Pharmacokinetics of secnidazole in healthy volunteers after single oral dose

Introduction: Secnidazole is an anti infective agent which belongs to the 5-nitroimidazole class. Method: The objective of the trial was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of secnidazole after oral administration of a 2g dose, as microgranules formulation in healthy subjects. Blood samples were collected before, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 168 and 240 h after dosing. Urines were collected in 24-h-fractions for the first five days and in 48 h-fraction for the last sample. The cumulative urinary excretion was captured for each subject from urine concentration (lg/L). Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by a non-compartmental approach (WinNonlin Pharsight). The assay was performed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry detection (UPLC-MS/MS, Quattro Premier, Waters) after simple protein precipitation of 50 lL plasma sample. Chromatographic separation was done on a C18 Acquity column (50 mm · 2.1 mm, id 1.7 lm, Waters), in isocratic mode (80% water/0.1% formic acid and 20% acetonitrile). Ornidazole was used as internal standard. The detection was operated in positive mode and multiple reaction monitoring was used for quantification (186 > 128 ion transition for secnidazole). The lower limit of quantification was 10 and 100 lg/L for plasma and urine samples respectively. Results: Sixteen subjects (8 female, 8 male) were included. Population characteristics such as: age ranged from 23 to 50 years (mean ± SD: 38 ± 9.2 years), weight ranged from 51 to 90 Kg (mean ± SD = 64.6 ± 10.1 Kg) and body mass index (BMI) ranged from 19.9 to 24.2 Kg/m 2 (mean ± SD = 21.9 ± 1.5 Kg/m 2 ;). Secnidazole exposure achieved a maximal concentration (Cmax) with a mean of 37.9 ± 8.5 mg/L (range 20–56 mg/L) and at a median time associated with the Cmax (Tmax) of 6 h (range 3–6 h). The area under the curve to the last measurable time (AUC0_t) and the total area under the curve (AUC0_¥) were 1281.9 ± 416.4 mg h/L and 1304.2 ± 444.1 mg h/L (mean ± SD) respectively. The Cl/F and V/F were 1.7 ± 0.5 L/h and 40.2 ± 9.2 L respectively and the elimination half-life (t1/2) was 17.5 ± 4.3 h (mean ± SD). The mean amount of secnidazole excreted in the 168-h urine collection was 310.47 mg (15.5% of the administered dose). For example, for the subject number 5, the observed parameters are: Cmax 37.3 mg/L, Tmax 3 h, AUC0_¥ 1029.5 mg h/L and t1/2 15.6 h. Conclusion: After a 2 g single oral dose, secnidazole presents a good absorption profile and relatively long elimination half life ensuring probable sufficient exposure with once a day administration

Investigating the KNDy hypothesis in humans by co-administration of kisspeptin, neurokinin B and naltrexone in men

Context: A subpopulation of hypothalamic neurons co-localise three neuropeptides namely kisspeptin, neurokinin B (NKB) and dynorphin collectively termed KNDy neurons. Animal studies suggest they interact to affect pulsatile GnRH release (KNDy hypothesis); kisspeptin stimulates, NKB modulates and dynorphin (an opioid) inhibits. Objective: To investigate the KNDy hypothesis in humans, we assessed for the first time the effects of co-administration of kisspeptin-54, NKB and an opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone on LH pulsatility (surrogate marker for GnRH pulsatility) and gonadotropin release. Design, setting and participants: Ethically approved prospective, single-blinded placebo-controlled study. Healthy male volunteers (n=5/group) attended our research facility for 8 study visits. Intervention and main outcome measure: After 1h baseline blood sampling, participants received a different intervention at each visit: oral 50mg naltrexone (NAL), 8h intravenous infusions of vehicle, 2.56nmol/kg/h NKB (NKB), 0.1nmol/kg/h kissspeptin-54 (KP) alone and in combination. Frequent blood sampling to measure plasma gonadotropins and sex steroids was conducted and LH pulsatility was determined using blinded deconvolution analysis. Results: All kisspeptin and naltrexone containing groups potently increased LH and LH pulsatility (p<0.001 vs vehicle). NKB alone did not affect gonadotropins. NKB+KP had significantly lower increases in gonadotropins compared with kisspeptin alone (p<0.01). NAL+KP was the only group to significantly increase LH pulse amplitude (p<0.001 vs vehicle). Conclusions: Our results suggest significant interactions between the KNDy neuropeptides on LH pulsatility and gonadotropin release in humans. This has important implications for improving our understanding of GnRH pulse generation in humans

Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole and posaconazole administered in experimental models of disseminated scedosporiosis with cerebral involvement

International audienc

Healthcare access for refugees in Greece: Challenges and opportunities

The arrival of more than one million refugees and migrants in Europe in 2015, most of whom transited through Greece, has placed significant strains on local health systems and demonstrated the need for preparedness to meet the immediate and longer-term health needs of arrivals in EU countries. Population movements will continue to occur and the need for cost effective, appropriate provision of both primary and secondary health services to meet these needs is key. The Global Compact on Migration was ratified in 2018 and forms an overarching, international agreement to address safe, orderly and regular migration which benefits refugees and migrants as well as host communities; however, it did not give due emphasis to health. In this manuscript, we explore the evolution of the health response for refugees in Greece over the last three years, the challenges faced at different times of the response and the efforts to integrate refugees into Greece’s health system

Pharmacokinetic analysis of pralidoxime after its intramuscular injection alone or in combination with atropine-avizafone in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Treatment of organophosphate poisoning with pralidoxime needs to be improved. Here we have studied the pharmacokinetics of pralidoxime after its intramuscular injection alone or in combination with avizafone and atropine using an auto-injector device. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH The study was conducted in an open, randomized, single-dose, two-way, cross-over design. At each period, each subject received either intramuscular injections of pralidoxime (700 mg), or two injections of the combination: pralidoxime (350 mg), atropine (2 mg), avizafone (20 mg). Pralidoxime concentrations were quantified using a validated LC/MS-MS method. Two approaches were used to analyse these data: (i) a non-compartmental approach; and (ii) a compartmental modelling approach. KEY RESULTS The injection of pralidoxime combination with atropine and avizafone provided a higher pralidoxime maximal concentration than that obtained after the injection of pralidoxime alone (out of bioequivalence range), while pralidoxime AUC values were equivalent. Pralidoxime concentrations reached their maximal value earlier after the injection of the combination. According to Akaike and to goodness of fit criteria, the best model describing the pharmacokinetics of pralidoxime was a two-compartment with a zero-order absorption model. When avizafone and atropine were injected with pralidoxime, the best model describing pralidoxime pharmacokinetics becomes a two-compartment with a first-order absorption model. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The two approaches, non-compartmental and compartmental, showed that the administration of avizafone and atropine with pralidoxime results in a faster absorption into the general circulation and higher maximal concentrations, compared with the administration of pralidoxime alone

Kisspeptin-neuron control of LH pulsatility and ovulation

Feedback from oestradiol (E2) plays a critical role in the regulation of major events in the physiological menstrual cycle including the release of gonadotrophins to stimulate follicular growth, and the mid-cycle luteinising hormone (LH) surge that leads to ovulation. E2 predominantly exerts its action via oestrogen receptor-alpha (ERα), however, as gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons lack ERα, E2-feedback is posited to be indirectly mediated via upstream neurons. Kisspeptin (KP) is a neuropeptide expressed in hypothalamic KP-neurons that control GnRH secretion and plays a key role in the central mechanism regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. In the rodent arcuate (ARC) nucleus, KP is co-expressed with Neurokinin B and Dynorphin; and thus, these neurons are termed ‘Kisspeptin-Neurokinin B-Dynorphin’ (KNDy) neurons. ARC KP-neurons function as the ‘GnRH pulse generator’ to regulate GnRH pulsatility, as well as mediating negative feedback from E2. A second KP neuronal population is present in the rostral periventricular area of the third ventricle (RP3V), which includes anteroventral periventricular (AVPV) nucleus and preoptic area neurons. These RP3V KP-neurons mediate positive feedback to induce the mid-cycle luteinising hormone (LH) surge and subsequent ovulation. Here, we describe the role of KP-neurons in these two regions in mediating this differential feedback from oestrogens. We conclude by considering reproductive diseases for which exploitation of these mechanisms could yield future therapies

Whose voices should shape global health education? Curriculum codesign and codelivery by people with direct expertise and lived experience

There are contrasting opinions of what Global Health (GH) curricula should contain and limited discussion on whose voices should shape it. In GH education, those with first-hand expertise of living and working in the contexts discussed in GH classrooms are often absent when designing curricula. To address this, we developed a new model of curriculum co-design called Virtual Roundtable for Collaborative Education Design (ViRCoED). This paper describes the rationale and outputs of the ViRCoED approach in designing a new section of the Global Health BSc curriculum at Imperial College London, with a focus on healthcare in the Syrian conflict. The team, importantly, involved partners with lived and/or professional experience of the conflict as well as alumni of the course, and educators in all stages of design and delivery through to marking and project evaluation. The project experimented with disrupting power dynamics and extending ownership of the curriculum beyond traditional faculty by co-designing and co-delivering module contents together with colleagues with direct expertise and experience of the Syrian context. An authentic approach was applied to assessment design using real-time syndromic healthcare data from the Aleppo and Idlib Governorates. We discuss the challenges involved in our collaborative partnership and describe how it may have enhanced the validity of our curriculum with students engaging in a richer representation of key health issues in the conflict. We observed an enhanced self-reflexivity in the students’ approach to quantitative data and its complex interpretation. The dialogic nature of this collaborative design was also a formative process for partners and an opportunity for GH educators to reflect on their own positionality. The project aims to challenge current standards and structures in GH curriculum development and gesture towards a GH education sector eventually led by those with lived experience and expertise to significantly enhance the validity of GH education