7 research outputs found

    Synchronization and resynchronization of inseminations in lactating dairy cows with the CIDR insert and the Ovsynch protocol

    No full text
    Pregnancy per artificial insemination (AI) was evaluated in dairy cows (Bos taurus) subjected to synchronization and resynchronization for timed AI (TAI). Cows (n = 718) received prostaglandin F2a (PGF) on Days –38 and –24 (Days 39 and 53 postpartum), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on Day –10, PGF on Day –3, and GnRH and TAI on Day 0. Between Days –10 and –3, cows received a progesterone intravaginal insert (CIDR group) or no CIDR (Control group). Between Days 14 and 23, cows received a CIDR (Resynch CIDR group) or no CIDR (Resynch control group), GnRH on Day 23, with pregnancy diagnosis on Day 30. Cows in estrus (between Days 0 and 30) were re-inseminated at detected estrus (RIDE). Nonpregnant cows received PGF on Day 30 and GnRH and TAI on Day 33. Plasma progesterone was determined to be low or high on Days –24 and –10. Pregnancy rates were evaluated 30 and 55 d after AI. The CIDR insert included in the Presynch-Ovsynch protocol did not increase overall pregnancy per AI for first service (36.1% and 33.6% for CIDR; 34.1% and 28.8% for Control) but did decrease pregnancy loss (7.0% for CIDR and 15.6% for Control). The CIDR insert increased pregnancy per AI in cows with high progesterone at the time the CIDR insert was applied. Administration of a CIDR insert between Days 14 and 23 of the estrous cycle after first service did not increase overall pregnancy per AI to second service (24.7% and 22.7% for Resynch CIDR; 28.6% and 25.3% for Resynch control). For second service, RIDE cows had lower pregnancy rates in the Resynch CIDR group than in the Resynch control group. Cows with a CL (corpus luteum) at Day 30 had higher pregnancy rates in the Resynch CIDR group than those in the Resynch control grou

    Efficacy of estradiol or GnRH in combination with progesterone intravaginal devices to control the follicular wave dynamics and resulting fertility in lactating dairy cows

    No full text
    This study was conducted to compare efficacy of treatments with EB or GnRH and different quantities of exogenous progesterone (P4) for synchronization of time of ovulation on follicular growth and pregnancy in lactating dairy cows. In Experiment 1, 40 cows were treated with EB or GnRH and 1.9 or 3.0 g of P4 via progesterone-containing intravaginal devices (IVPD; D0), two doses of PGF2α on D7, GnRH on D9, and TAI on D10. In Experiment 2, 1,440 cows were treated with EB or GnRH and 1 g IVPD on D0, cloprostenol, eCG and EB on D7. Cows in estrus by 48 h were AIDE, and non-estrous cows were administered GnRH and TAI 60 h after IVPD removal. Non-estrous cows were AIDE 72 h after IVPD removal. In Experiment 1, P4 was greater on D7 for cows treated with GnRH than those treated with EB. The dominant follicle was larger for cows treated with GnRH than those treated with EB. In Experiment 2, for estrous cows, pregnancy per AI was greater in cows AI at 48 h compared to 60 h after IVPD removal for cows treated with GnRH, and greater with AI at 60 h after IVPD removal compared to 48 h in EB-treated cows. In non-estrous cows, there was no effect on pregnancy. In conclusion, treatment with GnRH compared with EB resulted in increased P4 regardless of amount of exogenous P4, and there were differential proportions of estrous cows pregnant depending on time of AI after IVPD removal.Fil: Scandolo Lucini, Diego Germán. Universidad Nacional del Litoral; ArgentinaFil: Dominguez, G.. No especifíca;Fil: Bilbao, María Guillermina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Perez, Wallace S.. No especifíca;Fil: Zapata, L.O.. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa; ArgentinaFil: Ravera, E.. No especifíca;Fil: Melendez, P.G.. University of Georgia; Estados UnidosFil: Archbald, L.F.. University of Florida; Estados UnidosFil: de la Sota, Rodolfo Luzbel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Bartolome, J.A.. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa; Argentin

    Factors influencing social organization in postpartum Angus cows under confinement. Effect on cow-Calf weight change

    Full text link
    The objective was to determine factors influencing social organization in postpartum Angus cows and its effect on variation of cow–calf weight after 90 d. Postpartum Angus cows (N=90) with no history of puerperal problems, a calf suckling, and body condition score (BCS) no less than 3 were allocated into 3 groups of 30 (A, B, and C) according to parity (P) and cow body frame (CF). Using the agonistic interactions recorded during the study, a raw dominance value with subsequent Arc-sin conversion (Arc-sin DV) was calculated to generate a linear social dominance order (DO) with 3 social categories (dominant—D-, intermediate—I-, and subordinate—S-cows). The effects of postpartum body weight (PPBW), BCS, CF, and P on Arc-sin DV were statistically analyzed using ANOVA. Similar procedure was applied to analyze the effects of group, P, CF, and DO on cow body weight at 90 d (CW90), and the effects of DO of dams, P, group, calf gender (CG), and sire within breed (SWB) on calf body weight at 90 d (CFW90). Cows with larger CF and heavier PPBW obtained greatest (P<0.0005) Arc-sin DV. The youngest and the oldest cows tended (P<0.10) to obtain the lowest Arc-sin DV. After 90 d of trial, D cows were heavier than I (P<0.002) and S cows (P<0.0001). Calf birth weight was influenced by SWB (P<0.03) and P (P<0.05), and D cows had heavier (P<0.05) calf at birth than S cows. At 90 d, calf body weight was influenced by P (P<0.03) and DO of dam (P<0.008). Thus, calf weight at 90 d increased with DO of dams. In conclusion, CF, PPBW, and to a less extent P, influenced DO. Parity and CF influenced PPBW. Variation of CW90 was influenced by DO. Calf birth weight was influenced by SWB, P, DO of cow, and CG. Meanwhile, CFW90 was influenced by P and DO of cow. Interactions among social organization, management strategies, calf growth, and reproductive aspects need more attention
    corecore