9,544 research outputs found

    Minimal length scales for the existence of local temperature

    Full text link
    We review a recent approach to determine the minimal spatial length scales on which local temperature exists. After mentioning an experiment where such considerations are of relevance, we first discuss the precise definition of the existence of local temperature and its physical relevance. The approach to calculate the length scales in question considers homogenous chains of particles with nearest neighbor interactions. The entire chain is assumed to be in a thermal equilibrium state and it is analyzed when such an equilibrium state at the same time exists for a local part of it. The result yields estimates for real materials, the liability of which is discussed in the sequel. We finally consider a possibility to detect the existence or non-existence of a local thermal state in experiment.Comment: review, 13 pages, 11 figure

    Natural Theories of Ultra-Low Mass PNGB's: Axions and Quintessence

    Full text link
    We consider the Wilson Line PNGB which arises in a U(1)^N gauge theory, abstracted from a latticized, periodically compactified extra dimension U(1). Planck scale breaking of the PNGB's global symmetry is suppressed, providing natural candidates for the axion and quintessence. We construct an explicit model in which the axion may be viewed as the 5th component of the U(1)_Y gauge field in a 1+4 latticized periodically compactified extra dimension. We also construct a quintessence PNGB model where the ultra-low mass arises from Planck-scale suppressed physics itself.Comment: 20 pages, fixed typo and reference

    Update on Electricity Customer Choice In Ohio: Competition Continues to Outperform Traditional Monopoly Regulation (Executive Summary)

    Get PDF
    Key Findings at a Glance: Deregulated Markets Save Ohio Electricity Consumers Billions Since 2011, deregulation has saved Ohio consumers 23.9billion.TheStudyTeamanticipatesthatsavingswillcontinuefortheneartermtobearound23.9 billion. The Study Team anticipates that savings will continue for the near term to be around 3 billion per year. However, these savings may be lost, in whole or in part, if deregulated energy markets continue to be undermined by cross subsidies. Competition Outperforms Monopoly Regulation Competition has driven down average electricity prices in deregulated Midwestern states while their regulated peers have seen a steady increase in price of generated electricity

    Update on Electricity Customer Choice In Ohio: Competition Continues to Outperform Traditional Monopoly Regulation (Executive Summary)

    Get PDF
    Key Findings at a Glance: Deregulated Markets Save Ohio Electricity Consumers Billions Since 2011, deregulation has saved Ohio consumers 23.9billion.TheStudyTeamanticipatesthatsavingswillcontinuefortheneartermtobearound23.9 billion. The Study Team anticipates that savings will continue for the near term to be around 3 billion per year. However, these savings may be lost, in whole or in part, if deregulated energy markets continue to be undermined by cross subsidies. Competition Outperforms Monopoly Regulation Competition has driven down average electricity prices in deregulated Midwestern states while their regulated peers have seen a steady increase in price of generated electricity

    Deregulating Electricity Prices Saves Ohio $3 Billion Each Year

    Get PDF

    Update on Electricity Customer Choice In Ohio: Competition Continues to Outperform Traditional Monopoly Regulation (Full Report)

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study is to provide an update to the research team’s 2016 report “Electricity Customer Choice in Ohio: How Competition Has Outperformed Traditional Monopoly Regulation” using data for 2016 through 2018. Key Findings: 1. Since 2011, Ohio consumers have saved 23.9billionbecauseofderegulation.2.CompetitionhasdrivendownaverageelectricitypricesinderegulatedMidwesternstates(Ohio,Pennsylvania,Illinois),whiletheirregulatedpeers(Indiana,Michigan,Wisconsin)haveseenasteadyincreaseinpriceofgeneratedelectricity.3.TheStudyTeamanticipatesthatsavingswillcontinuefortheneartermtobearound23.9 billion because of deregulation. 2. Competition has driven down average electricity prices in deregulated Midwestern states (Ohio, Pennsylvania, Illinois), while their regulated peers (Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin) have seen a steady increase in price of generated electricity. 3. The Study Team anticipates that savings will continue for the near term to be around 3 billion per year. However, these savings may be lost, in whole or in part, if deregulated energy markets continue to be undermined by cross subsidies of uncompetitive Investor Owned Utility (IOU) generation through Electric Distribution Utility (EDU) riders and surcharges, or through legislatively-mandated, above market Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) and subsidies

    Electricity Customer Choice in Ohio: How Competition Has Outperformed Traditional Monopoly Regulation

    Get PDF
    It took nearly a decade of sorting out regulatory problems, but by 2011 deregulation of the market for electricity generation in Ohio began to work exactly how economic theory projected it would. Since 2011, a robust retail market for electricity has developed in Ohio. As a result, deregulation of electricity has saved consumers an average of 3billionperyear,foratotalof3 billion per year, for a total of 15 billion over five years. Moreover, it is projected to continue to save consumers nearly that amount for the next five years, through 2020, totaling another $15 billion in savings. Further, the Midwestern deregulated states (Ohio, Pennsylvania and Illinois) have, over time, outperformed their regulated Midwestern neighbors (Michigan, Indiana and Wisconsin) in terms of constraining electricity cost increases for their consumers. This Study was undertaken to assess the effects that deregulation of electricity generation has had on electricity prices in Ohio. Deregulation has become controversial in Ohio as several of Ohio’s investor-owned utilities (“IOUs”) sought price supports for their uncompetitive generation facilities. The IOUs sought these supports even though Ohio had deregulated the generation side of the electricity business in 2001

    Antipsychotic Polypharmacy-Related Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality: A Comprehensive Review

    Get PDF
    Schizophrenia is a psychotic disorder that exists at the more extreme end of a spectrum of diseases, and significantly affects daily functioning. Cardiovascular adverse effects of antipsychotic medications are well known, and include changes in blood pressure and arrhythmias. Sudden cardiac death is the leading cause of death worldwide, and antipsychotic medications are associated with numerous cardiac side effects. A possible link exists between antipsychotic medications and sudden cardiac death. Common prescribing patterns that may influence cardiovascular events include the use of multiple antipsychotics and/or additional drugs commonly prescribed to patients on antipsychotics. The results of this review reflect an association between antipsychotic drugs and increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death by iatrogenic prolongation of the QTc interval. QTc prolongation and sudden cardiac death exist in patients taking antipsychotic monotherapy. The risk increases for the concomitant use of specific drugs that prolong the QTc interval, such as opioids, antibiotics, and illicit drugs. However, evidence suggests that QTc intervals may not adequately predict sudden cardiac death. In considering the findings of this narrative review, we conclude that it is unclear whether there is a precise association between antipsychotic polypharmacy and sudden cardiac death with QTc interval changes. The present narrative review warrants further research on this important potential association
    corecore