Targeted anti-inflammatory systemic therapy for restenosis: The Biorest Liposomal Alendronate with Stenting sTudy (BLAST)—a double blind, randomized clinical trial

Background Activation of systemic innate immunity is critical in the chain of events leading to restenosis. LABR-312 is a novel compound that transiently modulates circulating monocytes, reducing accumulation of these cells at vascular injury sites and around stent struts. The purpose of the study was to examine the safety and efficacy of a single intravenous bolus of LABR-312 in reducing restenosis in patients treated for coronary narrowing. Patient response was examined in light of differential inflammatory states as evidenced by baseline circulating monocyte levels, diabetes mellitus, and acute coronary syndrome. Methods BLAST is a Phase II prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that assessed the safety and efficacy of LABR-312. Patients were randomized to receive LABR-312 at 2 dose levels or placebo as an intravenous infusion during percutaneous coronary intervention and bare metal stent implantation. The primary end point was mean angiographic in-stent late loss at 6 months. Results Patients (N = 225) were enrolled at 12 centers. There were no safety concerns associated with the study drug. For the overall cohort, there were no differences between the groups in the primary efficacy end point (in-stent late loss of 0.86 ± 0.60 mm, 0.83 ± 0.57 mm, and 0.81 ± 0.68 mm for the placebo, low-dose, and high-dose group, respectively; P = not significant for all comparisons). In the prespecified subgroups of patients with a baseline proinflammatory state, patients with diabetes mellitus, and patients with high baseline monocyte count, there was a significant treatment effect. Conclusions Intravenous administration of LABR-312 to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is safe and effectively modulates monocyte behavior. The average late loss did not differ between the treatment and placebo groups. However, in the inflammatory patient group with baseline monocyte count higher than the median value, there was a significant reduction in late loss with LABR-312.BIOrest Ltd

Percutaneous and surgical interventions for in-stent restenosis: long-term outcomes and effect of diabetes mellitus

AbstractOBJECTIVEWe examined long-term outcomes of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) who underwent different percutaneous interventions at the discretion of individual operators: balloon angioplasty (BA), repeat stent or rotational atherectomy (RA). We also examined long-term outcomes of patients with ISR who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).BACKGROUNDIn-stent restenosis remains a challenging problem, and its optimal management is still unknown.METHODSSymptomatic patients (n = 510) with ISR were identified using cardiac catheterization laboratory data. Management for ISR included BA (169 patients), repeat stenting (117 patients), RA (107 patients) or CABG (117 patients). Clinical outcome events of interest included death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and a combined end point of these major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Mean follow-up was 19 ± 12 months (range = 6 to 61 months).RESULTSPatients with ISR treated with repeat stent had significantly larger average post-procedure minimal lumen diameter compared with BA or RA (3.3 ± 0.4 mm vs. 3.0 ± 0.4 vs. 2.9 ± 0.5, respectively, p < 0.05). Incidence of TVR and MACE were similar in the BA, stent and RA groups (39%, 40%, 33% for TVR and 43%, 40%, 33% for MACE, p = NS). Patients with diabetes who underwent RA had similar outcomes as patients without diabetes, while patients with diabetes who underwent BA or stent had worse outcomes than patients without diabetes. Patients who underwent CABG for ISR, mainly because of the presence of multivessel disease, had significantly better outcomes than any percutaneous treatment (8% for TVR and 23% for MACE).CONCLUSIONSIn this large cohort of patients with ISR and in the subset of patients without diabetes, long-term outcomes were similar in the BA, repeat stent and RA groups. Tissue debulking with RA yielded better results only in diabetic patients. Bypass surgery for patients with multivessel disease and ISR provided the best outcomes