Choledochocele: Choledochal Cyst Ora Distinct Entity?

Choledochocele represents a cystic dilatation of the distal common bile duct and it’s included in Todani’s classification as type III choledochal cysts. We report a case of a 66-years-old man who presented a suspected gallbladder lithiasis with colic abdominal pain, vomit, fever, jaundice and abnormal liver function tests. However the endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography revealed the absence of stones in the common bile duct and the presence of a 15mm-wide choledochocele that was successfully treated with an endoscopic sphincterotomy. Additionally a comprehensive review of the literature of the last 15 years was performed, collecting 105 cases of choledochocele. The available data were classified in 10 variables and subsequently analysed. Summarizing all data, we noticed that choledochocele presents different characteristics if compared with other types of choledochal cysts: The population affected is older, there isn’t a strong female prevalence, the most frequent manifestation is pancreatitis instead of jaundice and cholangitis, the association with anomalous pancreato-biliary duct junction is rare and the risk of malignancy is lower. The standard for the diagnosis is endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography instead of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography and the most accepted treatment is endoscopic sphincterotomy in order to allow the correct outflow of the biliary juice. In conclusion, even if choledochocele is commonly considered a type of cystic dilatation of the common biliary duct and it is usually included in the choledochal cysts classification, it has to be considered as a distinct entity with its own features

Choledochocele: Choledochal Cyst Ora Distinct Entity?

Choledochocele represents a cystic dilatation of the distal common bile duct and it’s included in Todani’s classification as type III choledochal cysts. We report a case of a 66-years-old man who presented a suspected gallbladder lithiasis with colic abdominal pain, vomit, fever, jaundice and abnormal liver function tests. However the endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography revealed the absence of stones in the common bile duct and the presence of a 15mm-wide choledochocele that was successfully treated with an endoscopic sphincterotomy. Additionally a comprehensive review of the literature of the last 15 years was performed, collecting 105 cases of choledochocele. The available data were classified in 10 variables and subsequently analysed. Summarizing all data, we noticed that choledochocele presents different characteristics if compared with other types of choledochal cysts: The population affected is older, there isn’t a strong female prevalence, the most frequent manifestation is pancreatitis instead of jaundice and cholangitis, the association with anomalous pancreato-biliary duct junction is rare and the risk of malignancy is lower. The standard for the diagnosis is endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography instead of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography and the most accepted treatment is endoscopic sphincterotomy in order to allow the correct outflow of the biliary juice. In conclusion, even if choledochocele is commonly considered a type of cystic dilatation of the common biliary duct and it is usually included in the choledochal cysts classification, it has to be considered as a distinct entity with its own features

Solitary colorectal liver metastasis: overview of treatment strategies and role of prognostic factors

The following is an overview of the treatment strategies and the prognostic factors to consider in the therapeutic choice of patients characterized by solitary colorectal liver metastasis. Liver resection is the only potential curative option; nevertheless, only 25% of the patients are considered to be eligible for surgery. To expand the potentially resectable pool of patients, surgeons developed multidisciplinary techniques like portal vein embolization, two-stage hepatectomy or associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Moreover, mini-invasive surgery is gaining support, since it offers lower post-operative complication rates and shorter hospital stay with no differences in long-term outcomes. In case of unresectable disease, various techniques of local ablation have been developed. Radiofrequency ablation is the most commonly used form of thermal ablation: it is widely used for unresectable patients and is trying to find its role in patients with small resectable metastasis. The identification of prognostic factors is crucial in the choice of the treatment strategy. Previous works that focused on patients with solitary colorectal liver metastasis obtained trustable negative predictive factors such as presence of lymph-node metastasis in the primary tumour, synchronous metastasis, R status, right-sided primary colon tumor, and additional presence of extrahepatic tumour lesion. Even the time factor could turn into a predictor of tumour biology as well as further clinical course, and could be helpful to discern patients with worse prognosis

Study International Multicentric Pancreatic Left Resections (SIMPLR): Does Surgical Approach Matter?

Background: Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly preferred for left-sided pancreatic resections. The SIMPLR study aims to compare open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches using propensity score matching analysis. Methods: This study included 258 patients with tumors of the left side of the pancreas who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2020 at three high-volume centers. The patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical approach and matched in a 1:1 ratio. Results: The open group had significantly higher estimated blood loss (620 mL vs. 320 mL, p p = 0.003), and longer hospital stays (16.9 vs. 6.81 days, p p = 0.011) without being significantly longer. The laparoscopic group had a shorter operative time (210 vs. 340 min, p p p < 0.001) when compared to the robotic group. There was no difference in morbidity or mortality between the three techniques. Conclusion: The laparoscopic approach exhibits short-term benefits. The three techniques are equivalent in terms of oncological safety, morbidity, and mortality