present results at national or international conferences. Trial registration: The Protocol will be registered on PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews prior to commencement.</p

Exploring healthcare disparities in genetic testing and research for hereditary cardiomyopathy: current state and future perspectives

Background Hereditary cardiomyopathies are commonly occurring myocardial conditions affecting heart structure and function with a genetic or familial association, but the etiology is often unknown. Cardiomyopathies are linked to significant mortality, requiring robust risk stratification with genetic testing and early diagnosis.  Hypothesis We hypothesized that health care disparities exist in genetic testing for hereditary cardiomyopathies within clinical practice and research studies.  Methods In a narrative fashion, we conducted a literature search with online databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Science Direct on papers related to hereditary cardiomyopathies. A comprehensive analysis of findings from articles in English on disparities in diagnostics and treatment was grouped into four categories.  Results Racial and ethnic disparities in research study enrollment and health care delivery favor White populations and higher socioeconomic status, resulting in differences in the development and implementation of effective genetic screening. Such disparities have shown to be detrimental, as minorities often suffer from disease progression to heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Barriers related to clinical genetic testing included insurance-related issues and health illiteracy. The underrepresentation of minority populations extends to research methodologies, as testing in ethnic minorities resulted in a significantly lower detection rate and diagnostic yield, as well as a higher likelihood of misclassification of variants.  Conclusions Prioritizing minority-based participatory research programs and screening protocols can address systemic disparities. Diversifying research studies can improve risk stratification strategies and impact clinical practice. </div