Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? – A consensus and critical position paper

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s) and International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Transcranial (electro)magnetic stimulation (TMS) is currently the method of choice to non-invasively induce neural activity in the human brain. A single transcranial stimulus induces a time-varying electric field in the brain that may evoke action potentials in cortical neurons. The spatial relationship between the locally induced electric field and the stimulated neurons determines axonal depolarization. The induced electric field is influenced by the conductive properties of the tissue compartments and is strongest in the superficial parts of the targeted cortical gyri and underlying white matter. TMS likely targets axons of both excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The propensity of individual axons to fire an action potential in response to TMS depends on their geometry, myelination and spatial relation to the imposed electric field and the physiological state of the neuron. The latter is determined by its transsynaptic dendritic and somatic inputs, intrinsic membrane potential and firing rate. Modeling work suggests that the primary target of TMS is axonal terminals in the crown top and lip regions of cortical gyri. The induced electric field may additionally excite bends of myelinated axons in the juxtacortical white matter below the gyral crown. Neuronal excitation spreads ortho- and antidromically along the stimulated axons and causes secondary excitation of connected neuronal populations within local intracortical microcircuits in the target area. Axonal and transsynaptic spread of excitation also occurs along cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical connections, impacting on neuronal activity in the targeted network. Both local and remote neural excitation depend critically on the functional state of the stimulated target area and network. TMS also causes substantial direct co-stimulation of the peripheral nervous system. Peripheral co-excitation propagates centrally in auditory and somatosensory networks, but also produces brain responses in other networks subserving multisensory integration, orienting or arousal. The complexity of the response to TMS warrants cautious interpretation of its physiological and behavioural consequences, and a deeper understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of TMS will be critical for advancing it as a scientific and therapeutic tool.Aman S. Aberra was supported by a U. S. A. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (No. DGF 1106401). Andrea Antal has been supported by a grant of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) of Germany (Grant 01GP2124B) and by a grant of the Lower Saxony Ministry of Science and Culture (Grant 76251-12-7/19 ZN 3456). Marco Davare has been supported by a BBSRC responsive mode grant. Klaus Funke has been supported by a grant of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) of Germany (Grant 01EE1403B) as part of the German Center for Brain Stimulation (GCBS) and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (Grants FU256/3-2; 122679504–SFB874). Mark Hallett is supported by the NINDS Intramural Program. Anke N. Karabanov holds a 4-year Sapere Aude Fellowship which is sponsored by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (Grant Nr. 0169-00027B). The sponsor had no direct involvement in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in the writing of the manuscript. Giacomo Koch has been supported by na EU grant H2020-EU.1.2.2. - FET Proactive (Neurotwin ID: 101017716). Sabine Meunier is Emeritus Research Director at INSERM, this has no direct involvement in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in the writing of the manuscript. Carlo Miniussi has been supported by a grant of the Caritro Foundation, Italy. Walter Paulus received grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and BMBF. Angel V. Peterchev was supported by grants from the U. S. A. National Institutes of Health (Grants Nos. R01NS117405, R01NS088674, RF1MH114268, R01MH111865). Traian Popa has been supported by the Defitech Foundation and NIBS-iCog grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation. Hartwig R. Siebner holds a 5-year professorship in precision medicine at the Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Copenhagen which is sponsored by the Lundbeck Foundation (Grant Nr. R186-2015-2138). The salary for Janine Kesselheim (PhD project) has been covered by a project grant “Biophysically adjusted state-informed cortex stimulation” (BASICS) funded by a synergy grant from Novo Nordisk Foundation (PI: Hartwig R Siebner, Interdisciplinary Synergy Program 2014; grant number NNF14OC001). Axel Thielscher has been supported by grants of the Lundbeck foundation (R118-A11308, R244-2017-196 and R313-2019-622). Yoshikazu Ugawa has been supported in part by grants from the Research Project Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Grants 15H05881, 16H05322, 19H01091, 20K07866). Ulf Ziemann received grants from the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), European Research Council (ERC), and German Research Foundation (DFG)

Does Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Increase Survival in At-Risk Populations? Patient Selection, Biomarkers, and Barriers

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly morbid and prevalent cancer globally. While high quality evidence for mortality benefit of HCC surveillance is lacking, early detection of HCC is likely beneficial as prognosis is highly correlated with tumor stage. High risk populations, including patients with cirrhosis and subgroups with Hepatitis B, should undergo surveillance with ultrasound ± alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) at 6-month intervals. In addition, emerging data suggest that patients with Hepatitis C cirrhosis who achieve sustained virologic response should continue surveillance. Further research is needed to determine the value of surveillance in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the absence of cirrhosis or with advanced fibrosis of other etiologies. Newer biomarkers and models such as Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP, des-γ-carboxy prothrombin, and the GALAD score are increasingly utilized in the diagnosis and prognostication of HCC. The role of these biomarkers in surveillance is still under investigation but may potentially offer a more practical alternative to traditional image-based surveillance. Despite recommendations from multiple professional society guidelines, many at-risk patients do not receive HCC surveillance due to barriers at the patient, clinician, and health care system levels. Strategies such as implementing patient navigation services, educating clinicians about surveillance guidelines, and creating automated outreach systems, may improve surveillance rates and ultimately reduce morbidity and mortality from HCC