9 research outputs found
Genetic identification and distribution of the parasitic larvae of Anisakis pegreffii and Anisakis simplex (s. s.) in European hake Merluccius merluccius from the Tyrrhenian Sea and Spanish Atlantic coast: Implications for food safety
The consumption of the hake Merluccius merluccius is widespread in European countries, where this fish has a
high commercial value. To date, different larval species of Anisakis have been identified as parasites in
M. merluccius from European waters, Anisakis pegreffii and Anisakis simplex (s. s.) being the two most common.
The aim of the study is to present data on the occurrence of Anisakis spp. larvae in the viscera and flesh of
M. merluccius. Consequently, the distribution and infection rates of different species of Anisakis in different
sites (viscera, and dorsal and ventral fillets) were investigated in hake caught in the central Tyrrhenian Sea
(FAO 37.1.3) and the NE Atlantic Ocean (FAO 27 IXa). A sample of N = 65 fish individuals (length N 26 cm)
was examined parasitologically from each fishing ground. The fillets were examined using the pepsin digestion
method. A large number (1310) of Anisakis specimens were identified by multilocus allozyme electrophoresis
(MAE) and mtDNA cox2 sequence analysis; among these, 814 larvae corresponded to A. simplex (s. s.) and 476
to A. pegreffii. They were found to infect both the flesh and the viscera. The two species co-infected the same individual
fish (both in the viscera and in the flesh) from the FAO 27 area, whereas only A. pegreffii was found in
hake from the Tyrrhenian Sea. The average parasite burden of A. pegreffii in hake from the Tyrrhenian Sea was
significantly lower to that observed from hake off the Atlantic coast of Spain, both in prevalence and in abundance.
In addition, whereas no significant difference in overall prevalence values was recorded between the
two Anisakis species in the viscera of the FAO 27 sample, significant differences were found in the abundance
levels observed between these species in the flesh, with A. simplex (s. s.) exhibiting significantly higher levels
than that observed for A. pegreffii (p b 0.001). Given that the pathogenic role in relation to man is known for
these two species of Anisakis, both the flesh inspection and the infection rates of the different anisakid species assume
particular importance in terms of assessing the risk they pose to humans