7 research outputs found

    Tensile and Hardness Property Evaluation of Kaolin- Sisal Fibre- Epoxy Composite

    Get PDF
    In this work, the tensile and hardness properties of Kaolin- sisal fibre- epoxy composite were evaluated using standard methods. Epoxy type 3354A with its hardener was mixed in the ratio 2:1. Calcined kaolin particle with average size of 35µm and 3-4mm sisal fibre were added to the epoxy matrix during the composite manufacture in a proportion of: 60/40 wt %, 60/30/10 wt %, 60/20/20 wt %, 60/10/30 wt % for matrix, fibre and Kaolin respectively. The green mixtures were poured into aluminum mould and left for 24 hrs to cure. The results showed that the addition of kaolin and sisal fibre affected mechanical properties of the epoxy resin. The maximum strain observed for each specimen after tensile tests were as follows: 12% for specimen A; 12% for specimen B; 3.9% for specimen C; 11.5% for specimen D and 6% for specimen E. The Shore D hardness values were as follows: 79.1 for specimen A (control); 55.68 for specimen B; 42.82 for specimen C; 78.7 for specimen D and 81.34 for specimen E. The hardness values was reduced from 55.68 to 42.83 and increased to 81.34. Specifically, the tensile and hardness properties increased proportionately with the fibre quantity and inversely proportional to the kaolin content. These are attributed to the level of bonding strengths between the fibre-matrix-particulate interfacial adhesions.http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njt.v34i4.1

    Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from Nigerian shrimps

    Get PDF
    Chitin was synthesized from Nigerian brown shrimps by a chemical process involving demineralization and deproteinisation. Deacetylation of the chitin was conducted to obtain Chitosan. The chitin and chitosan were characterized using FTIR, XRD and SEM. Proximate and elemental analysis were also conducted. The percentage yield of chitin was 8.9%. The degree of deacetylation of chitin was found to be 50.64% which was a low value compared to previous works and can be attributed to the low alkali concentration and heating time. XRD patterns indicated that chitin was more crystalline than the corresponding chitosan. FTIR spectra indicated the presence of functional groups associated with different bands, the intensities and stretching established that the samples are chitin and chitosan. SEM analysis also indicated morphological differences between the chitin and chitosan.Keywords: Deacetylation, biodegradable, characterization, deproteinisation, demineralizatio
    corecore