Tracing the Rules of Sexual Abnormality in the Islamic Jurisprudence

Sexual abnormality or deviation is a social disorder that is considered a violation of social norms and expectations of civility. Such behavior is deemed deviant because it goes against religious rules and values upheld by society. This research aims to establish a middle ground between sexual deviation and Islamic jurisprudence with regard to sexual deviation activities. To achieve this, a comprehensive review of linked data sources was conducted using qualitative and literary research. The findings showed that certain types of sexual deviance such as sadomasochism, exhibitionism, voyeurism, fetishes, and others have not been extensively discussed in fiqh books. According to the rules of Uşul Fiqh, "al-wasāil laha hukmu al-gāyah ", indicates that the law of means (instruments) follows the law of purpose. This shows sexual deviance is considered one of the means to adultery, and as such, it falls under the law of adultery.Sexual abnormality or deviation is a social disorder that is considered a violation of social norms and expectations of civility. Such behavior is deemed deviant because it goes against religious rules and values upheld by society. This research aims to establish a middle ground between sexual deviation and Islamic jurisprudence with regard to sexual deviation activities. To achieve this, a comprehensive review of linked data sources was conducted using qualitative and literary research. The findings showed that certain types of sexual deviance such as sadomasochism, exhibitionism, voyeurism, fetishes, and others have not been extensively discussed in fiqh books. According to the rules of Uşul Fiqh, "al-wasāil laha hukmu al-gāyah ", indicates that the law of means (instruments) follows the law of purpose. This shows sexual deviance is considered one of the means to adultery, and as such, it falls under the law of adultery

CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE LEGAL REGULATION OF MICROTRANSACTION ‘GACHA’: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ISLAMIC CRIMINAL LAW AND NATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW

Microtransactions are a type of small-scale financial transaction conducted online. With the advent of the internet, trading transactions no longer require direct interaction between the seller and the buyer, as everything is done through online platforms. One form of microtransaction found in games is gacha. The issue of microtransaction gacha arises due to their inherent gambling elements. However, there is a loophole in current criminal law in Indonesia where no specific regulation governs this issue. This research aims to compare the differences in the legal regulation of microtransaction gacha between national criminal law and Islamic criminal law. The research methodology employed is a comparative method with a literature review approach. The findings of this research indicate that there is no specific regulation in national criminal law that categorizes microtransaction gacha as prohibited acts under the law, whereas, in Islamic criminal law, microtransaction gacha fulfill the elements of gambling and are therefore considered haram (forbidden). Therefore it is important to establish a framework of criminal law that regulates gacha systems to minimize the impacts caused by microtransaction gacha

The Legal Landscape: A Comparative Examination of Religious Blasphemy Enforcement in Egypt and Indonesia

The objective of this study is to ascertain the comparative analysis of religious blasphemy legislation in Egypt and Indonesia. This study also elucidates the implementation of religious blasphemy legislation in Egypt and Indonesia. This study involves comparative legal research. Comparative research was conducted to gather additional insights on the blasphemy laws in Egypt and Indonesia. This study employs library research methodology to gather both primary and secondary data. The findings of this study indicate that the legislation governing religious blasphemy in Indonesia is law number. 1/ PNPS/1965, but in Egypt it is article 98 of the Egyptian Penal Code. Additionally, this study discovered parallels in the implementation of religious blasphemy legislation in Egypt and Indonesia. The implementation of anti-blasphemy legislation in both nations frequently subjects defendants to a succession of grave human rights infringements perpetrated by both private individuals and government agent