Analisis kecenderungan Manhaj Akidah Shaykh Shams al-Din al-Sumatera’i

Shaykh Shams al-Din al-Sumatera'i is a very great and respected scholar during 16th and 17th century of Acheh. His knowledge in various fields recognized by local and international scholars. He had been a Qadi Malik al-’Adil, a religious leader, who became a referred by communities and country during the reign of the three Sultans of Aceh. He has authored nearly 40 pieces of books related to the theology and sufism. This study focuses on the methods used by Shaykh Shams al-Din al-Sumatera'i in his theological writings. This study found that Shaykh Shams al-Din al-Sumatera'i had used six methods in the such writings

Pendekatan Syeikh Daud al-Fatani dalam menganalisis permasalahan Sifat Dua Puluh

Syeikh Daud bin Abdullah al-Fatani (1133H-1847M) atau nama penuhnya ialah Wan Daud bin Wan Abdullah merupakan seorang tokoh ulama Nusantara yang prolifik dan karya-karya masih menjadi rujukan sehingga ke hari ini. Artikel ini membincangkan pendekatan Syeikh Daud al-Fatani dalam menganalisis permasalahan Sifat Dua Puluh. Isu-isu utama yang menjadi perbincangan artikel ini ialah: [i] persoalan sifat Allah SWT; [ii] hakikat kewujudan Allah SWT; dan [iii] pembahagian sifat-sifat Allah SWT. Penulisan artikel ini adalah berdasarkan kajian analisis kandungan. Sumber primer yang menjadi asas dalam penulisan ini ialah karya-karya Syeikh Daud al-Fatani seperti al-Durr al-Thamin, Ward al-Zawahir dan Jawahir al-Saniyyah. Kesimpulannya, pendekatan Syeikh Daud al-Fatani dalam pembahagian sifat-sifat Allah SWT kepada sifat dua puluh adalah pengaruh daripada al-Sanusi dalam memahami persoalan sifat. Walau bagaimanapun Syeikh Daud sebagaimana al-Sanusi tidak mengisbatkan bahawa sifat Allah SWT hanya terbatas kepada dua puluh sifat sahaja kerana sifat kesempurnaan Allah SWT tidak ada had dan batasannya

Isu Melihat Allah SWT di Akhirat Antara Al-Būtī dan Salafiyyah Semasa

Isu dalam menetapkan orang mukmin melihat Allah S.W.T. di akhirat terdapat perselisihan di antara aliran al-AshaÑirah dan Salafiyah semasa. Aliran Salafiyyah semasa berpegang bahawa orang mukmin melihat Allah di akhirat adalah dengan keadaan Allah bertempat, berarah dan berjisim. Manakala al-AshaÑirah pula berpandangan bahawa orang mukmin melihat Allah di akhirat tanpa berjisim, bertempat dan berarah. Al-Būtī merupakan seorang pengkaji tentang aliran al-AshaÑirah yang sentiasa memberi pandangan terhadap aliran-aliran yang berbeza daripada pandangan al-AshaÑirah. Beliau banyak berkecimpung di dalam perdebatan, penyelidikan dan penulisan. Untuk tujuan demikian kajian ini diketengahkan untuk meneliti penghujahan antara al-Būtī dan aliran Salafiyah semasa di dalam isu melihat Allah s.w.t. di akhirat. Kajian ini menggunakan metodologi kualitatif yang menjurus kepada metode dokumentasi, kajian pensejarahan dan analisis perbandingan. Hasil kajian dalam isu ini menunjukkan penghujahan al-Būtī adalah jelas dengan menggunakan dalil naqli dan akal yang seimbang. Selain itu penghujahan beliau adalah selari dengan pandangan Ahli Sunah Waljamaah. Manakala penghujahan salafiyyah mempunyai perbezaan di antara Imam Ahmad dan sebahagian mereka yang mengikut pegangannya.Isu dalam menetapkan orang mukmin melihat Allah S.W.T. di akhirat terdapat perselisihan di antara aliran al-AshaÑirah dan Salafiyah semasa. Aliran Salafiyyah semasa berpegang bahawa orang mukmin melihat Allah di akhirat adalah dengan keadaan Allah bertempat, berarah dan berjisim. Manakala al-AshaÑirah pula berpandangan bahawa orang mukmin melihat Allah di akhirat tanpa berjisim, bertempat dan berarah. Al-Būtī merupakan seorang pengkaji tentang aliran al-AshaÑirah yang sentiasa memberi pandangan terhadap aliran-aliran yang berbeza daripada pandangan al-AshaÑirah. Beliau banyak berkecimpung di dalam perdebatan, penyelidikan dan penulisan. Untuk tujuan demikian kajian ini diketengahkan untuk meneliti penghujahan antara al-Būtī dan aliran Salafiyah semasa di dalam isu melihat Allah s.w.t. di akhirat. Kajian ini menggunakan metodologi kualitatif yang menjurus kepada metode dokumentasi, kajian pensejarahan dan analisis perbandingan. Hasil kajian dalam isu ini menunjukkan penghujahan al-Būtī adalah jelas dengan menggunakan dalil naqli dan akal yang seimbang. Selain itu penghujahan beliau adalah selari dengan pandangan Ahli Sunah Waljamaah. Manakala penghujahan salafiyyah mempunyai perbezaan di antara Imam Ahmad dan sebahagian mereka yang mengikut pegangannya

Sumbangan Jabatan Hal Ehwal Islam Kelantan (JAHEAIK) dalam memperkasakan akidah ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah

Jabatan Hal Ehwal Agama Islam Kelantan (JAHEAIK) was officially established in 1950 to assist Majlis Agama Islam dan Adat Istiadat Melayu Kelantan (MAIK) in extend Islamic teachings and monitored the development of Islamic teachings in Kelantan from any forms of deviation teachings contrary to the creed of Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah (ASWJ). The purpose of this study is to discuss the contribution of JAHEAIK in empowering the creed of ASWJ. A qualitative approach with document analysis and interview methods was used to obtain the required information accurately. The results found that JAHEAIK had tremendously contributed to the community by strengthening the creed of ASWJ through organizing the programs and conducting activities. In conclusion, this study found that JAHEAIK's contribution to the empowerment of the creed of ASWJ in Kelantan is effective and continuous

A Discourse on the Atheism within the Malaysian Society

Belief in God is the first of several principles enshrined in the Rukun Negara of Malaysia which makes it one of the important principles to be upheld by any Malaysian citizen. However, there are some who do not accept this concept of believing in God and they are referred to as atheists. The existence of this group can seen clearly when issues that concern this group became public knowledge like the meeting of atheists in Kuala Lumpur that took place in 2017 and the existence of a Facebook group called Warung Atheist (Atheist Stall). Therefore, this article is prepared to discuss a discourse on the atheism within the Malaysian society including: [1] to analyze past studies related to the definitions and history of atheism; [2] to analyze past studies related to atheist thoughts and arguments and [3] to analyze past studies related to the response and objection to atheism. This article is written using qualitative method with content analysis design. In general, the research findings show that, in Malaysia, there are so few studies conducted on this topic. The study on the definitions and history of atheism among Malaysian researchers is still lacking because many researchers make the studies as a side topic only. This also happens to studies on themes related to atheism, but it should be noted that there are several studies have begun to make focusing on atheism. However, most researchers in Malaysia conduct studies which concern the objection against and criticism towards atheism

Tema dan isu induk perbahasan akidah dalam al-Muqaddimāt karya Muhammad bin Yūsuf al-Sanūsī

Al-Muqaddimāt merupakan salah satu karya akidah Muhammad bin Yūsuf al-Sanūsī yang masyhur. Walaubagaimanapun, tema dan isu perbahasan yang dimuatkan di dalam karya tersebut dilihat amat berbeza dengan karya-karya akidah lain. Ini kerana perbahasan ilāhiyyāt, nubūwwāt dan samʻiyyāt yang menjadi perbahasan utama akidah tidak diperbahaskan secara khusus di dalamnya. Justeru, artikel ini dihasilkan bagi melihat secara mendalam apakah tema dan isu induk yang terdapat dalam al-Muqaddimāt selain menonjolkan hubungkait karya tersebut dengan karya-karya akidah lain serta peranannya dalam kajian-kajian akidah. Objektif dan perbincangan yang diketengahkan melalui artikel ini ialah: [i] pengenalan terhadap al-Muqaddimāt; [ii] tema dan isu perbahasan akidah dalam al-Muqaddimāt; dan [iii] peranan serta kepentingan al-Muqaddimāt dalam kajian akidah. Penulisan artikel ini dilakukan berasaskan kajian kualitatif dengan metode analisis kandungan terhadap al-Muqaddimāt berserta huraiannya yang berjudul Sharḥ al-Muqaddimāt yang juga merupakan karya al-Sanūsī. Selain itu, karya-karya ulama lain yang berkaitan dengan perbincangan juga dilihat bagi mengukuhkan analisis. Dapatan awal mendapati bahawa al-Muqaddimāt berserta huraiannya merupakan salah satu dari lima karya akidah utama al-Sanūsī yang digelar al-Silsilah al-ʻAqdiyyah al-Sanūsiyyah (rantaian karya-karya akidah al-Sanūsī). Ia berperanan sebagai pengantar kepada karya-karya akidah dan ilmu Kalam yang berteraskan fahaman Ahli Sunah Waljamaah. Memahami kandungan al-Muqaddimāt secara mendalam dilihat menjadi pemangkin kepada pemahaman akidah yang benar menerusi karya-karya lain. Justeru, pemahaman akidah melalui karya-karya lain amat bergantung kepada pemahaman kandungan al-Muqaddimāt terlebih dahulu kerana peranannya sebagai pengantar

Creatividad y construcción arquitectónica de vanguardia : estudio sobre proceso de invención y modelo didáctico de aplicación para el desarrollo creativo en la enseñanza [sic] aprendizaje en la introducción al diseño arquitectónico

En esta tesis, se profundiza en los estudios sobre el fenómeno de la creatividad aplicada en diferentes ámbitos de estudio, de la época de finales del siglo XIX principios del XX. La hipótesis planteada en este trabajo se centra en la posibilidad de dar a conocer el proceso del pensamiento creativo a los profesores-arquitectos, para que éstos puedan innovar y valorar el material adecuado en el desarrollo de la actividad creativa, y emplearlo con los alumnos de los dos primeros semestres de la carrera de ingeniero arquitecto, en el Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN) de México. El estudio se enfoca a realizar una exhaustiva revisión bibliográfica de las teorías de la creatividad, los entornos de aprendizaje, el arte moderno y la arquitectura, determinando algunas características y desarrollos especulativos, para luego cotejarlos con el análisis de dos obras arquitectónicas de gran envergadura. Se consultaron los programas de estudio de dos asignaturas de la etapa formativa de la carrera de ingeniero arquitecto, relacionadas con el diseño arquitectónico y el Nuevo Modelo Educativo del IPN.MadridBellas Artes, Sección de Tesis Doctorales y Publicaciones Académicas; El Greco 2, Ciudad Universitaria; 28040 Madrid; +34913943626; [email protected] de la Univerisdad Complutense. Servicio de Tesis Doctorales y Publicaciones Académicas; Noviciado, 3; 28015 Madrid; Tel. +34913946641; Fax +34913946599; [email protected]

منهج السلفية المعاصرين في العقيدة

Salafi has emerged as a new school of thought in the modern era. They are alleged to be propagating the Muslims of returning to the belief of the so-called salaf al-salih (the pious of the past) from the Prophet’s Companions and their successors in the matter of `aqidah using method that claimed to be true compared to methods used by other Islam’s school of thoughts. However, their claim for the use of such method has been objected by the ulama of Ahl Sunnah wa al-Jamaah. As the method used by this group in understanding the teachings of Islam has negative impact on the Muslim society, an objective study in recognising the method of this new school of thought is needed in warranting the extent of its compatibility with the method of the Salaf ulama. Hence, this study will employ deductive method in assembling ideas and statements made by contemporary Salafi ulama. These ideas will be analysed critically and then compared to the ulama Ahl Sunnah wa al-Jamaah’s views. The result of the study shows that the Salafi method has its root from the 3rd Hijrah school of thought. It also shows that the method is in contrast with the method of the Ahl Sunnah wa al-Jamaah as explicated by the Muslim ulama. The dissemination of this school of thought among the Muslim society has raised distorted understanding and conflict among Muslim youth especially with regard to furu` (the branch of religion) issues related to discourse in `aqidah

APPRAISAL OF HUMAN ACTS DISCOURSE AMONG ASHĀ‘IRAH SCHOLARS

Purpose: This paper attempts to illuminate the different opinions of Ashā‘irah scholars namely, Al-Bāqillānī, Al-Juwaynī and Al-Ghazālī on the subject of human acts. The discourse of human acts emerges from the argument of God’s attributes qudrah and irādah. It was first discussed by Jabariyyah and Qadariyyah which was then eventually elevated by the Mu’tazilah in understanding human acts. Methodology: This study is a qualitative study in nature that employs document analysis method. The comparative analysis will be done in order to examine similarities and differences found in the discussion of the Ashā‘irah scholars. Main Findings: As a whole, the four scholars anticipated in different arguments. It can be summed that Al-Ash‘arī and Al-Ghazālī hold that human acts are still considered as acts of God considering all actions are created by Him. Meanwhile, Al-Bāqillānī and Al-Juwaynī maintained human acts to be free from God’s acts. Applications: The discussion of this study serves as an important mean in comprehending the discourse of the Ashā‘irah tradition on the concept of human acts. Novelty/Originality: This paper examines the arguments and proofs based on the Ashā‘irah scholars which will look into their respective writings on the discourse of human act

Al- Ghazālī’s approach in defending the Islamic faith

Al-Ghazālī is considered as imam (the most prominent) in epistemological critique and religious sects during his time, and one of the most prominent in defending the belief of Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā‘ah (Sunni Muslims, Sunnis, Sunnites). He is also considered one of the most prominent of theorizing of the Ash‘arī theology (Asharites or Ashʿarism) and Sufi thought. He was able to purify philosophy from superstition, and clarifies what is bad from what is sound, and he is considered as mujaddid (reformer) in his time. He was also distinguished by his intelligence, quality of writing, and erudition, as the objectives of the research were the manifestation of al-Ghazālī’s approach in defending the Islamic faith and his opinion on philosophy, theology, mysticism, and al-Bāṭiniyyah (The Sect of Batiniyya; esotericism) through studying his position in his book al-Iqtiṣād fī al-Iʿtiqād (The Moderation in Belief), Tahāfut al-Falāsifah (The Incoherence of the Philosophers), al-Munqidh min al-Ḍalāl (The Rescuer from Error) and Fadā’ih al-Bāṭiniyyah (The Infamies of the Esotericists). His positions were studied according to the historical, inductive, analytical, and critical research method. The study found that al-Ghazālī was able to be the master of his time in defending and establishing the belief of Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā‘ah, as he was also aware of the war to the al-Bāṭiniyyah and scholars, sultans, and the common people were charged with its war. Likewise, al-Ghazālī worked on establishing the Islamic faith and demonstrating it with textual and rational evidence. He criticized ‘Ilm al-Kalām (Islamic scholastic theology) and aiming it in accordance with the Islamic faith, and its use in defending and defining the Islamic faith and called for it to be preserved from the common people and to be used only in defence of the Islamic faith